Assessment of working memory abilities in normal hearing individuals with and without misophonia.

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1177/17470218251322718
Princita Dsouza Adline, Kavassery Venkateswaran Nisha, Prashanth Prabhu, Ajith Kumar Uppunda
{"title":"Assessment of working memory abilities in normal hearing individuals with and without misophonia.","authors":"Princita Dsouza Adline, Kavassery Venkateswaran Nisha, Prashanth Prabhu, Ajith Kumar Uppunda","doi":"10.1177/17470218251322718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate working memory (WM) abilities in normal hearing individuals with and without misophonia using simple and complex WM tasks, and to correlate WM abilities with the severity of misophonia. The data were collected employing a standard group comparison and a non-probability purposive sampling method. The current study comprised 40 participants aged 18-30 years, who were classified into two groups (with and without misophonia) based on the scores obtained in the Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire (MAQ). Simple tasks, including forward and backward digit span, and complex tasks, including operation and reading span, were used to assess WM abilities. WM abilities, measured using simple WM tasks, were comparable between the two groups. Although the operation span scores revealed no statistically significant difference among the complex tasks, there was a statistically significant difference in the reading span scores. The performance of individuals with misophonia remained similar to those without misophonia in simple WM tasks. However, their WM performance becomes poorer as tasks become more demanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251322718"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251322718","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate working memory (WM) abilities in normal hearing individuals with and without misophonia using simple and complex WM tasks, and to correlate WM abilities with the severity of misophonia. The data were collected employing a standard group comparison and a non-probability purposive sampling method. The current study comprised 40 participants aged 18-30 years, who were classified into two groups (with and without misophonia) based on the scores obtained in the Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire (MAQ). Simple tasks, including forward and backward digit span, and complex tasks, including operation and reading span, were used to assess WM abilities. WM abilities, measured using simple WM tasks, were comparable between the two groups. Although the operation span scores revealed no statistically significant difference among the complex tasks, there was a statistically significant difference in the reading span scores. The performance of individuals with misophonia remained similar to those without misophonia in simple WM tasks. However, their WM performance becomes poorer as tasks become more demanding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPRESS:有恐音症和没有恐音症的正常听力个体的工作记忆能力评估。
目的:本研究旨在通过简单和复杂的工作记忆任务来评估有恐音症和无恐音症的正常听力个体的工作记忆能力,并探讨工作记忆能力与恐音症严重程度的关系。方法:采用标准分组比较和非概率目的抽样方法收集资料。目前的研究包括40名年龄在18-30岁之间的参与者,他们根据恐惧症评估问卷(MAQ)的得分分为两组(有和没有恐音症)。简单任务包括前向数字广度和后向数字广度,复杂任务包括运算广度和阅读广度。结果:用简单脑记忆任务测量的脑记忆能力在两组之间具有可比性。在复杂任务中,虽然操作广度得分差异无统计学意义,但阅读广度得分差异有统计学意义。结论:恐音症患者与非恐音症患者在简单WM任务中的表现相似。然而,随着任务的要求越来越高,他们的WM性能会变得越来越差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: The Processing of Color Words in Sentence Comprehension. EXPRESS: The syntax-semantics interface in a child's path: A study of 3- to 11-year-olds' elicited production of Mandarin recursive relative clauses. EXPRESS: Exaggerated case effects when logographic readers process alphabetically written words. EXPRESS: The Impact of Interference Rate on the Test-Retest Reliability of the Stroop Test. EXPRESS: Motor information might be relatively preserved in healthy aging: Investigation of body-object interaction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1