Safety reporting in neonatal clinical trials: reflections towards optimal, globally relevant approaches.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Trials Pub Date : 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-08723-y
Louise F Hill, Christina W Obiero, Adrie Bekker, Ann Sarah Walker, Julia A Bielicki, Mike Sharland, Francesca Schiavone
{"title":"Safety reporting in neonatal clinical trials: reflections towards optimal, globally relevant approaches.","authors":"Louise F Hill, Christina W Obiero, Adrie Bekker, Ann Sarah Walker, Julia A Bielicki, Mike Sharland, Francesca Schiavone","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-08723-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adverse event (AE) collection is a key part of evidence generation in clinical trials and an integral element of safety reporting. AE assessment and documentation is particularly challenging in neonates who are a heterogeneous population with high rates of co-morbidities. Neonatal research is finally gaining the attention of regulators regarding drug development and the need for optimal dosing specific to this population. However, further efforts are necessary to ensure that adverse events (AEs) are adequately collected, allowing for the generation of essential safety data. It is also crucial that the methodology used aligns with the intended trial outcomes to minimise the burden on trial sites. In resource-constrained settings, where pharmacovigilance implementation can be particularly challenging, a pragmatic approach to safety reporting is even more important given the significant public health need for effective drugs. This commentary reflects on some of the challenges and potential areas of improvement in safety reporting that could be addressed in future neonatal-focused trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08723-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adverse event (AE) collection is a key part of evidence generation in clinical trials and an integral element of safety reporting. AE assessment and documentation is particularly challenging in neonates who are a heterogeneous population with high rates of co-morbidities. Neonatal research is finally gaining the attention of regulators regarding drug development and the need for optimal dosing specific to this population. However, further efforts are necessary to ensure that adverse events (AEs) are adequately collected, allowing for the generation of essential safety data. It is also crucial that the methodology used aligns with the intended trial outcomes to minimise the burden on trial sites. In resource-constrained settings, where pharmacovigilance implementation can be particularly challenging, a pragmatic approach to safety reporting is even more important given the significant public health need for effective drugs. This commentary reflects on some of the challenges and potential areas of improvement in safety reporting that could be addressed in future neonatal-focused trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿临床试验中的安全性报告:对最佳全球相关方法的反思。
不良事件(AE)收集是临床试验证据生成的关键部分,也是安全性报告的组成部分。AE的评估和记录尤其具有挑战性,因为新生儿是异质人群,合并症发生率高。新生儿研究最终获得了药物开发监管机构的关注,并需要针对这一人群的最佳剂量。然而,需要进一步努力确保充分收集不良事件(ae),以便生成基本的安全数据。同样重要的是,所使用的方法要与预期的试验结果保持一致,以尽量减少试验地点的负担。在资源有限的情况下,药物警戒的实施可能特别具有挑战性,鉴于对有效药物的巨大公共卫生需求,采用务实的方法进行安全报告就更为重要。这篇评论反映了在未来以新生儿为重点的试验中可能解决的安全报告方面的一些挑战和潜在改进领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
期刊最新文献
Global landscape of yttrium-90 clinical trials: a systematic registry-based analysis. Outdoor nature-based activities for mental vitality and cognitive empowerment in older adults: a randomized controlled trial protocol. Correction: Nutritional management of growth faltering in infants aged under six months in Asia and Africa: study protocol for a multicentre randomised trial (BRANCH, BReAstfeediNg Counselling and management of growtH). The efficacy and safety of precision repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in alleviating motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PRESS-PD): a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. Optimizing Primary Care Tools for Incontinence MAnagement (OPTIMA): protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1