Nephrostomy (PCN) versus nephroureteral stent (Double JJ); An ongoing battle.

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urologia Journal Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1177/03915603251316702
Mohammad Ghasemi-Rad, Kelly Trinh, David Wynne, Mohadese Ahmadzade, Muhammad Hamza Shamim, Omar Guerrero, Ashley Bancroft, Shreya Ranganath, David Leon
{"title":"Nephrostomy (PCN) versus nephroureteral stent (Double JJ); An ongoing battle.","authors":"Mohammad Ghasemi-Rad, Kelly Trinh, David Wynne, Mohadese Ahmadzade, Muhammad Hamza Shamim, Omar Guerrero, Ashley Bancroft, Shreya Ranganath, David Leon","doi":"10.1177/03915603251316702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the realm of medical procedures for urinary obstructions, a distinct division of roles is evident: the vast majority of percutaneous nephrostomies (PCNs) are the domain of Interventional Radiology (IR), while the placement of double J stents (JJ stents) falls squarely under Urology. This division, however, is not without its complexities. When confronted with a patient suffering from a urinary obstruction, the decision-making process can become intricate. The underlying cause often fuels the debate: should IR intervene with a PCN, or should Urology place a JJ stent? Such decisions have profound implications for the individual patient.In this comprehensive review, we aim to compare the utilization of PCN to that of JJS in a variety of clinical settings and evaluate their indications, relative efficacies, and potential complications to ascertain whether one procedure outperforms the other.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"424-431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12287553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603251316702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the realm of medical procedures for urinary obstructions, a distinct division of roles is evident: the vast majority of percutaneous nephrostomies (PCNs) are the domain of Interventional Radiology (IR), while the placement of double J stents (JJ stents) falls squarely under Urology. This division, however, is not without its complexities. When confronted with a patient suffering from a urinary obstruction, the decision-making process can become intricate. The underlying cause often fuels the debate: should IR intervene with a PCN, or should Urology place a JJ stent? Such decisions have profound implications for the individual patient.In this comprehensive review, we aim to compare the utilization of PCN to that of JJS in a variety of clinical settings and evaluate their indications, relative efficacies, and potential complications to ascertain whether one procedure outperforms the other.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾造口术(PCN)与肾输尿管支架(双JJ);一场持续的战斗。
在泌尿系统梗阻的医疗程序领域,一个明显的角色划分是显而易见的:绝大多数经皮肾造口术(pcn)属于介入放射学(IR)的领域,而双J型支架(JJ支架)的放置则完全属于泌尿外科。然而,这种划分并非没有其复杂性。当面对患有尿路梗阻的病人时,决策过程可能变得复杂。潜在的原因经常引发争论:IR是否应该介入PCN,或者泌尿科是否应该放置JJ支架?这样的决定对每个病人都有深远的影响。在这篇综合综述中,我们的目的是比较PCN和JJS在各种临床环境中的应用,并评估它们的适应症、相对疗效和潜在并发症,以确定一种手术是否优于另一种手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
期刊最新文献
Tadalafil and tamsulosin in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: A prospective, randomized, open-label, comparative study. Use of fibrin glue versus martius flap interposition in Trans-vaginal vesicovaginal fistula repair: A prospective randomized trial. Multicenter study on the effectiveness of entomological extract-based therapy in men with lower urinary symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia and chronic prostatitis. Safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in pediatric patients: Insights from a single-center study. Evaluating the accuracy and reliability of overactive bladder-related YouTube videos: A digital health quality analysis using DISCERN and GQS tools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1