Effect of sarcopenia on the survival of patients undergoing liver transplantation: a meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Surgery Today Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1007/s00595-025-03008-y
Miho Akabane, Yuki Imaoka, Toshihiro Nakayama, Carlos O Esquivel, Kazunari Sasaki
{"title":"Effect of sarcopenia on the survival of patients undergoing liver transplantation: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Miho Akabane, Yuki Imaoka, Toshihiro Nakayama, Carlos O Esquivel, Kazunari Sasaki","doi":"10.1007/s00595-025-03008-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The relationship between sarcopenia and post-liver transplant (LT) mortality is still not well understood. This study aims to provide an updated and comprehensive meta-analysis evaluating the impact of sarcopenia on the survival of LT patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted searches in PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE up until May 2, 2024, without language restrictions. The primary outcome measured was the overall post-LT mortality risk associated with sarcopenia. The DerSimonian-Laird random effects model was used to calculate pooled adjusted hazard ratios (HRs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen cohort studies comprising a total 6297 LT patients were included. The overall prevalence of sarcopenia was 27% (95% CI: 26%-28%), and this rate was lower when sarcopenia was defined using the third lumbar-skeletal muscle index in men, and among patients with lower Child-Pugh class. Sarcopenia remained significantly associated with higher mortality, with a pooled adjusted HR of 1.55 (95% CI 1.28-1.89). This association held across subgroups based on sex, study location, sarcopenia definition, study quality, and living donor LT recipients. A sensitivity analysis excluding groups with a high proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma patients showed similar findings (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.13-2.35). No significant heterogeneity was identified in any of the analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis shows that sarcopenia is significantly associated with increased mortality after LT. Thus, the risk of sarcopenia should be factored into the initial evaluation of LT candidates.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03008-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The relationship between sarcopenia and post-liver transplant (LT) mortality is still not well understood. This study aims to provide an updated and comprehensive meta-analysis evaluating the impact of sarcopenia on the survival of LT patients.

Methods: We conducted searches in PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE up until May 2, 2024, without language restrictions. The primary outcome measured was the overall post-LT mortality risk associated with sarcopenia. The DerSimonian-Laird random effects model was used to calculate pooled adjusted hazard ratios (HRs).

Results: Eighteen cohort studies comprising a total 6297 LT patients were included. The overall prevalence of sarcopenia was 27% (95% CI: 26%-28%), and this rate was lower when sarcopenia was defined using the third lumbar-skeletal muscle index in men, and among patients with lower Child-Pugh class. Sarcopenia remained significantly associated with higher mortality, with a pooled adjusted HR of 1.55 (95% CI 1.28-1.89). This association held across subgroups based on sex, study location, sarcopenia definition, study quality, and living donor LT recipients. A sensitivity analysis excluding groups with a high proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma patients showed similar findings (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.13-2.35). No significant heterogeneity was identified in any of the analyses.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis shows that sarcopenia is significantly associated with increased mortality after LT. Thus, the risk of sarcopenia should be factored into the initial evaluation of LT candidates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
期刊最新文献
Predictors of intraoperative and postoperative air leakage in anatomical pulmonary resection. Changes in surgical versus nonsurgical treatments for gastrointestinal cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide analysis in Japan. The Key Ripper: a specialized fixed suture-cutting device to facilitate drain removal. Effectiveness of vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction in open abdomen management. A comparison of pancreatojejunostomy using the modified Blumgart anastomosis with or without a four-needle three-loop suture device and continuous sutures for duct-to-mucosa anastomosis in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1