Tålt brutalitet? Om hva vi vet og ikke vet om mennesker med narkotikarelaterte problemer.

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1177/14550725241288328
Nicolay Borchgrevink Johansen
{"title":"Tålt brutalitet? Om hva vi vet og ikke vet om mennesker med narkotikarelaterte problemer.","authors":"Nicolay Borchgrevink Johansen","doi":"10.1177/14550725241288328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Norwegian drug policy has been disputed for more than 50 years and rose to the top of the political agenda when the government proposed a reform in 2021. To make a sound evaluation of the current policy regime, it is a requirement that the upsides can be balanced with the downsides. The term \"control damage\" captures some of the downsides, which have received political attention in recent years. This debate piece expands the concept of control damages, and it presents an outline of knowledge about unhealth and living conditions in drug scenes, and supplements it with the voices of \"users\". The recurring theme is nevertheless the absence of knowledge. There is a lack of knowledge about both health and general conditions in drug scenes. There is also a lack of understanding the illicit drug culture. What is the meaning of the brutality that takes place in them? These cultures are simultaneously over-controlled and unpoliced societies. Would the drug policy debate play out differently if health and life conditions were the starting point?</p>","PeriodicalId":46180,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs","volume":"42 1","pages":"6-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11803724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14550725241288328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Norwegian drug policy has been disputed for more than 50 years and rose to the top of the political agenda when the government proposed a reform in 2021. To make a sound evaluation of the current policy regime, it is a requirement that the upsides can be balanced with the downsides. The term "control damage" captures some of the downsides, which have received political attention in recent years. This debate piece expands the concept of control damages, and it presents an outline of knowledge about unhealth and living conditions in drug scenes, and supplements it with the voices of "users". The recurring theme is nevertheless the absence of knowledge. There is a lack of knowledge about both health and general conditions in drug scenes. There is also a lack of understanding the illicit drug culture. What is the meaning of the brutality that takes place in them? These cultures are simultaneously over-controlled and unpoliced societies. Would the drug policy debate play out differently if health and life conditions were the starting point?

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挪威的毒品政策已经存在了50多年的争议,并在2021年政府提出改革时上升到政治议程的首位。要对现行的政策制度作出合理的评价,就必须平衡利弊。“控制损害”一词抓住了近年来受到政治关注的一些缺点。这篇辩论文章扩展了控制损害的概念,概述了关于毒品场景中不健康和生活条件的知识,并以“使用者”的声音作为补充。然而,反复出现的主题是知识的缺乏。人们对毒品现场的健康和一般情况都缺乏了解。人们对非法毒品文化也缺乏了解。发生在他们身上的残忍是什么意思?这些文化同时是过度控制和无警察的社会。如果以健康和生活条件为出发点,关于毒品政策的辩论会有不同的结果吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
36
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Understanding Child Maltreatment and Support Needs in Families with Problematic Parental Substance use. Substance use of older adults in gerontological social work client documents. The grey market for alcohol on social media in Sweden. Fifty Years of Cooperation: Towards More or Less Content? Social Investment Logics, Potential and Ageing: A Commentary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1