The Insult Is in the FAQ.

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE LITERATURE AND MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Samantha Barrick
{"title":"The Insult Is in the FAQ.","authors":"Samantha Barrick","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a buzzing insurgence of interest in medical humanities, narrative medicine, and related arts-based programming aimed at ameliorating some of the tragic failings of our contemporary medical complex and the capitalistic grip it struggles within. This paper examines popular questions posed at the intersections of medicine and arts/humanities* to reveal underlying relationships of power, economy, and malappropriated™ imaginative labor in medical education and clinical settings. To do so, the author presents responses to three exemplary FAQs in unabashedly subjective manifestations of language including sarcasm, lyric, lament, defiance, and poetic wit, then organizes this data into four separate categories: Reframing Retorts, Analogies, Stage Whispers, and Apologetics.This method was not informed by a desire to forge a common language (we can each keep our own TYVM), but rather to place meaning halfway between these systems of knowledge production as a temporary compromise both enterprises can learn from; a sort of consensual linguistic drag, if you will. The results of this probe and analysis are presented in easy-to-skim charts for those even marginally interested in uncovering what is at stake in these imperfect, albeit inspiring, unions.Finally, the author proposes a new form of validating instrument to collect further data and seeks to transmit generalizable knowledge that can deepen our relationships to those around us at these intersections and beyond. A question emerges: is the way humanists and artists are treated in medical institutions analogous to the ways the internal lives of physicians are treated?*Can one really conflate art = humanities? Are they really in the same boat? The author acknowledges this uneasy melding, and asserts that the balance of similarities vs. differences is \"context dependent.\" Read on.**Nota bene, the author is a poet and her biases towards, and knowledge of, poetics are disproportionately represented in her discussion of \"the humanities.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":44538,"journal":{"name":"LITERATURE AND MEDICINE","volume":"42 2","pages":"249-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LITERATURE AND MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a buzzing insurgence of interest in medical humanities, narrative medicine, and related arts-based programming aimed at ameliorating some of the tragic failings of our contemporary medical complex and the capitalistic grip it struggles within. This paper examines popular questions posed at the intersections of medicine and arts/humanities* to reveal underlying relationships of power, economy, and malappropriated™ imaginative labor in medical education and clinical settings. To do so, the author presents responses to three exemplary FAQs in unabashedly subjective manifestations of language including sarcasm, lyric, lament, defiance, and poetic wit, then organizes this data into four separate categories: Reframing Retorts, Analogies, Stage Whispers, and Apologetics.This method was not informed by a desire to forge a common language (we can each keep our own TYVM), but rather to place meaning halfway between these systems of knowledge production as a temporary compromise both enterprises can learn from; a sort of consensual linguistic drag, if you will. The results of this probe and analysis are presented in easy-to-skim charts for those even marginally interested in uncovering what is at stake in these imperfect, albeit inspiring, unions.Finally, the author proposes a new form of validating instrument to collect further data and seeks to transmit generalizable knowledge that can deepen our relationships to those around us at these intersections and beyond. A question emerges: is the way humanists and artists are treated in medical institutions analogous to the ways the internal lives of physicians are treated?*Can one really conflate art = humanities? Are they really in the same boat? The author acknowledges this uneasy melding, and asserts that the balance of similarities vs. differences is "context dependent." Read on.**Nota bene, the author is a poet and her biases towards, and knowledge of, poetics are disproportionately represented in her discussion of "the humanities."

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
侮辱在常见问题解答中。
人们对医学人文、叙事医学和相关的以艺术为基础的项目产生了浓厚的兴趣,这些项目旨在改善我们当代医学综合体的一些悲剧性失败,以及它所挣扎的资本主义控制。本文考察了在医学和艺术/人文*交叉领域提出的流行问题,以揭示医学教育和临床环境中权力、经济和不恰当的想象力劳动之间的潜在关系。为了做到这一点,作者以毫不掩饰的主观语言表现形式,包括讽刺、抒情、哀叹、反抗和诗意的机智,对三个典型的常见问题给出了回应,然后将这些数据组织成四个不同的类别:重构反驳、类比、舞台低语和护教。这种方法并不是想要形成一种共同的语言(我们可以各自保留自己的TYVM),而是把意义放在这些知识生产系统之间,作为两家企业都可以学习的临时妥协;如果你愿意的话,这是一种双方同意的语言障碍。这一调查和分析的结果以易于浏览的图表形式呈现给那些对揭示这些不完美但鼓舞人心的联盟的利害攸关感兴趣的人。最后,作者提出了一种新形式的验证工具来收集进一步的数据,并寻求传播可推广的知识,这些知识可以加深我们与周围人在这些交叉点及其他地方的关系。一个问题出现了:医疗机构对待人文主义者和艺术家的方式是否类似于对待医生内心世界的方式?人们真的能把艺术和人文混为一谈吗?他们真的在同一条船上吗?作者承认这种令人不安的融合,并断言相似与差异的平衡是“依赖于上下文的”。继续读下去。**当然,作者是一位诗人,她对诗学的偏见和知识在她对“人文”的讨论中不成比例地体现出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Literature and Medicine is a journal devoted to exploring interfaces between literary and medical knowledge and understanding. Issues of illness, health, medical science, violence, and the body are examined through literary and cultural texts. Our readership includes scholars of literature, history, and critical theory, as well as health professionals.
期刊最新文献
"A World of Unknowing": Facing Shame in Lucy Grealy's Autobiography of a Face. Forgetting Forwards: Film and the Weirdness of Trauma Research. Everything's Racist MLK Day. It's Time to Talk About Abortion: Shame, Fiction, and Legislative Change in Western Europe. Editor's Foreword.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1