How Indigenous Knowledges and Knowledge Systems Are Centered in Research: An Indigenous-informed Realist Review Protocol.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Nikki Hunter Porter, Nicole Bulger, Anita Benoit, Josie Auger, Raglan Maddox, Janet Jull, Janice Linton, Joanna Nemeth, Simon Brascoupé, Noé Préfontaine, Diane Simon, Tina Lanceleve, Jaiden Herkimer, Cora Weber-Pillwax, Ningwakwe George, Marcia Friesen, Lisa Bourque Bearskin, Melody Morton Ninomiya
{"title":"How Indigenous Knowledges and Knowledge Systems Are Centered in Research: An Indigenous-informed Realist Review Protocol.","authors":"Nikki Hunter Porter, Nicole Bulger, Anita Benoit, Josie Auger, Raglan Maddox, Janet Jull, Janice Linton, Joanna Nemeth, Simon Brascoupé, Noé Préfontaine, Diane Simon, Tina Lanceleve, Jaiden Herkimer, Cora Weber-Pillwax, Ningwakwe George, Marcia Friesen, Lisa Bourque Bearskin, Melody Morton Ninomiya","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Euro-Western forms of research, Indigenous Knowledges (IK) and Knowledge systems have been misused, devalued, and stolen. Elders and Knowledge Guardians have expressed the need for IK to be protected for future generations and be included in research in a good way.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aim to disrupt the ongoing dominance of Eurocentric research methodologies focused on Indigenous Peoples by promoting and nurturing rights-based and distinctions-based approaches that center Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing within the entirety of this research project.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This protocol paper describes how we developed an Indigenous-informed realist review process and what the process entails. When conducting our realist review, we will examine papers indicating that IK were centered in research. Our iterative process is shaped and guided by IK within our team. To be included in the analysis, papers must (1) identify how Indigenous Peoples were leading, guiding, and/or governing the research; (2) describe how IK were a critical component of research; and (3) report on how the research benefitted Indigenous Peoples. All papers that meet our inclusion criteria will be scored using a relevance assessment tool we developed to assess how much information was provided on the local context for the Indigenous research, the outcomes from the IK in research, and the processes that facilitated the research outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our intention is to synthesize and amplify how IK have been centered in research, across multiple disciplines and geographies, to benefit Indigenous Peoples. We focus on nurturing and fostering ways of doing Indigenous research and including IK in a way that supports the well-being of Indigenous Peoples.</p>","PeriodicalId":46970,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","volume":"18 4","pages":"561-572"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Euro-Western forms of research, Indigenous Knowledges (IK) and Knowledge systems have been misused, devalued, and stolen. Elders and Knowledge Guardians have expressed the need for IK to be protected for future generations and be included in research in a good way.

Objectives: We aim to disrupt the ongoing dominance of Eurocentric research methodologies focused on Indigenous Peoples by promoting and nurturing rights-based and distinctions-based approaches that center Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing within the entirety of this research project.

Methods: This protocol paper describes how we developed an Indigenous-informed realist review process and what the process entails. When conducting our realist review, we will examine papers indicating that IK were centered in research. Our iterative process is shaped and guided by IK within our team. To be included in the analysis, papers must (1) identify how Indigenous Peoples were leading, guiding, and/or governing the research; (2) describe how IK were a critical component of research; and (3) report on how the research benefitted Indigenous Peoples. All papers that meet our inclusion criteria will be scored using a relevance assessment tool we developed to assess how much information was provided on the local context for the Indigenous research, the outcomes from the IK in research, and the processes that facilitated the research outcomes.

Conclusions: Our intention is to synthesize and amplify how IK have been centered in research, across multiple disciplines and geographies, to benefit Indigenous Peoples. We focus on nurturing and fostering ways of doing Indigenous research and including IK in a way that supports the well-being of Indigenous Peoples.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊最新文献
Lessons from Two Latino Communities Working with Academic Partners to Increase Access to COVID-19 Testing. Infectious Disease Preparedness for Homeless Populations: Recommendations from a Community-Academic Partnership. Evaluating the Impact and Effectiveness of Flint's Community Ethics Review Board (CBOP-CERB): A Pilot Study. Bridging the Gap: Addressing Immigrant Health Through Community-initiated Screening Events. Engaging with Rural Communities for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Using Modified Boot Camp Translation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1