Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with bioinductive patch achieves equivalent patient-reported outcomes and retear rate at 1 year.

IF 1.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Shoulder and Elbow Pub Date : 2025-02-06 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1177/17585732251317954
Joshua P Castle, Johnny K Kasto, Eric X Jiang, Michael A Gaudiani, Trevor D Wolterink, Taylor Timoteo, Jacob Best, Shariff K Bishai, Patricia A Kolowich, Stephanie J Muh
{"title":"Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with bioinductive patch achieves equivalent patient-reported outcomes and retear rate at 1 year.","authors":"Joshua P Castle, Johnny K Kasto, Eric X Jiang, Michael A Gaudiani, Trevor D Wolterink, Taylor Timoteo, Jacob Best, Shariff K Bishai, Patricia A Kolowich, Stephanie J Muh","doi":"10.1177/17585732251317954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a bioinductive patch augmentation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) in terms of patient-reported outcomes, motion, and complications stratified by tear size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients undergoing primary RCR with and without bioinductive bovine collagen patch augmentation for supraspinatus/infraspinatus tears from 2014 to 2022 at two centers was performed. Exclusion criteria included: age <18 years, revisions, or lack of 6-month postoperative follow-up. Patients were propensity-score matched 2:1 to patch-augmented patients based on age, sex, BMI, and tear size. Outcomes were compared between the patch and control groups after being stratified by tear size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 125 patients patch augmented RCRs were matched to 250 controls. No significant differences in demographics or comorbidities between groups. Following stratification by tear size, VAS for partial and small/medium tears in the patch cohorts were lower (<i>p</i> = 0.02) at 3 months. Functional scores were not statistically different. Patch-augmented partial and small/medium tears showed increased forward elevation (<i>p</i> < 0.05) at 1-year follow-up. Retear rates were statistically similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bioinductive patch augmentation demonstrates equivalent outcomes for pain and function, retear rate, but is associated with improved forward elevation up to 1-year for partial and small/medium tears.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"266-276"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11803597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251317954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a bioinductive patch augmentation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) in terms of patient-reported outcomes, motion, and complications stratified by tear size.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing primary RCR with and without bioinductive bovine collagen patch augmentation for supraspinatus/infraspinatus tears from 2014 to 2022 at two centers was performed. Exclusion criteria included: age <18 years, revisions, or lack of 6-month postoperative follow-up. Patients were propensity-score matched 2:1 to patch-augmented patients based on age, sex, BMI, and tear size. Outcomes were compared between the patch and control groups after being stratified by tear size.

Results: A total of 125 patients patch augmented RCRs were matched to 250 controls. No significant differences in demographics or comorbidities between groups. Following stratification by tear size, VAS for partial and small/medium tears in the patch cohorts were lower (p = 0.02) at 3 months. Functional scores were not statistically different. Patch-augmented partial and small/medium tears showed increased forward elevation (p < 0.05) at 1-year follow-up. Retear rates were statistically similar.

Conclusions: Bioinductive patch augmentation demonstrates equivalent outcomes for pain and function, retear rate, but is associated with improved forward elevation up to 1-year for partial and small/medium tears.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关节镜下使用生物感应贴片的肩袖修复达到了相同的患者报告的结果和1年的复发率。
目的:本研究的目的是评估关节镜下肩袖修复(RCR)后生物诱导贴片增强的安全性和有效性,包括患者报告的结果、运动和按撕裂大小分层的并发症。方法:回顾性分析2014年至2022年在两个中心接受首次RCR治疗的患者,分别采用和不采用生物诱导牛胶原贴片增强术治疗棘上/棘下撕裂。排除标准包括:年龄结果:125例贴片增强rcr患者与250例对照者匹配。两组在人口统计学或合并症方面无显著差异。按撕裂大小分层后,贴片队列中部分撕裂和中小型撕裂的VAS在3个月时较低(p = 0.02)。功能评分无统计学差异。结论:生物诱导贴片增强在疼痛和功能、撕裂率方面表现出相同的结果,但对于部分撕裂和中小型撕裂,其前向高度的改善可达1年。证据等级:III级,回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊最新文献
Single versus dual tendon transfer for global irreparable rotator cuff tears. Does graft thickness affect outcomes in massive rotator cuff repairs with on-lay and bridging graft augmentation? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes of primary rotator cuff repair in non-diabetic patients using glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists: A propensity-matched analysis. Soft tissue reconstruction techniques for irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears: A systematic review of clinical outcomes. Removing the sling reduces pain immediately after shoulder surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1