Patterns of management for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: A comparative study of open and arthroscopic approaches.

IF 1.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Shoulder and Elbow Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1177/17585732251316466
Apurvakumar Patel, Kerollos G Ibrahim, Olamide Oshikoya, Matthew Conlon, Jason Epstein, Amir R Kachooei
{"title":"Patterns of management for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: A comparative study of open and arthroscopic approaches.","authors":"Apurvakumar Patel, Kerollos G Ibrahim, Olamide Oshikoya, Matthew Conlon, Jason Epstein, Amir R Kachooei","doi":"10.1177/17585732251316466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-traumatic elbow stiffness (PTES) often results in significant functional impairment. Open elbow arthrolysis (OEA) and arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis (AEA) are two surgical management options. This study aimed to compare the incidence, demographics, and treatment patterns of patients with PTES undergoing OEA and AEA from 2014 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted using the TriNetX database. Patients diagnosed with elbow stiffness (ICD-10 codes M25.621, M25.622, M25.629) were included. Rates of OEA (CPT 24149, 24006) and AEA (CPT 29837, 29838) were identified. Demographic characteristics and simultaneous surgical procedures were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30,624 patients were diagnosed with PTES, with 848 undergoing OEA (2.8%) and 361 undergoing AEA (1.2%). The mean age for OEA patients was 44.3 ± 17.6 years, while AEA patients had a mean age of 37.9 ± 18.9 years. OEA was more common in males (61.2%) and non-Hispanic/Latino patients (68.3%). AEA showed higher rates in younger patients and non-Hispanic/Latino individuals (72.7%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study highlights a preference for OEA in older patients with complex conditions, while AEA is more common in younger patients. Despite the growing trend toward minimally invasive techniques, OEA remains prevalent. Further research is needed to understand the drivers of these trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732251316466"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11803594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251316466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-traumatic elbow stiffness (PTES) often results in significant functional impairment. Open elbow arthrolysis (OEA) and arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis (AEA) are two surgical management options. This study aimed to compare the incidence, demographics, and treatment patterns of patients with PTES undergoing OEA and AEA from 2014 to 2023.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the TriNetX database. Patients diagnosed with elbow stiffness (ICD-10 codes M25.621, M25.622, M25.629) were included. Rates of OEA (CPT 24149, 24006) and AEA (CPT 29837, 29838) were identified. Demographic characteristics and simultaneous surgical procedures were assessed.

Results: A total of 30,624 patients were diagnosed with PTES, with 848 undergoing OEA (2.8%) and 361 undergoing AEA (1.2%). The mean age for OEA patients was 44.3 ± 17.6 years, while AEA patients had a mean age of 37.9 ± 18.9 years. OEA was more common in males (61.2%) and non-Hispanic/Latino patients (68.3%). AEA showed higher rates in younger patients and non-Hispanic/Latino individuals (72.7%).

Discussion: The study highlights a preference for OEA in older patients with complex conditions, while AEA is more common in younger patients. Despite the growing trend toward minimally invasive techniques, OEA remains prevalent. Further research is needed to understand the drivers of these trends.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤后肘关节僵硬的治疗模式:开放和关节镜入路的比较研究。
背景:创伤后肘关节僵硬(PTES)通常会导致严重的功能障碍。开放性肘关节置换术(OEA)和关节镜下肘关节置换术(AEA)是两种手术治疗方法。本研究旨在比较2014年至2023年接受OEA和AEA治疗的PTES患者的发病率、人口统计学特征和治疗模式:研究使用 TriNetX 数据库进行了回顾性分析。纳入了诊断为肘关节僵硬(ICD-10代码M25.621、M25.622、M25.629)的患者。确定了 OEA(CPT 24149、24006)和 AEA(CPT 29837、29838)的比率。对人口统计学特征和同时进行的外科手术进行了评估:共有 30624 名患者被诊断为 PTES,其中 848 人接受了 OEA(2.8%),361 人接受了 AEA(1.2%)。OEA患者的平均年龄为(44.3 ± 17.6)岁,而AEA患者的平均年龄为(37.9 ± 18.9)岁。OEA 更常见于男性(61.2%)和非西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者(68.3%)。AEA在年轻患者和非西班牙裔/拉美裔患者中的发病率更高(72.7%):讨论:该研究强调,病情复杂的老年患者更倾向于使用 OEA,而 AEA 在年轻患者中更为常见。尽管微创技术的趋势越来越明显,但 OEA 仍很普遍。要了解这些趋势的驱动因素,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of primary rotator cuff repair in non-diabetic patients using glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists: A propensity-matched analysis. Soft tissue reconstruction techniques for irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears: A systematic review of clinical outcomes. Removing the sling reduces pain immediately after shoulder surgery. Cost-effectiveness analysis of Latarjet versus arthroscopic Bankart with remplissage in anterior shoulder instability: A retrospective cohort study from Ecuador. Functional outcomes and reoperation rates following conversion of failed anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty to hemiarthroplasty: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1