Functional Assessment for Control of the Trunk Predicts Independent Walking in Patients with Stroke.

IF 1.8 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JMA journal Pub Date : 2025-01-15 Epub Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.31662/jmaj.2024-0212
Keisuke Sato, Takahiro Ogawa
{"title":"Functional Assessment for Control of the Trunk Predicts Independent Walking in Patients with Stroke.","authors":"Keisuke Sato, Takahiro Ogawa","doi":"10.31662/jmaj.2024-0212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examined the association of trunk function evaluated using Functional Assessment for Control of Trunk (FACT) with independent walking. It aimed to determine the effectiveness of the FACT cutoff score in predicting independent walking at hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included patients with cerebral infarction. The patients were categorized into the independent (Functional Independence Measure [FIM] locomotion walking score of the patient was ≥6; n = 102) and dependent (≤5; n = 111) groups based on the FIM locomotion scale at discharge. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to determine the significant independent variables on admission for predicting independent walking at discharge. Furthermore, the receiver operating characteristic was used to calculate the cutoff value for admission status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 213 patients (122 men and 91 women) were included in this study. The independent group had higher scores in FACT (15.0 [12.0-20.0] vs. 6.0 [2.0-12.0], <i>P</i> < 0.001) on admission than the dependent group. The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the factors associated with independent walking were the FACT and Mini-Mental State Examination-Japanese (MMSE-J) on admission. The optimal cutoff score for the FACT on admission was 8, and the area under the curve for the FACT scores on admission when discriminating between independent walking at discharge was 0.82.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study can facilitate the optimization of patient rehabilitation as early as possible. The effects of improved trunk function require further validation through prospective observational studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73550,"journal":{"name":"JMA journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"226-233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11799423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2024-0212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study examined the association of trunk function evaluated using Functional Assessment for Control of Trunk (FACT) with independent walking. It aimed to determine the effectiveness of the FACT cutoff score in predicting independent walking at hospital discharge.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients with cerebral infarction. The patients were categorized into the independent (Functional Independence Measure [FIM] locomotion walking score of the patient was ≥6; n = 102) and dependent (≤5; n = 111) groups based on the FIM locomotion scale at discharge. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to determine the significant independent variables on admission for predicting independent walking at discharge. Furthermore, the receiver operating characteristic was used to calculate the cutoff value for admission status.

Results: A total of 213 patients (122 men and 91 women) were included in this study. The independent group had higher scores in FACT (15.0 [12.0-20.0] vs. 6.0 [2.0-12.0], P < 0.001) on admission than the dependent group. The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the factors associated with independent walking were the FACT and Mini-Mental State Examination-Japanese (MMSE-J) on admission. The optimal cutoff score for the FACT on admission was 8, and the area under the curve for the FACT scores on admission when discriminating between independent walking at discharge was 0.82.

Conclusions: The results of this study can facilitate the optimization of patient rehabilitation as early as possible. The effects of improved trunk function require further validation through prospective observational studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
躯干控制功能评估预测脑卒中患者独立行走。
摘要:本研究探讨了用躯干控制功能评估(FACT)评估躯干功能与独立行走的关系。目的是确定FACT截止评分在预测出院时独立行走的有效性。方法:回顾性观察性研究纳入脑梗死患者。将患者分为独立(FIM)运动步行评分≥6分的患者;N = 102)和依赖(≤5;n = 111)组,基于出院时FIM运动量表。采用多因素logistic回归分析确定入院时的显著自变量,以预测出院时的独立行走。此外,接收机工作特性被用来计算接收状态的截止值。结果:共纳入213例患者,其中男性122例,女性91例。独立组入院时FACT评分(15.0 [12.0-20.0]vs. 6.0 [2.0-12.0], P < 0.001)高于依赖组。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,与独立行走相关的因素是入院时的FACT和日本迷你精神状态检查(MMSE-J)。入院时FACT的最佳临界值为8分,区分出院时独立行走时入院时FACT评分的曲线下面积为0.82。结论:本研究结果有助于尽早优化患者的康复。改善躯干功能的效果需要通过前瞻性观察研究进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors in Patient-Clinician Interactions That Influence the Decision-Making Process of Older Patients with Dementia. Recent Advances in Single-Cell Analysis of Atherosclerotic Plaque Biology. Does a Human-drafted Letter Edited by Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer Escape Detection by Artificial Intelligence Detectors? Reconsidering the Widespread Use of Active Vitamin D Analogues for Osteoporosis in Japan: A Call for Evidence-Based Prescription Practices. Empowering Young Physicians' Contributions in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1