SUBSCAPULAR INJURY: PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF PHYSICAL EXAMINATION, MRI AND ARTHROSCOPY.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Acta Ortopedica Brasileira Pub Date : 2025-02-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-785220253301e285935
Hélio Gonçalves Ribeiro, José Rodrigo Da Silva Ferreira, Flávio Wildon Dantas, Rodrigo De Araújo Santa Ritta
{"title":"SUBSCAPULAR INJURY: PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF PHYSICAL EXAMINATION, MRI AND ARTHROSCOPY.","authors":"Hélio Gonçalves Ribeiro, José Rodrigo Da Silva Ferreira, Flávio Wildon Dantas, Rodrigo De Araújo Santa Ritta","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220253301e285935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rotator cuff injury is the most frequent etiology of shoulder pain, with 24% of these injuries involving the subscapular tendon.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To correlate the findings of three clinical tests (Gerber test, Belly Press test, and Bear Hug test) with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and arthroscopic findings of subscapular lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cross-sectional study, from November 2023 to March 2024, with 50 patients with rotator cuff injury, evaluating sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy among clinical tests, MRI, and arthroscopic findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>50 patients formed the sample, with 29 (58%) men and 21 (42%) women aged 42 to 86 years. We found a specificity of 88% and an accuracy of 54% in MRI. Regarding the Gerber test, the Belly Press test, and the Bear Hug test, the sensitivity was 64%, 64%, and 76%, with specificity of 75% for the Gerber and Belly Press tests and accuracy of 74% for the Bear Hug test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We concluded that the Bear Hug test showed higher sensitivity and accuracy in detecting subscapular tendon lesions, with MRI being the most specific method. <b><i>Level of Evidence II; Prospective Study.</i></b></p>","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":"33 1","pages":"e285935"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220253301e285935","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rotator cuff injury is the most frequent etiology of shoulder pain, with 24% of these injuries involving the subscapular tendon.

Objective: To correlate the findings of three clinical tests (Gerber test, Belly Press test, and Bear Hug test) with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and arthroscopic findings of subscapular lesions.

Methods: Prospective cross-sectional study, from November 2023 to March 2024, with 50 patients with rotator cuff injury, evaluating sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy among clinical tests, MRI, and arthroscopic findings.

Results: 50 patients formed the sample, with 29 (58%) men and 21 (42%) women aged 42 to 86 years. We found a specificity of 88% and an accuracy of 54% in MRI. Regarding the Gerber test, the Belly Press test, and the Bear Hug test, the sensitivity was 64%, 64%, and 76%, with specificity of 75% for the Gerber and Belly Press tests and accuracy of 74% for the Bear Hug test.

Conclusion: We concluded that the Bear Hug test showed higher sensitivity and accuracy in detecting subscapular tendon lesions, with MRI being the most specific method. Level of Evidence II; Prospective Study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.
期刊最新文献
CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS IN MALIGNANT SPINAL TUMORS: A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS. DIAGNOSTIC COMPETENCE IN BONE TUMORS: INFLUENCE OF ONCO-ORTHOPEDIC TRAINING. FREQUENCY AND MODALITY OF EXERCISE ON PAIN AND INDEPENDENCE IN ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY. BEST PROSTHESIS FOR UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROSIS: FIXED OR MOBILE? PEDIATRIC FRACTURES IN A TERTIARY PUBLIC HOSPITAL: WHAT ARE WE DEALING WITH?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1