The reliability and validity of the Swedish translation of the Vertigo Symptom Scale - short form in a cohort with acute vestibular syndrome.

IF 4.3 Annals of medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1080/07853890.2025.2457517
Solmaz Surano, Erik Faergemann, Gabriel Granåsen, Jonatan Salzer
{"title":"The reliability and validity of the Swedish translation of the Vertigo Symptom Scale - short form in a cohort with acute vestibular syndrome.","authors":"Solmaz Surano, Erik Faergemann, Gabriel Granåsen, Jonatan Salzer","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2025.2457517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Vertigo Symptom Scale - short form (VSS-SF) is commonly used to measure dizziness and vertigo over the past month. This study aimed to (1) adapt the VSS-SF for the Swedish population and assess its psychometric properties, and (2) develop a modified version for measuring symptoms in the acute phase of acute vestibular syndrome (AVS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The VSS-SF was translated into Swedish and adapted cross-culturally. Its psychometric properties were evaluated in 86 AVS patients, both in the acute stage (1-7 days from symptom onset) with a modified acute version, and after six weeks of vestibular rehabilitation using the standard VSS-SF. Factor structure, convergent and discriminant validity, and internal consistency were analyzed. Test-retest reliability was assessed at six weeks. Participants were also evaluated with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and balance tests. Controls included 54 healthy participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure for both versions, corresponding to vertigo-balance (VSS-V) and autonomic-anxiety (VSS-A) subscales. Both versions demonstrated strong factor structures with adequate loadings. Internal consistency was high for the standard version (Cronbach's alpha 0.76 to 0.87) and for the total and VSS-V subscale of the acute version (0.82 and 0.85, respectively), but poor for the acute VSS-A subscale (0.50). Convergent validity was supported by Spearman's rank correlations. The discriminative ability was excellent for the acute VSS-SF and VSS-V (AUC 0.98 and 0.99), and acceptable for VSS-A (AUC 0.77). After six weeks, discriminative ability decreased but remained above 0.5. Test-retest reliability at six weeks was excellent for all scales (ICC 0.94, 0.93, and 0.93 for VSS-SF, VSS-V, and VSS-A).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The VSS-SF was successfully adapted for the Swedish population, including an acute version for early dizziness assessment. Both versions confirmed a robust two-factor structure, with the acute version showing excellent early discriminative ability, particularly for the vertigo-balance dimension. However, the autonomic-anxiety subscale showed weaker psychometric properties, suggesting limited suitability for AVS patients. The adapted scales show promise for clinical use in diagnosing and evaluating dizziness and vertigo in the Swedish population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT05056324, September 24, 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05056324.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"57 1","pages":"2457517"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2457517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Vertigo Symptom Scale - short form (VSS-SF) is commonly used to measure dizziness and vertigo over the past month. This study aimed to (1) adapt the VSS-SF for the Swedish population and assess its psychometric properties, and (2) develop a modified version for measuring symptoms in the acute phase of acute vestibular syndrome (AVS).

Methods: The VSS-SF was translated into Swedish and adapted cross-culturally. Its psychometric properties were evaluated in 86 AVS patients, both in the acute stage (1-7 days from symptom onset) with a modified acute version, and after six weeks of vestibular rehabilitation using the standard VSS-SF. Factor structure, convergent and discriminant validity, and internal consistency were analyzed. Test-retest reliability was assessed at six weeks. Participants were also evaluated with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and balance tests. Controls included 54 healthy participants.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure for both versions, corresponding to vertigo-balance (VSS-V) and autonomic-anxiety (VSS-A) subscales. Both versions demonstrated strong factor structures with adequate loadings. Internal consistency was high for the standard version (Cronbach's alpha 0.76 to 0.87) and for the total and VSS-V subscale of the acute version (0.82 and 0.85, respectively), but poor for the acute VSS-A subscale (0.50). Convergent validity was supported by Spearman's rank correlations. The discriminative ability was excellent for the acute VSS-SF and VSS-V (AUC 0.98 and 0.99), and acceptable for VSS-A (AUC 0.77). After six weeks, discriminative ability decreased but remained above 0.5. Test-retest reliability at six weeks was excellent for all scales (ICC 0.94, 0.93, and 0.93 for VSS-SF, VSS-V, and VSS-A).

Conclusions: The VSS-SF was successfully adapted for the Swedish population, including an acute version for early dizziness assessment. Both versions confirmed a robust two-factor structure, with the acute version showing excellent early discriminative ability, particularly for the vertigo-balance dimension. However, the autonomic-anxiety subscale showed weaker psychometric properties, suggesting limited suitability for AVS patients. The adapted scales show promise for clinical use in diagnosing and evaluating dizziness and vertigo in the Swedish population.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT05056324, September 24, 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05056324.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眩晕症状量表瑞典语翻译的信度和效度-短形式在急性前庭综合征队列中。
背景:眩晕症状量表-简短形式(VSS-SF)通常用于测量过去一个月的头晕和眩晕。本研究旨在(1)调整瑞典人群的VSS-SF,并评估其心理测量特性,(2)开发一个改进的版本,用于测量急性前庭综合征(AVS)急性期的症状。方法:将VSS-SF翻译成瑞典语并进行跨文化改编。在86例AVS患者中评估其心理测量特性,包括急性期(症状出现后1-7天)和使用标准VSS-SF进行6周前庭康复的患者。分析了因子结构、收敛效度和判别效度以及内部一致性。在6周时评估重测信度。参与者也被评估头晕障碍量表(DHI)和平衡测试。对照组包括54名健康参与者。结果:探索性因子分析揭示了两个版本的双因素结构,对应于眩晕平衡(VSS-V)和自主焦虑(VSS-A)分量表。这两个版本都表现出具有足够负载的强因子结构。标准版和急性版的总量表和VSS-V量表的内部一致性较高(分别为0.82和0.85),但急性版VSS-A量表的内部一致性较差(0.50)。收敛效度得到Spearman等级相关的支持。对急性VSS-SF和VSS-V的鉴别能力良好(AUC分别为0.98和0.99),对VSS-A的鉴别能力尚可(AUC为0.77)。6周后,辨别能力下降,但仍保持在0.5以上。所有量表在六周时的重测信度都很好(VSS-SF、VSS-V和VSS-A的ICC分别为0.94、0.93和0.93)。结论:VSS-SF已成功地适用于瑞典人群,包括用于早期头晕评估的急性版本。两个版本都证实了一个强大的双因素结构,急性版本表现出出色的早期判别能力,特别是在眩晕平衡维度。然而,自主焦虑分量表表现出较弱的心理测量特征,表明对AVS患者的适用性有限。调整后的量表在诊断和评估瑞典人群的头晕和眩晕方面显示出临床应用的希望。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov编号NCT05056324, 2021年9月24日。https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05056324。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Letter to the editor regarding: 'bidirectional association of daily steps with sarcopenia: a longitudinal study'. Global epidemiology of diabetes and prediabetes in lean or non-obese patients with NAFLD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Insulin-like growth factor-1/insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor signalling in macrophages facilitates recovery from acute lung injury. Optimizing immunotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: recent advances and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1