Erom Lucas Alves Freitas, Bruno Fernandes de Oliveira Santos
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in corticospinal tract segmentation using constrained spherical deconvolution.","authors":"Erom Lucas Alves Freitas, Bruno Fernandes de Oliveira Santos","doi":"10.25259/SNI_982_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tractography of cerebral white matter tracts is a technique with applications in neurosurgical planning and the diagnosis of neurological diseases. In this context, the approach based on the constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) algorithm allows for more efficient and plausible segmentations. This study aimed to compare two CSD techniques for corticospinal tract (CST) segmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined 40 diffusion-weighted images (DWIs) acquired at 7T from healthy participants in the human connectome project (HCP) and 12 clinical 1.5T DWIs from patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Tractography was performed using two techniques: regions of interest-based approach and an automatic approach using the TractSeg neural network. The volume of the CST segmented by the two methods was compared using the Dice similarity coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a low similarity between the CST volumes segmented by the two techniques (Dice index for the HCP: 0.479 ± 0.04; Dice index for the Clinical: 0.404 ± 0.08). However, both techniques achieved high levels of consistency in sequential measurements, with intraclass correlation coefficient values above 0.995 for all comparisons. In addition, all selected metrics showed significant differences when comparing the two techniques (HCP - volume <i>P</i> < 0.0001, fractional anisotropy [FA] <i>P</i> = 0.0061, mean diffusivity [MD] <i>P</i> < 0.0001; Clinical - volume <i>P</i> < 0.0001, FA <i>P</i> = 0.0018, MD <i>P</i> = 0.0018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both methods demonstrate a high degree of consistency; however, the automatic approach appears to be more consistent overall. When comparing the CST segmentations between the two methods, we observed only a moderate similarity and differences in all considered metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":"16 ","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11799708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_982_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Tractography of cerebral white matter tracts is a technique with applications in neurosurgical planning and the diagnosis of neurological diseases. In this context, the approach based on the constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) algorithm allows for more efficient and plausible segmentations. This study aimed to compare two CSD techniques for corticospinal tract (CST) segmentation.
Methods: This study examined 40 diffusion-weighted images (DWIs) acquired at 7T from healthy participants in the human connectome project (HCP) and 12 clinical 1.5T DWIs from patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Tractography was performed using two techniques: regions of interest-based approach and an automatic approach using the TractSeg neural network. The volume of the CST segmented by the two methods was compared using the Dice similarity coefficient.
Results: There was a low similarity between the CST volumes segmented by the two techniques (Dice index for the HCP: 0.479 ± 0.04; Dice index for the Clinical: 0.404 ± 0.08). However, both techniques achieved high levels of consistency in sequential measurements, with intraclass correlation coefficient values above 0.995 for all comparisons. In addition, all selected metrics showed significant differences when comparing the two techniques (HCP - volume P < 0.0001, fractional anisotropy [FA] P = 0.0061, mean diffusivity [MD] P < 0.0001; Clinical - volume P < 0.0001, FA P = 0.0018, MD P = 0.0018).
Conclusion: Both methods demonstrate a high degree of consistency; however, the automatic approach appears to be more consistent overall. When comparing the CST segmentations between the two methods, we observed only a moderate similarity and differences in all considered metrics.
背景:脑白质束束造影是一种在神经外科手术计划和神经系统疾病诊断中具有重要应用价值的技术。在这种情况下,基于约束球面反褶积(CSD)算法的方法允许更有效和合理的分割。本研究旨在比较两种CSD技术用于皮质脊髓束(CST)分割。方法:本研究检查了人类连接组项目(HCP)健康参与者在7T时获得的40张弥散加权图像(dwi)和接受神经外科手术患者的12张临床1.5T dwi。使用两种技术进行神经束造影:基于兴趣区域的方法和使用TractSeg神经网络的自动方法。使用Dice相似系数比较两种方法分割的CST的体积。结果:两种方法分割的CST体积相似度较低(HCP的Dice指数:0.479±0.04;临床的Dice指数:0.404±0.08)。然而,这两种技术在序列测量中都达到了高度的一致性,所有比较的类内相关系数值都在0.995以上。此外,在两种技术的比较中,所有选择的指标都显示出显著差异(HCP - volume P < 0.0001,分数各向异性[FA] P = 0.0061,平均扩散率[MD] P < 0.0001;临床容积P < 0.0001, FA P = 0.0018, MD P = 0.0018)。结论:两种方法具有高度的一致性;然而,总体而言,自动方法似乎更加一致。当比较两种方法之间的CST分割时,我们观察到在所有考虑的指标中只有适度的相似性和差异。