Inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis on mortality protection - making a long story short.

Paola Rogliani, Gan Marco Manzetti, Shima Gholamalishahi, Mona Bafadhel, Luigino Calzetta
{"title":"Inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis on mortality protection - making a long story short.","authors":"Paola Rogliani, Gan Marco Manzetti, Shima Gholamalishahi, Mona Bafadhel, Luigino Calzetta","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2025.2465853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, primarily due to persistent airflow limitation from tobacco and biomass smoke exposure. While inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with long-acting bronchodilators, namely long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-adrenoreceptor agonists (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), are recommended for symptom control and exacerbation reduction, their effect on mortality remains uncertain. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest potential mortality benefits with triple ICS/LABA/LAMA therapy, though findings are not definitive.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the impact of ICS-containing therapies on all-cause mortality in COPD. Searches were performed across ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS, focusing on RCTs measuring mortality as an efficacy outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42,784 COPD patients from five high-quality studies were included. Pairwise meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in all-cause mortality with ICS-containing therapies (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.95), particularly with ICS/LABA and ICS/LABA/LAMA combinations. The NMA ranked ICS/LABA/LAMA as the most effective treatment (SUCRA 0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides compelling evidence that ICS-containing therapies, particularly triple therapy, significantly reduce all-cause mortality in COPD patients. Future research should identify patient subgroups most likely to benefit while minimizing adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42024607568.</p>","PeriodicalId":94007,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2025.2465853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, primarily due to persistent airflow limitation from tobacco and biomass smoke exposure. While inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with long-acting bronchodilators, namely long-acting β2-adrenoreceptor agonists (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), are recommended for symptom control and exacerbation reduction, their effect on mortality remains uncertain. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest potential mortality benefits with triple ICS/LABA/LAMA therapy, though findings are not definitive.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the impact of ICS-containing therapies on all-cause mortality in COPD. Searches were performed across ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS, focusing on RCTs measuring mortality as an efficacy outcome.

Results: A total of 42,784 COPD patients from five high-quality studies were included. Pairwise meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in all-cause mortality with ICS-containing therapies (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.95), particularly with ICS/LABA and ICS/LABA/LAMA combinations. The NMA ranked ICS/LABA/LAMA as the most effective treatment (SUCRA 0.89).

Conclusions: This study provides compelling evidence that ICS-containing therapies, particularly triple therapy, significantly reduce all-cause mortality in COPD patients. Future research should identify patient subgroups most likely to benefit while minimizing adverse effects.

Registration: PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42024607568.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吸入皮质类固醇治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病:对死亡率保护的系统回顾和荟萃分析-长话短说。
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是世界范围内死亡的主要原因,主要是由于烟草和生物质烟雾暴露造成的持续气流限制。虽然吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)联合长效支气管扩张剂,即长效β2-肾上腺素受体激动剂(LABA)和长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)被推荐用于控制症状和减少恶化,但它们对死亡率的影响仍不确定。最近的随机对照试验(rct)表明,三重ICS/LABA/LAMA治疗可能降低死亡率,尽管研究结果并不确定。方法:我们进行了一项系统回顾和网络荟萃分析(NMA)来评估含ics疗法对COPD全因死亡率的影响。在ClinicalTrials.gov、Cochrane Library、EMBASE、MEDLINE和SCOPUS上进行了检索,重点关注将死亡率作为疗效结果的随机对照试验。结果:共纳入了来自5项高质量研究的42,784例COPD患者。两两荟萃分析显示,含ICS治疗的全因死亡率显著降低(RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.95),特别是ICS/LABA和ICS/LABA/LAMA联合治疗。NMA将ICS/LABA/LAMA评为最有效的治疗方法(SUCRA 0.89)。结论:本研究提供了令人信服的证据,表明含有ics的治疗,特别是三联治疗,可显著降低COPD患者的全因死亡率。未来的研究应确定最有可能受益的患者亚组,同时将不良反应降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Daytime sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and associated comorbidities. Pathological roles of transient receptor potential channels in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: special focus on cellular mechanisms. Current and future contributions of AI to pulmonary function test interpretation, diagnostic approaches, and predictions of disease progression. From lungs to brain: the neuroimmune impact of respiratory microbiota. Advances in biologic therapies for COPD: precision medicine approaches and implications for small-airway disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1