Inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis on mortality protection - making a long story short.

Paola Rogliani, Gan Marco Manzetti, Shima Gholamalishahi, Mona Bafadhel, Luigino Calzetta
{"title":"Inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis on mortality protection - making a long story short.","authors":"Paola Rogliani, Gan Marco Manzetti, Shima Gholamalishahi, Mona Bafadhel, Luigino Calzetta","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2025.2465853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, primarily due to persistent airflow limitation from tobacco and biomass smoke exposure. While inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with long-acting bronchodilators, namely long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-adrenoreceptor agonists (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), are recommended for symptom control and exacerbation reduction, their effect on mortality remains uncertain. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest potential mortality benefits with triple ICS/LABA/LAMA therapy, though findings are not definitive.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the impact of ICS-containing therapies on all-cause mortality in COPD. Searches were performed across ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS, focusing on RCTs measuring mortality as an efficacy outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42,784 COPD patients from five high-quality studies were included. Pairwise meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in all-cause mortality with ICS-containing therapies (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.95), particularly with ICS/LABA and ICS/LABA/LAMA combinations. The NMA ranked ICS/LABA/LAMA as the most effective treatment (SUCRA 0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides compelling evidence that ICS-containing therapies, particularly triple therapy, significantly reduce all-cause mortality in COPD patients. Future research should identify patient subgroups most likely to benefit while minimizing adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42024607568.</p>","PeriodicalId":94007,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2025.2465853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, primarily due to persistent airflow limitation from tobacco and biomass smoke exposure. While inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with long-acting bronchodilators, namely long-acting β2-adrenoreceptor agonists (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), are recommended for symptom control and exacerbation reduction, their effect on mortality remains uncertain. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest potential mortality benefits with triple ICS/LABA/LAMA therapy, though findings are not definitive.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the impact of ICS-containing therapies on all-cause mortality in COPD. Searches were performed across ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS, focusing on RCTs measuring mortality as an efficacy outcome.

Results: A total of 42,784 COPD patients from five high-quality studies were included. Pairwise meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in all-cause mortality with ICS-containing therapies (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.95), particularly with ICS/LABA and ICS/LABA/LAMA combinations. The NMA ranked ICS/LABA/LAMA as the most effective treatment (SUCRA 0.89).

Conclusions: This study provides compelling evidence that ICS-containing therapies, particularly triple therapy, significantly reduce all-cause mortality in COPD patients. Future research should identify patient subgroups most likely to benefit while minimizing adverse effects.

Registration: PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42024607568.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吸入皮质类固醇治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病:对死亡率保护的系统回顾和荟萃分析-长话短说。
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是世界范围内死亡的主要原因,主要是由于烟草和生物质烟雾暴露造成的持续气流限制。虽然吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)联合长效支气管扩张剂,即长效β2-肾上腺素受体激动剂(LABA)和长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)被推荐用于控制症状和减少恶化,但它们对死亡率的影响仍不确定。最近的随机对照试验(rct)表明,三重ICS/LABA/LAMA治疗可能降低死亡率,尽管研究结果并不确定。方法:我们进行了一项系统回顾和网络荟萃分析(NMA)来评估含ics疗法对COPD全因死亡率的影响。在ClinicalTrials.gov、Cochrane Library、EMBASE、MEDLINE和SCOPUS上进行了检索,重点关注将死亡率作为疗效结果的随机对照试验。结果:共纳入了来自5项高质量研究的42,784例COPD患者。两两荟萃分析显示,含ICS治疗的全因死亡率显著降低(RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.95),特别是ICS/LABA和ICS/LABA/LAMA联合治疗。NMA将ICS/LABA/LAMA评为最有效的治疗方法(SUCRA 0.89)。结论:本研究提供了令人信服的证据,表明含有ics的治疗,特别是三联治疗,可显著降低COPD患者的全因死亡率。未来的研究应确定最有可能受益的患者亚组,同时将不良反应降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Daytime sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and associated comorbidities. Current and future contributions of AI to pulmonary function test interpretation, diagnostic approaches, and predictions of disease progression. Pathological roles of transient receptor potential channels in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: special focus on cellular mechanisms. From lungs to brain: the neuroimmune impact of respiratory microbiota. Advances in biologic therapies for COPD: precision medicine approaches and implications for small-airway disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1