Simona Buscarnera, Marco Canevelli, Giuseppe Bruno, Valentina Garibotto, Giovanni Battista Frisoni, Federica Ribaldi
{"title":"Unraveling the link between frailty and Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers in patients with mild cognitive impairment","authors":"Simona Buscarnera, Marco Canevelli, Giuseppe Bruno, Valentina Garibotto, Giovanni Battista Frisoni, Federica Ribaldi","doi":"10.1007/s11357-025-01547-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Alzheimer’s disease (AD) can be identified through biomarkers of amyloid (A) and tau (T) pathology. Frailty, a measure of biological aging, could impact the association between AD neuropathology and its clinical manifestation. We aimed to investigate the relationship between frailty and AD biomarkers among people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) attending a university memory clinic. Data were collected from a cohort of patients with MCI at the Memory Center of Geneva University Hospital (Switzerland). Frailty was assessed using a 35-item Frailty Index (FI). A and T positivity were determined through amyloid and tau PET or CSF analysis. Participants were divided into two subgroups: (i) A + T + (both amyloid and tau positive) and (ii) E/N (either A + or T + , neither A + nor T +), including all other combinations of A/T status. We first explored the correlation between FI, age, and education. Demographics, FI scores, and neuropsychological test results were then compared between these two groups. Logistic regression models, adjusted for age, sex, and education were used to examine the association between FI and AT positivity. One hundred twenty patients were included. FI was positively correlated with age and inversely with education. A + T + patients exhibited lower FI scores compared to E/N participants (0.13 ± 0.10 vs. 0.15 ± 0.08, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Logistic regressions found a negative association between FI and A + T + (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.32–0.90; <i>p</i> = 0.02). Frailty is associated with a lower likelihood of AD biomarker positivity in patients with MCI. Frailty might reflect alternative pathophysiological mechanisms contributing to cognitive impairment. </p>","PeriodicalId":12730,"journal":{"name":"GeroScience","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeroScience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-025-01547-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) can be identified through biomarkers of amyloid (A) and tau (T) pathology. Frailty, a measure of biological aging, could impact the association between AD neuropathology and its clinical manifestation. We aimed to investigate the relationship between frailty and AD biomarkers among people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) attending a university memory clinic. Data were collected from a cohort of patients with MCI at the Memory Center of Geneva University Hospital (Switzerland). Frailty was assessed using a 35-item Frailty Index (FI). A and T positivity were determined through amyloid and tau PET or CSF analysis. Participants were divided into two subgroups: (i) A + T + (both amyloid and tau positive) and (ii) E/N (either A + or T + , neither A + nor T +), including all other combinations of A/T status. We first explored the correlation between FI, age, and education. Demographics, FI scores, and neuropsychological test results were then compared between these two groups. Logistic regression models, adjusted for age, sex, and education were used to examine the association between FI and AT positivity. One hundred twenty patients were included. FI was positively correlated with age and inversely with education. A + T + patients exhibited lower FI scores compared to E/N participants (0.13 ± 0.10 vs. 0.15 ± 0.08, p = 0.01). Logistic regressions found a negative association between FI and A + T + (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.32–0.90; p = 0.02). Frailty is associated with a lower likelihood of AD biomarker positivity in patients with MCI. Frailty might reflect alternative pathophysiological mechanisms contributing to cognitive impairment.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)可以通过淀粉样蛋白(A)和tau (T)病理学的生物标志物来识别。虚弱是一种生物衰老的指标,可能影响阿尔茨海默病神经病理与其临床表现之间的关系。我们的目的是调查在大学记忆诊所就诊的轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者中虚弱和AD生物标志物之间的关系。数据收集自日内瓦大学医院(瑞士)记忆中心的一组轻度认知损伤患者。虚弱程度采用35项虚弱指数(FI)进行评估。通过淀粉样蛋白和tau PET或CSF分析确定A和T阳性。参与者被分为两个亚组:(i) A + T +(淀粉样蛋白和tau蛋白均阳性)和(ii) E/N (A +或T +,既不是A +也不是T +),包括所有其他A/T状态的组合。我们首先探讨了FI、年龄和教育程度之间的相关性。然后比较两组的人口统计学、FI评分和神经心理测试结果。采用调整年龄、性别和教育程度的Logistic回归模型来检验FI和AT阳性之间的关系。纳入120例患者。FI与年龄正相关,与教育程度负相关。与E/N患者相比,A + T +患者的FI评分较低(0.13±0.10比0.15±0.08,p = 0.01)。Logistic回归发现FI与a + T +呈负相关(OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.32-0.90;p = 0.02)。MCI患者身体虚弱与AD生物标志物阳性的可能性较低有关。虚弱可能反映了导致认知障碍的其他病理生理机制。
GeroScienceMedicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
182
期刊介绍:
GeroScience is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles related to research in the biology of aging and research on biomedical applications that impact aging. The scope of articles to be considered include evolutionary biology, biophysics, genetics, genomics, proteomics, molecular biology, cell biology, biochemistry, endocrinology, immunology, physiology, pharmacology, neuroscience, and psychology.