A branch-and-price algorithm for fast and equitable last-mile relief aid distribution

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE European Journal of Operational Research Pub Date : 2025-07-16 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2025.01.032
Mahdi Mostajabdaveh , F. Sibel Salman , Walter J. Gutjahr
{"title":"A branch-and-price algorithm for fast and equitable last-mile relief aid distribution","authors":"Mahdi Mostajabdaveh ,&nbsp;F. Sibel Salman ,&nbsp;Walter J. Gutjahr","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2025.01.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The distribution of relief supplies to shelters is a critical aspect of post-disaster humanitarian logistics. In major disasters, prepositioned supplies often fall short of meeting all demands. We address the problem of planning vehicle routes from a distribution center to shelters while allocating limited relief supplies. To balance efficiency and equity, we formulate a bi-objective problem: minimizing a Gini-index-based measure of inequity in unsatisfied demand for fair distribution and minimizing total travel time for timely delivery. We propose a Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) model and use the <span><math><mi>ϵ</mi></math></span>-constraint method to handle the bi-objective nature. By deriving mathematical properties of the optimal solution, we introduce valid inequalities and design an algorithm for optimal delivery allocations given feasible vehicle routes. A branch-and-price (B&amp;P) algorithm is developed to solve the problem efficiently. Computational tests on realistic datasets from a past earthquake in Van, Turkey, and predicted data for Istanbul’s Kartal region show that the B&amp;P algorithm significantly outperforms commercial MIP solvers.Our bi-objective approach reduces aid distribution inequity by 34% without compromising efficiency. Results indicate that when time constraints are very loose or tight, lexicographic optimization prioritizing demand coverage over fairness is effective. For moderately restrictive time constraints, a balanced approach is essential to avoid inequitable outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55161,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Operational Research","volume":"324 2","pages":"Pages 522-537"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Operational Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722172500075X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The distribution of relief supplies to shelters is a critical aspect of post-disaster humanitarian logistics. In major disasters, prepositioned supplies often fall short of meeting all demands. We address the problem of planning vehicle routes from a distribution center to shelters while allocating limited relief supplies. To balance efficiency and equity, we formulate a bi-objective problem: minimizing a Gini-index-based measure of inequity in unsatisfied demand for fair distribution and minimizing total travel time for timely delivery. We propose a Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) model and use the ϵ-constraint method to handle the bi-objective nature. By deriving mathematical properties of the optimal solution, we introduce valid inequalities and design an algorithm for optimal delivery allocations given feasible vehicle routes. A branch-and-price (B&P) algorithm is developed to solve the problem efficiently. Computational tests on realistic datasets from a past earthquake in Van, Turkey, and predicted data for Istanbul’s Kartal region show that the B&P algorithm significantly outperforms commercial MIP solvers.Our bi-objective approach reduces aid distribution inequity by 34% without compromising efficiency. Results indicate that when time constraints are very loose or tight, lexicographic optimization prioritizing demand coverage over fairness is effective. For moderately restrictive time constraints, a balanced approach is essential to avoid inequitable outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最后一英里救援物资快速公平分配的分支-价格算法
向收容所分发救济物资是灾后人道主义后勤工作的一个关键方面。在重大灾害中,预先部署的物资往往无法满足所有需求。在分配有限的救援物资时,我们解决了规划从分发中心到避难所的车辆路线的问题。为了平衡效率和公平,我们制定了一个双目标问题:最小化基于基尼指数的不平等衡量标准,以满足公平分配的未满足需求,最小化及时交付的总旅行时间。我们提出了一个混合整数规划(MIP)模型,并使用ϵ-constraint方法来处理双目标性质。通过推导最优解的数学性质,引入有效不等式,设计了给定可行车辆路线的最优配送分配算法。为了有效地解决这一问题,提出了一种分支价格(B&;P)算法。对土耳其Van过去地震的真实数据集和伊斯坦布尔Kartal地区的预测数据进行的计算测试表明,B&;P算法明显优于商业MIP求解器。我们的双目标方法在不影响效率的情况下减少了34%的援助分配不平等。结果表明,当时间限制非常宽松或紧张时,词典优化优先考虑需求覆盖而不是公平性是有效的。对于适度严格的时间限制,必须采取平衡的办法,以避免不公平的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Operational Research
European Journal of Operational Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
786
审稿时长
8.2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Operational Research (EJOR) publishes high quality, original papers that contribute to the methodology of operational research (OR) and to the practice of decision making.
期刊最新文献
Recent developments in location-routing problems Super-efficiency in piecewise Cobb-Douglas technology with flexible endogenous direction Increasing competitiveness by imbalanced groups: The example of the 48-team FIFA World Cup A hybrid multi-layered ensemble model based on heterogeneous information network for small and medium-sized enterprise default prediction A global malmquist productivity index of athletics performance in olympic games
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1