Outcomes of after-hours surgeries performed under general anaesthesia: a South Korean nationwide cohort study

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1111/anae.16559
Tak Kyu Oh, In-Ae Song
{"title":"Outcomes of after-hours surgeries performed under general anaesthesia: a South Korean nationwide cohort study","authors":"Tak Kyu Oh,&nbsp;In-Ae Song","doi":"10.1111/anae.16559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The day of the week or time of day that surgery is performed may influence postoperative mortality or complications. We aimed to examine whether surgery under general anaesthesia performed after-hours was associated with increased rates of mortality and morbidity, compared with surgery performed in-hours.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This population-based cohort study obtained data for patients who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia from the National Health Insurance Service of South Korea. Propensity score-matched groups of patients who underwent surgery either in-hours (weekdays between 9.00 and 18.00) or after-hours (weekdays between 18.00 and 09.00 or on a weekend/holiday) were compared for 90-day and 1-year mortality, and the incidence postoperative complications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 1,416,844 patients were considered (63,567 in the after-hours group and 1,353,277 in the in-hours group) and after a 1:5 propensity score matching, 281,717 were included (57,497 in the after-hours group and 224,220 in the in-hours group). Patients in the after-hours group showed 3.58-fold (OR 3.58, 95%CI 3.47–3.69, p &lt; 0.001) and 2.51-fold (hazard ratio 2.51, 95%CI 2.46–2.57, p &lt; 0.001) higher 90-day and 1-year all-cause mortality rates, respectively, compared with those in the in-hours group. Patients in the after-hours group had a 2.14-fold (OR 2.14, 95%CI 2.10–2.19, p &lt; 0.001) greater incidence of postoperative complications compared with those in the in-hours group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>After-hours surgery was associated with a higher risk of death within 90 days, an increase in all-cause mortality after 1-year and a higher incidence of postoperative complications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"80 6","pages":"645-651"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16559","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The day of the week or time of day that surgery is performed may influence postoperative mortality or complications. We aimed to examine whether surgery under general anaesthesia performed after-hours was associated with increased rates of mortality and morbidity, compared with surgery performed in-hours.

Methods

This population-based cohort study obtained data for patients who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia from the National Health Insurance Service of South Korea. Propensity score-matched groups of patients who underwent surgery either in-hours (weekdays between 9.00 and 18.00) or after-hours (weekdays between 18.00 and 09.00 or on a weekend/holiday) were compared for 90-day and 1-year mortality, and the incidence postoperative complications.

Results

A total of 1,416,844 patients were considered (63,567 in the after-hours group and 1,353,277 in the in-hours group) and after a 1:5 propensity score matching, 281,717 were included (57,497 in the after-hours group and 224,220 in the in-hours group). Patients in the after-hours group showed 3.58-fold (OR 3.58, 95%CI 3.47–3.69, p < 0.001) and 2.51-fold (hazard ratio 2.51, 95%CI 2.46–2.57, p < 0.001) higher 90-day and 1-year all-cause mortality rates, respectively, compared with those in the in-hours group. Patients in the after-hours group had a 2.14-fold (OR 2.14, 95%CI 2.10–2.19, p < 0.001) greater incidence of postoperative complications compared with those in the in-hours group.

Discussion

After-hours surgery was associated with a higher risk of death within 90 days, an increase in all-cause mortality after 1-year and a higher incidence of postoperative complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全麻下进行的小时后手术的结果:一项韩国全国队列研究
手术的日期或时间可能会影响术后死亡率或并发症。我们的目的是研究与小时内手术相比,小时后进行全身麻醉手术是否与死亡率和发病率增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
期刊最新文献
Conscious sedation vs. general anaesthesia for the peri-operative management of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a reply. Interpreting the afternoon disadvantage: accounting for mediation, weighting and secular trends: a reply. Chronic pain after day-case surgery: the next challenge in the prevention of chronic post-surgical pain. Patient-reported outcomes, postoperative pain and pain relief after day-case surgery (POPPY): baseline data from day surgery practice in the UK. Patient-reported outcomes, postoperative pain and pain relief after day-case surgery (POPPY): chronic post-surgical pain prevalence and associations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1