Seismic collapse risk and performance factors assessment of RC dual lateral load-resisting system under far- and near-fault earthquake conditions

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structures Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108333
Mehrdad Farzi, Mohsen Tehranizadeh, Mohsen Khademi
{"title":"Seismic collapse risk and performance factors assessment of RC dual lateral load-resisting system under far- and near-fault earthquake conditions","authors":"Mehrdad Farzi,&nbsp;Mohsen Tehranizadeh,&nbsp;Mohsen Khademi","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the seismic collapse risk and performance factors of typical reinforced concrete (RC) buildings with a dual lateral load-resisting system, incorporating moment-resisting frames and shear walls, using the FEMA P-695 methodology. To achieve this, Six buildings, ranging from four to thirty stories, were designed in compliance with ASCE/SEI 7-16 and ACI 318-14 standards using the response spectrum method. Validated finite element models were developed in the OpenSees software to conduct nonlinear static and dynamic analyses, incorporating far- and near-field ground motion records as recommended by FEMA P-695. Key performance metrics, including maximum and residual inter-story drift ratios, collapse fragility curves, seismic performance factors, and collapse risk, were evaluated. The study revealed significant discrepancies between observed performance and current design standards for dual RC shear wall buildings. Notably, the overstrength factors for short-period and long-period performance groups (3.12 and 1.29 respectively) deviated from ASCE/SEI 7-16 standard values, with both overstrength and period-based ductility factors decreasing as building height increased. Despite adherence to ASCE/SEI 7-16 requirements, these buildings exhibited substantial collapse risks under both types of ground motion. Near-field conditions were particularly concerning, with collapse probabilities over a 50-year period ranging from 4.5% to 10.1%, significantly exceeding the 1% target. These findings highlight the need for refined seismic design approaches for RC shear wall buildings to improve performance across various seismic scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 108333"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235201242500147X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the seismic collapse risk and performance factors of typical reinforced concrete (RC) buildings with a dual lateral load-resisting system, incorporating moment-resisting frames and shear walls, using the FEMA P-695 methodology. To achieve this, Six buildings, ranging from four to thirty stories, were designed in compliance with ASCE/SEI 7-16 and ACI 318-14 standards using the response spectrum method. Validated finite element models were developed in the OpenSees software to conduct nonlinear static and dynamic analyses, incorporating far- and near-field ground motion records as recommended by FEMA P-695. Key performance metrics, including maximum and residual inter-story drift ratios, collapse fragility curves, seismic performance factors, and collapse risk, were evaluated. The study revealed significant discrepancies between observed performance and current design standards for dual RC shear wall buildings. Notably, the overstrength factors for short-period and long-period performance groups (3.12 and 1.29 respectively) deviated from ASCE/SEI 7-16 standard values, with both overstrength and period-based ductility factors decreasing as building height increased. Despite adherence to ASCE/SEI 7-16 requirements, these buildings exhibited substantial collapse risks under both types of ground motion. Near-field conditions were particularly concerning, with collapse probabilities over a 50-year period ranging from 4.5% to 10.1%, significantly exceeding the 1% target. These findings highlight the need for refined seismic design approaches for RC shear wall buildings to improve performance across various seismic scenarios.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
期刊最新文献
Concrete Damaged Plasticity (CDP) adjustment parameters for the application in simulations of timber or wood composite structures Experimental and numerical research on hysteretic behavior of bolted end-plate connections Seismic response analysis of an unequal height multi-tower structure with connecting corridor Stress-strain model for mild steel considering cold-forming effect—A consistent approach A modified scaling line-based SBFEM for buckling analysis of variable thickness beams under axial compression loading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1