Design methodology and seismic performance testing of prefabricated RCS hybrid frame considering composite effects of slabs

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structures Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108431
Youshan Zhao , Xingqian Li , Xizhi Zhang , Shimin Huang , Weimin Chen
{"title":"Design methodology and seismic performance testing of prefabricated RCS hybrid frame considering composite effects of slabs","authors":"Youshan Zhao ,&nbsp;Xingqian Li ,&nbsp;Xizhi Zhang ,&nbsp;Shimin Huang ,&nbsp;Weimin Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reinforced concrete column–steel beam (RCS) hybrid frames are an innovative structural system that integrates steel beams and reinforced concrete columns, thereby offering an efficient structural system for modern buildings. However, the influence of the composite effect of the slab on the seismic behaviour has not been fully investigated in current designs. This study introduces a novel prefabricated RCS hybrid frame that explicitly considers slab composite effects and evaluates its seismic performance. A ½–scale one–bay two–storey precast composite column–steel hybrid frame is designed and tested under cyclic loading. The crack propagation, damage progression, failure modes, hysteresis performance, load–bearing capacity, stiffness, deformation, and energy dissipation, among other seismic performance metrics, are analysed. Experimental results indicate that the hybrid frame remains elastic under an overall drift ratio of 0.25 % and achieves an ultimate overall drift ratio of 3.76 %. Additionally, the panel zone remains in an elastic state during loading, with the structure demonstrating favourable plastic deformation and energy dissipation. Results of finite–element analysis indicate that considering the slab composite effects resulted in a 74 % increase in the lateral stiffness and a 44 % increase in the maximum load–bearing capacity. These findings validate the favourable seismic performance of the proposed RCS hybrid frame system and provide valuable scientific and technical insights for optimising such structural designs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 108431"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425002450","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reinforced concrete column–steel beam (RCS) hybrid frames are an innovative structural system that integrates steel beams and reinforced concrete columns, thereby offering an efficient structural system for modern buildings. However, the influence of the composite effect of the slab on the seismic behaviour has not been fully investigated in current designs. This study introduces a novel prefabricated RCS hybrid frame that explicitly considers slab composite effects and evaluates its seismic performance. A ½–scale one–bay two–storey precast composite column–steel hybrid frame is designed and tested under cyclic loading. The crack propagation, damage progression, failure modes, hysteresis performance, load–bearing capacity, stiffness, deformation, and energy dissipation, among other seismic performance metrics, are analysed. Experimental results indicate that the hybrid frame remains elastic under an overall drift ratio of 0.25 % and achieves an ultimate overall drift ratio of 3.76 %. Additionally, the panel zone remains in an elastic state during loading, with the structure demonstrating favourable plastic deformation and energy dissipation. Results of finite–element analysis indicate that considering the slab composite effects resulted in a 74 % increase in the lateral stiffness and a 44 % increase in the maximum load–bearing capacity. These findings validate the favourable seismic performance of the proposed RCS hybrid frame system and provide valuable scientific and technical insights for optimising such structural designs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑楼板复合效应的预制RCS混合框架设计方法及抗震性能试验
钢筋混凝土柱-钢梁混合框架是一种将钢梁和钢筋混凝土柱结合在一起的创新结构体系,为现代建筑提供了一种高效的结构体系。然而,在目前的设计中,楼板的复合效应对抗震性能的影响尚未得到充分的研究。本文介绍了一种新型预制RCS混合框架,该框架明确考虑了板的复合效应,并对其抗震性能进行了评估。设计了一种1 / 2比例尺的单层两层预制组合柱-钢混合动力框架,并进行了循环荷载试验。分析了裂纹扩展、损伤进展、破坏模式、迟滞性能、承载能力、刚度、变形和能量耗散以及其他抗震性能指标。试验结果表明,混合框架在总漂移比为0.25 %时仍保持弹性,最终总漂移比为3.76 %。此外,面板区域在加载过程中保持弹性状态,结构表现出良好的塑性变形和能量耗散。有限元分析结果表明,考虑楼板复合效应后,横向刚度提高74 %,最大承载能力提高44 %。这些发现验证了所提出的RCS混合框架系统的良好抗震性能,并为优化此类结构设计提供了宝贵的科学和技术见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
期刊最新文献
Multi-mode vertical vibration control of bridges under harmonic excitation using a nonlinear energy sink High-fidelity finite element modeling of the progressive collapse of reinforced concrete frame structures caused by truck collisions Seismic fragility analysis of masonry structures based on equivalent diagonal strut model and vector-valued intensity measures Mechanical properties of grade 2060 HSSWs for bridge cables under and after elevated temperatures An efficient regional seismic response analysis method considering building irregularity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1