The impact of resection margin status according to lymph node metastasis on the survival outcome of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116236
Poowanai Sarkhampee, Weeris Ouransatien, Satsawat Chansitthichok, Nithi Lertsawatvicha, Paiwan Wattanarath
{"title":"The impact of resection margin status according to lymph node metastasis on the survival outcome of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma","authors":"Poowanai Sarkhampee,&nbsp;Weeris Ouransatien,&nbsp;Satsawat Chansitthichok,&nbsp;Nithi Lertsawatvicha,&nbsp;Paiwan Wattanarath","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) included resection margin (RM) and lymph node metastases (LNM). Nevertheless, the advantage associated with a negative RM in patients with LNM remains unresolved.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study retrospectively analyzed patients with pCCA underwent curative-intent resection between October 2013 and December 2018. The evaluation of the OS was conducted based on the presence of LNM and the status of RM.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 167 resected pCCA patients, 87 (52.1 ​%) were LNM negative, and 80 (47.9 ​%) were LNM positive. Of the 87 LNM-negative patients, 68 (78.2 ​%) were R0 resections, and 19 (21.8 ​%) were R1 resections. In LNM-negative patients, the OS was longer in the R0 resection than the R1 resection group (median survival time (MST) of 32.1 vs 15.7 months, respectively; p ​&lt; ​0.001). Of the 80 LNM-positive patients, 35 were R0 resections and 45 were R1 resections. Among patients with LNM positivity, the OS rates were similar between the groups who underwent R1 resection and R0 resection (MST of 8.4 vs 8.0 months, respectively; p ​= ​0.109).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In patients with pCCA, the RM status was the most important prognostic factor for LNM-negative patients. However, there was no impact in LNM-positive patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"242 ","pages":"Article 116236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025000583","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) included resection margin (RM) and lymph node metastases (LNM). Nevertheless, the advantage associated with a negative RM in patients with LNM remains unresolved.

Methods

The study retrospectively analyzed patients with pCCA underwent curative-intent resection between October 2013 and December 2018. The evaluation of the OS was conducted based on the presence of LNM and the status of RM.

Results

Of the 167 resected pCCA patients, 87 (52.1 ​%) were LNM negative, and 80 (47.9 ​%) were LNM positive. Of the 87 LNM-negative patients, 68 (78.2 ​%) were R0 resections, and 19 (21.8 ​%) were R1 resections. In LNM-negative patients, the OS was longer in the R0 resection than the R1 resection group (median survival time (MST) of 32.1 vs 15.7 months, respectively; p ​< ​0.001). Of the 80 LNM-positive patients, 35 were R0 resections and 45 were R1 resections. Among patients with LNM positivity, the OS rates were similar between the groups who underwent R1 resection and R0 resection (MST of 8.4 vs 8.0 months, respectively; p ​= ​0.109).

Conclusion

In patients with pCCA, the RM status was the most important prognostic factor for LNM-negative patients. However, there was no impact in LNM-positive patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Trends in use of outpatient minimally-invasive adrenalectomy: A population-based analysis Colorectal cancer care equity in underserved communities: Innovative solutions for screening, outreach & capacity in rural Washington “Sucking the trouble” out of troubleshooting wound vacs: Video based curriculum development and implementation in a live tissue model Continuous intraoperative AI monitoring of surgical technical skills using computer vision. Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1