Robert J. Orpet, R. T. Curtiss, Katlyn A. Catron, S. Tianna DuPont, Elizabeth H. Beers, Louis B. Nottingham
{"title":"Inoculation and conservation of the biocontrol agent European earwig in Washington pear orchards","authors":"Robert J. Orpet, R. T. Curtiss, Katlyn A. Catron, S. Tianna DuPont, Elizabeth H. Beers, Louis B. Nottingham","doi":"10.1111/eea.13536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>European earwig, <i>Forficula auricularia</i> L. sensu lato (Dermaptera: Forficulidae), is a univoltine, resident, omnivorous species and a beneficial predator in pome fruit orchards. Here, three methods were used to investigate pear (<i>Pyrus communis</i> L., Rosaceae) orchard inoculation with European earwig for biocontrol of pear psylla, <i>Cacopsylla pyricola</i> (Foerster) (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), in Washington State, USA. The first method was earwig inoculation experiments. In a first experiment (2019–2020), each of three orchards had one inoculation and one control plot. In a second experiment (2020–2021), there were four inoculation and four control plots in each of the same three orchards. In both experiments, earwigs persisted during the year of inoculation, but earwigs were nearly absent the following season at two orchards that used conventional broad-spectrum pesticides. At the third orchard, which excluded broad-spectrum pesticides under an integrated pest management (IPM) program, earwigs became abundant in year two of the second experiment. The second method was case studies. In the first of two case studies, during 2016, 2017, 2022, and 2023, in half of the integrated orchard from above, conventional broad-spectrum sprays were used. Earwig populations became low in the conventional half. In the second case study, earwigs became abundant after inoculation of an integrated orchard by the grower. Earwigs spread to the edge of the orchard in year two and spilled into a neighboring orchard in years three and four. The third method was an observational study of 36 pear orchards over 5 years. Earwigs were rarely found in conventionally sprayed orchards, and earwigs increased each additional year integrated management was used. The findings suggest conventional pear spray programs in Washington nearly eradicate earwigs, but populations can recover under integrated management with natural dispersal from refuges or with inoculative releases.</p>","PeriodicalId":11741,"journal":{"name":"Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata","volume":"173 3","pages":"246-259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eea.13536","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eea.13536","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
European earwig, Forficula auricularia L. sensu lato (Dermaptera: Forficulidae), is a univoltine, resident, omnivorous species and a beneficial predator in pome fruit orchards. Here, three methods were used to investigate pear (Pyrus communis L., Rosaceae) orchard inoculation with European earwig for biocontrol of pear psylla, Cacopsylla pyricola (Foerster) (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), in Washington State, USA. The first method was earwig inoculation experiments. In a first experiment (2019–2020), each of three orchards had one inoculation and one control plot. In a second experiment (2020–2021), there were four inoculation and four control plots in each of the same three orchards. In both experiments, earwigs persisted during the year of inoculation, but earwigs were nearly absent the following season at two orchards that used conventional broad-spectrum pesticides. At the third orchard, which excluded broad-spectrum pesticides under an integrated pest management (IPM) program, earwigs became abundant in year two of the second experiment. The second method was case studies. In the first of two case studies, during 2016, 2017, 2022, and 2023, in half of the integrated orchard from above, conventional broad-spectrum sprays were used. Earwig populations became low in the conventional half. In the second case study, earwigs became abundant after inoculation of an integrated orchard by the grower. Earwigs spread to the edge of the orchard in year two and spilled into a neighboring orchard in years three and four. The third method was an observational study of 36 pear orchards over 5 years. Earwigs were rarely found in conventionally sprayed orchards, and earwigs increased each additional year integrated management was used. The findings suggest conventional pear spray programs in Washington nearly eradicate earwigs, but populations can recover under integrated management with natural dispersal from refuges or with inoculative releases.
欧洲蠼螋,Forficula auricularia L. sensu lato(皮翅目:forficulia dae))是一种单栖、杂食性的常住种,是梨树果园的有益捕食者。采用3种方法,对美国华盛顿地区梨树(Pyrus communis L.,蔷薇科)果园接种欧洲蠼螋防治梨树木虱(半翅目:木虱科)的效果进行了研究。第一种方法是土蜈蚣接种试验。第一期试验(2019-2020年),3个果园各接种1株,对照1块。在第二个试验(2020-2021)中,在相同的3个果园中,每个果园有4个接种和4个对照。在两项实验中,土蜈蚣在接种的那一年都存在,但在使用常规广谱农药的两个果园里,土蜈蚣在接下来的季节几乎没有出现。在第三个果园,在综合虫害管理(IPM)计划下不使用广谱农药,土蜈蚣在第二个实验的第二年变得丰富。第二种方法是案例研究。在2016年、2017年、2022年和2023年的第一个案例研究中,在一半的综合果园中使用了传统的广谱喷雾剂。土蜈蚣的数量在传统的一半变得很低。在第二个案例研究中,土蠼螋在种植者接种综合果园后变得丰富。第二年,蠼螋蔓延到果园的边缘,第三年和第四年又蔓延到邻近的果园里。第三种方法是对36个梨园进行5年的观察研究。在常规喷洒的果园中很少发现土蜈蚣,采用综合治理后土蜈蚣数量逐年增加。研究结果表明,在华盛顿,传统的梨花喷雾计划几乎可以消灭土蜈蚣,但在综合管理下,通过从避难所自然分散或接种释放,土蜈蚣的数量可以恢复。
期刊介绍:
Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata publishes top quality original research papers in the fields of experimental biology and ecology of insects and other terrestrial arthropods, with both pure and applied scopes. Mini-reviews, technical notes and media reviews are also published. Although the scope of the journal covers the entire scientific field of entomology, it has established itself as the preferred medium for the communication of results in the areas of the physiological, ecological, and morphological inter-relations between phytophagous arthropods and their food plants, their parasitoids, predators, and pathogens. Examples of specific areas that are covered frequently are:
host-plant selection mechanisms
chemical and sensory ecology and infochemicals
parasitoid-host interactions
behavioural ecology
biosystematics
(co-)evolution
migration and dispersal
population modelling
sampling strategies
developmental and behavioural responses to photoperiod and temperature
nutrition
natural and transgenic plant resistance.