Patient Factors That Impact FACE-Q Aesthetics Outcomes: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Regression Analysis.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Aesthetic Surgery Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1093/asj/sjaf027
Lucas Gallo, Isabella Churchill, Patrick Kim, Charlene Rae, Sophocles H Voineskos, Achilles Thoma, Andrea L Pusic, Stefan J Cano, Anne F Klassen
{"title":"Patient Factors That Impact FACE-Q Aesthetics Outcomes: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Regression Analysis.","authors":"Lucas Gallo, Isabella Churchill, Patrick Kim, Charlene Rae, Sophocles H Voineskos, Achilles Thoma, Andrea L Pusic, Stefan J Cano, Anne F Klassen","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The FACE-Q Aesthetics is a validated tool for assessing patient-reported outcomes related to surgical and non-surgical facial aesthetic treatments. Recognizing patient-specific variables that may influence FACE-Q scores is essential to control for potential confounders in research.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify factors that predict FACE-Q Aesthetic scale scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among an international cohort of participants recruited through the Prolific platform. Participants aged 20 years or older who had undergone non-invasive facial aesthetic procedures within the past year were included. Demographic and clinical information was collected, and univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were employed to assess predictors of FACE-Q Face Overall, Psychological, and Social scale scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,259 participants were analyzed, with an average age of 42.6 years (±11.9). The mean scores were 52.4 (±18.3) for the Face Overall scale, 56.5 (±23.7) for the Psychological scale, and 62.7 (±24.0) for the Social scale. Several factors were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with higher scores, including lower body mass index (BMI), African American ethnicity, male gender, Fitzpatrick skin type V, residence in the United States, financial stability, and residual effects of prior aesthetic treatments. Younger participants were more likely to report higher Face Overall scores (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified several patient characteristics that predict Face Overall, Psychological, and Social scale scores. These findings offer valuable insights into how patient-specific factors influence outcomes following facial aesthetic procedures and underscore the need to account for these variables in future research using the FACE-Q Aesthetics tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The FACE-Q Aesthetics is a validated tool for assessing patient-reported outcomes related to surgical and non-surgical facial aesthetic treatments. Recognizing patient-specific variables that may influence FACE-Q scores is essential to control for potential confounders in research.

Objectives: This study aimed to identify factors that predict FACE-Q Aesthetic scale scores.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among an international cohort of participants recruited through the Prolific platform. Participants aged 20 years or older who had undergone non-invasive facial aesthetic procedures within the past year were included. Demographic and clinical information was collected, and univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were employed to assess predictors of FACE-Q Face Overall, Psychological, and Social scale scores.

Results: A total of 1,259 participants were analyzed, with an average age of 42.6 years (±11.9). The mean scores were 52.4 (±18.3) for the Face Overall scale, 56.5 (±23.7) for the Psychological scale, and 62.7 (±24.0) for the Social scale. Several factors were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with higher scores, including lower body mass index (BMI), African American ethnicity, male gender, Fitzpatrick skin type V, residence in the United States, financial stability, and residual effects of prior aesthetic treatments. Younger participants were more likely to report higher Face Overall scores (p<0.05).

Conclusions: This study identified several patient characteristics that predict Face Overall, Psychological, and Social scale scores. These findings offer valuable insights into how patient-specific factors influence outcomes following facial aesthetic procedures and underscore the need to account for these variables in future research using the FACE-Q Aesthetics tool.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响 FACE-Q 美学结果的患者因素:探索性横截面回归分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Breast Pocket Lavage With Clindamycin Solution for Silicone Removal After Implant Rupture. Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) in 252 Board-Certified Plastic Surgeons: Prevalences, ACE Clustering, and Effects on Adult Health and Behaviors, Including Self-Defined Depression, Work Addiction, and Burnout. IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Upper Facial Lines: Results From Two Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Studies. Smartphone Evaluation of Dynamic and Static Naturalness After Double-Eyelid Blepharoplasty. The Gliding Brow Lift: An Analysis of Outcomes and Maintenance of Lift in a Single Surgeon's Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1