Lucas Gallo, Isabella Churchill, Patrick Kim, Charlene Rae, Sophocles H Voineskos, Achilles Thoma, Andrea L Pusic, Stefan J Cano, Anne F Klassen
{"title":"Patient Factors That Impact FACE-Q Aesthetics Outcomes: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Regression Analysis.","authors":"Lucas Gallo, Isabella Churchill, Patrick Kim, Charlene Rae, Sophocles H Voineskos, Achilles Thoma, Andrea L Pusic, Stefan J Cano, Anne F Klassen","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The FACE-Q Aesthetics is a validated tool for assessing patient-reported outcomes related to surgical and non-surgical facial aesthetic treatments. Recognizing patient-specific variables that may influence FACE-Q scores is essential to control for potential confounders in research.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify factors that predict FACE-Q Aesthetic scale scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among an international cohort of participants recruited through the Prolific platform. Participants aged 20 years or older who had undergone non-invasive facial aesthetic procedures within the past year were included. Demographic and clinical information was collected, and univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were employed to assess predictors of FACE-Q Face Overall, Psychological, and Social scale scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,259 participants were analyzed, with an average age of 42.6 years (±11.9). The mean scores were 52.4 (±18.3) for the Face Overall scale, 56.5 (±23.7) for the Psychological scale, and 62.7 (±24.0) for the Social scale. Several factors were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with higher scores, including lower body mass index (BMI), African American ethnicity, male gender, Fitzpatrick skin type V, residence in the United States, financial stability, and residual effects of prior aesthetic treatments. Younger participants were more likely to report higher Face Overall scores (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified several patient characteristics that predict Face Overall, Psychological, and Social scale scores. These findings offer valuable insights into how patient-specific factors influence outcomes following facial aesthetic procedures and underscore the need to account for these variables in future research using the FACE-Q Aesthetics tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The FACE-Q Aesthetics is a validated tool for assessing patient-reported outcomes related to surgical and non-surgical facial aesthetic treatments. Recognizing patient-specific variables that may influence FACE-Q scores is essential to control for potential confounders in research.
Objectives: This study aimed to identify factors that predict FACE-Q Aesthetic scale scores.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among an international cohort of participants recruited through the Prolific platform. Participants aged 20 years or older who had undergone non-invasive facial aesthetic procedures within the past year were included. Demographic and clinical information was collected, and univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were employed to assess predictors of FACE-Q Face Overall, Psychological, and Social scale scores.
Results: A total of 1,259 participants were analyzed, with an average age of 42.6 years (±11.9). The mean scores were 52.4 (±18.3) for the Face Overall scale, 56.5 (±23.7) for the Psychological scale, and 62.7 (±24.0) for the Social scale. Several factors were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with higher scores, including lower body mass index (BMI), African American ethnicity, male gender, Fitzpatrick skin type V, residence in the United States, financial stability, and residual effects of prior aesthetic treatments. Younger participants were more likely to report higher Face Overall scores (p<0.05).
Conclusions: This study identified several patient characteristics that predict Face Overall, Psychological, and Social scale scores. These findings offer valuable insights into how patient-specific factors influence outcomes following facial aesthetic procedures and underscore the need to account for these variables in future research using the FACE-Q Aesthetics tool.
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.