Combustion characteristics, functional groups, and gaseous emission behavior of different coals by TG-FTIR.

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science and Pollution Research Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1007/s11356-025-36065-4
Chunxiang Chen, Shuo Qin, Jundong Zhu, Lihui He, Bingjie Li, Wenda Wang, Zhulin He
{"title":"Combustion characteristics, functional groups, and gaseous emission behavior of different coals by TG-FTIR.","authors":"Chunxiang Chen, Shuo Qin, Jundong Zhu, Lihui He, Bingjie Li, Wenda Wang, Zhulin He","doi":"10.1007/s11356-025-36065-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The combustion characteristics and gas emissions behavior of Low-calorie Indonesian coal (LC), Shaanxi coal (SC), and Datong coal (TC) were analyzed by a thermogravimetric-Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (TG-FTIR). The results showed that LC was the easiest coal to burn, followed by SC and TC. The main components of LC ash were alkali metals and alkaline earth metals (AAEMS), while SC and TC were clay minerals. The catalytic activity of LC ash was higher than that of SC and TC ash. FTIR results indicated that the main functional groups of three coals were CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, H<sub>2</sub>O, phenols, C = O, and C-H during combustion. The absorbance peaks of CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, SO<sub>2</sub>, and HCN against temperature showed single peak characteristics, while NO<sub>x</sub> was the bimodal peak. The total CO<sub>2</sub> emission of LC was 1.04 and 1.25 times that of SC and TC. Compared to LC and SC, TC had the highest total CO and SO<sub>2</sub> emissions. The total NO<sub>x</sub> emission of LC, SC, and TC was 0.21, 0.21, and 0.16. The study results provide the guidance for selection of coals and control the emission of gas products in the thermal power plant.</p>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36065-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The combustion characteristics and gas emissions behavior of Low-calorie Indonesian coal (LC), Shaanxi coal (SC), and Datong coal (TC) were analyzed by a thermogravimetric-Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (TG-FTIR). The results showed that LC was the easiest coal to burn, followed by SC and TC. The main components of LC ash were alkali metals and alkaline earth metals (AAEMS), while SC and TC were clay minerals. The catalytic activity of LC ash was higher than that of SC and TC ash. FTIR results indicated that the main functional groups of three coals were CO2, CO, H2O, phenols, C = O, and C-H during combustion. The absorbance peaks of CO2, CO, SO2, and HCN against temperature showed single peak characteristics, while NOx was the bimodal peak. The total CO2 emission of LC was 1.04 and 1.25 times that of SC and TC. Compared to LC and SC, TC had the highest total CO and SO2 emissions. The total NOx emission of LC, SC, and TC was 0.21, 0.21, and 0.16. The study results provide the guidance for selection of coals and control the emission of gas products in the thermal power plant.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
期刊最新文献
Comment on "An examination of daily CO2 emissions prediction through a comparative analysis of machine learning, deep learning, and statistical models". Comments on "Research trends on the relationship between air pollution and cardiovascular diseases in 2013-2022 - A scientometric analysis". Correction to: Editorial trend: adverse outcome pathway (AOP) and computational strategy - towards new perspectives in ecotoxicology. Enhancing drought monitoring with a multivariate hydrometeorological index and machine learning-based prediction in the south of Iran. Photocatalytic degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons under visible light irradiation in water using TiO2/MgO nanocomposites.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1