Sickness absence among privately employed white-collar workers during the COVID-19 pandemic; a prospective cohort study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-21566-1
Kristin Farrants, Mira Müller, Kristina Alexanderson
{"title":"Sickness absence among privately employed white-collar workers during the COVID-19 pandemic; a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Kristin Farrants, Mira Müller, Kristina Alexanderson","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-21566-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic brought with it several changes, both regarding infection with COVID-19 itself as well as measures to combat the spread of infection, that might have affected sickness absence (SA) patterns. The aim was to explore whether incidence and length of SA changed between 2019, 2020, and 2021, as well as to determine factors associated with SA due to COVID-19 or COVID-like diagnoses among privately employed white-collar workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of all privately employed white-collar workers in 2018 in Sweden (n = 1 347 778; 47% women) was followed prospectively during 2019, 2020, and 2021 using linked nationwide register data. We calculated numbers and proportions of people with incident SA (in SA spells > 14 days) due to COVID-19, COVID-like diagnoses (certain respiratory, infectious, and symptom-based diagnoses used in the beginning of the pandemic for suspected COVID-19), and all other SA, respectively, and mean number of SA days with somatic and mental diagnoses. Logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals for associations between prior diagnosis-specific SA, sociodemographic and work-related factors and incident SA due to COVID-19 or COVID-like diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2020, 0.6% of the women and 0.3% of the men had incident SA due to COVID-19. For SA with COVID-like diagnoses, the corresponding proportions were 1.2% and 0.5%. The proportion of people with all other SA was stable across the years, at 8.1-8.4% for women and 3.7-3.9% for men. The mean number of SA days per person increased each year for somatic diagnoses but for mental diagnoses it decreased from 2019 to 2020 and increased to 2021 among women and men. Factors associated most strongly with incident SA due to COVID-19 or COVID-like diagnoses were low income (adjusted OR-range 1.36-5.67 compared to the highest income group) and prior SA due to COVID-like diagnoses (OR-range 4.67-5.31 compared to those with no such prior SA).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A small proportion of privately-employed white-collar workers had incident SA spells > 14 days due to COVID-19 or COVID-like diagnoses. The factors associated with SA due to COVID-19 were similar to factors associated with SA due to other diagnoses in previous studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"548"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21566-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic brought with it several changes, both regarding infection with COVID-19 itself as well as measures to combat the spread of infection, that might have affected sickness absence (SA) patterns. The aim was to explore whether incidence and length of SA changed between 2019, 2020, and 2021, as well as to determine factors associated with SA due to COVID-19 or COVID-like diagnoses among privately employed white-collar workers.

Methods: A cohort of all privately employed white-collar workers in 2018 in Sweden (n = 1 347 778; 47% women) was followed prospectively during 2019, 2020, and 2021 using linked nationwide register data. We calculated numbers and proportions of people with incident SA (in SA spells > 14 days) due to COVID-19, COVID-like diagnoses (certain respiratory, infectious, and symptom-based diagnoses used in the beginning of the pandemic for suspected COVID-19), and all other SA, respectively, and mean number of SA days with somatic and mental diagnoses. Logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals for associations between prior diagnosis-specific SA, sociodemographic and work-related factors and incident SA due to COVID-19 or COVID-like diagnoses.

Results: In 2020, 0.6% of the women and 0.3% of the men had incident SA due to COVID-19. For SA with COVID-like diagnoses, the corresponding proportions were 1.2% and 0.5%. The proportion of people with all other SA was stable across the years, at 8.1-8.4% for women and 3.7-3.9% for men. The mean number of SA days per person increased each year for somatic diagnoses but for mental diagnoses it decreased from 2019 to 2020 and increased to 2021 among women and men. Factors associated most strongly with incident SA due to COVID-19 or COVID-like diagnoses were low income (adjusted OR-range 1.36-5.67 compared to the highest income group) and prior SA due to COVID-like diagnoses (OR-range 4.67-5.31 compared to those with no such prior SA).

Conclusions: A small proportion of privately-employed white-collar workers had incident SA spells > 14 days due to COVID-19 or COVID-like diagnoses. The factors associated with SA due to COVID-19 were similar to factors associated with SA due to other diagnoses in previous studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎大流行期间私营白领病假情况分析一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:COVID-19大流行带来了一些变化,既涉及COVID-19感染本身,也涉及对抗感染传播的措施,这些变化可能影响了缺勤模式。目的是探讨2019年、2020年和2021年期间SA的发病率和长度是否发生了变化,并确定私营白领中因COVID-19或类似COVID-19诊断导致SA的相关因素。方法:以2018年瑞典所有私营白领为研究对象(n = 1 347 778;在2019年、2020年和2021年期间,使用相关的全国登记数据进行前瞻性随访。我们分别计算了因COVID-19、COVID-19样诊断(在大流行开始时用于疑似COVID-19的某些呼吸道、传染性和基于症状的诊断)和所有其他SA而发生SA的人数和比例,以及因躯体和精神诊断而发生SA的平均天数。使用Logistic回归来确定先前诊断特异性SA、社会人口统计学和工作相关因素与COVID-19或covid -样诊断导致的SA发生率之间的比值比(OR)和95%置信区间。结果:2020年,0.6%的女性和0.3%的男性因COVID-19发生SA。具有covid样诊断的SA相应比例分别为1.2%和0.5%。所有其他SA的比例多年来都很稳定,女性为8.1-8.4%,男性为3.7-3.9%。身体诊断的人均SA日数每年都在增加,但精神诊断的人均SA日数从2019年到2020年减少,在女性和男性中增加到2021年。与COVID-19或covid -样诊断导致的SA事件相关性最强的因素是低收入(与最高收入组相比,调整后的or范围为1.36-5.67)和先前因covid -样诊断导致的SA(与先前没有此类SA的组相比,or范围为4.67-5.31)。结论:私营企业白领因新冠肺炎或类似新冠肺炎的诊断,在14天内发生SA事件的比例较小。与COVID-19导致的SA相关的因素与先前研究中其他诊断导致的SA相关的因素相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
Spatial health inequities among older adults in Thailand: a composite vulnerability index and relationship with local development. Features of the land use and COVID-19 cases and deaths in urban and land counties in Poland throughout the pandemic: a machine learning approach. "Money is everything. If you don't have cash, no one will come to you:" investigating the relationship between socioeconomic status and HIV risk among adolescents and young adults in Kisumu, Kenya. Comprehensive effects and dose-response relationship of screen exposure on university students' physical and mental health and academic performance in the digital age: a systematic review and meta-analysis. COCCOS: a blueprint transition program for young people with chronic conditions using experience-based co-design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1