Pilot feasibility study to determine the utility of direct access and quantitative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the assessment of suspected acute biliary or ductal gallstone presentations.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY BMC Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1186/s12876-025-03637-0
Alex Novak, Anita Acharya, Sally Beer, Alexis Espinosa, Giles Bond Smith, Cyrene Saga, Jane Andrews, Adam Bailey, Zahir Soonawalla, Helen Bungay, Michael Pavlides
{"title":"Pilot feasibility study to determine the utility of direct access and quantitative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the assessment of suspected acute biliary or ductal gallstone presentations.","authors":"Alex Novak, Anita Acharya, Sally Beer, Alexis Espinosa, Giles Bond Smith, Cyrene Saga, Jane Andrews, Adam Bailey, Zahir Soonawalla, Helen Bungay, Michael Pavlides","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03637-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with suspected acute gallstone disease typically undergo abdominal ultrasound. MRCP is often used for patients with abnormal LFTs, potentially making ultrasound unnecessary for this group. Despite high inter-reader variability in MRCP interpretation, new AI technologies may automate and standardize detection and measurement.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients with suspected acute gallstone disease and abnormal liver function tests were randomized into two diagnostic pathways, direct MRCP and standard care. Admission data, healthcare resource use, and clinical outcomes were recorded. National Health Service national 20/21 tariffs were used to calculate and compare healthcare costs. MRCP scans were subsequently analysed using MRCP + software (Perspectum Ltd).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>27 participants were enrolled over 12 months, 15 to direct MRCP and 11 to standard care. One patient was excluded from analysis. Mean patient time to diagnostic report and mean per patient associated direct medical cost and mean cost to diagnosis for the direct MRCP and standard of care group was 2.53 days, £449.54, and £647 respectively for the direct MRCP group and 4.18 days costing £742.06 and £896 for standard care. MRCP + analysis of 11 scans showed significant differences between the groups in terms of gallbladder volume (80.2mm<sup>3</sup> gallstone present versus 30.1mm<sup>3</sup> without, p = 0.018 and cystic duct median width (4.6 mm gallstone present versus 2.7 mm without, p = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Direct MRCP may be a feasible and potentially cost-effective diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected acute gallstone disease and deranged LFTs. Automated measurement of MRCP parameters shows promise in detecting obstruction. Larger trials are warranted to assess this potential.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03709030). Registration date: October 17, 2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"72"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03637-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with suspected acute gallstone disease typically undergo abdominal ultrasound. MRCP is often used for patients with abnormal LFTs, potentially making ultrasound unnecessary for this group. Despite high inter-reader variability in MRCP interpretation, new AI technologies may automate and standardize detection and measurement.

Method: Patients with suspected acute gallstone disease and abnormal liver function tests were randomized into two diagnostic pathways, direct MRCP and standard care. Admission data, healthcare resource use, and clinical outcomes were recorded. National Health Service national 20/21 tariffs were used to calculate and compare healthcare costs. MRCP scans were subsequently analysed using MRCP + software (Perspectum Ltd).

Results: 27 participants were enrolled over 12 months, 15 to direct MRCP and 11 to standard care. One patient was excluded from analysis. Mean patient time to diagnostic report and mean per patient associated direct medical cost and mean cost to diagnosis for the direct MRCP and standard of care group was 2.53 days, £449.54, and £647 respectively for the direct MRCP group and 4.18 days costing £742.06 and £896 for standard care. MRCP + analysis of 11 scans showed significant differences between the groups in terms of gallbladder volume (80.2mm3 gallstone present versus 30.1mm3 without, p = 0.018 and cystic duct median width (4.6 mm gallstone present versus 2.7 mm without, p = 0.042).

Conclusions: Direct MRCP may be a feasible and potentially cost-effective diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected acute gallstone disease and deranged LFTs. Automated measurement of MRCP parameters shows promise in detecting obstruction. Larger trials are warranted to assess this potential.

Clinical trial number: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03709030). Registration date: October 17, 2018.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定直接入路和定量磁共振胆管造影(MRCP)在评估疑似急性胆道或胆管结石表现中的效用的初步可行性研究。
背景:怀疑急性胆结石的患者通常接受腹部超声检查。MRCP通常用于LFTs异常的患者,这可能使该组不需要超声检查。尽管MRCP解释中阅读器间的差异很大,但新的人工智能技术可能会使检测和测量自动化和标准化。方法:将疑似急性胆结石且肝功能检查异常的患者随机分为直接MRCP和标准治疗两种诊断途径。记录入院数据、医疗资源使用和临床结果。使用国民保健服务国家20/21关税来计算和比较医疗保健费用。随后使用MRCP +软件(Perspectum Ltd)分析MRCP扫描。结果:27名参与者在12个月内入组,15名接受直接MRCP治疗,11名接受标准治疗。1例患者被排除在分析之外。直接MRCP组和标准护理组的平均患者到诊断报告的平均时间和平均每位患者相关的直接医疗费用和平均诊断费用分别为2.53天,449.54英镑和647英镑,标准护理组的4.18天,742.06英镑和896英镑。11次扫描的MRCP +分析显示,两组在胆囊体积(存在80.2mm3胆结石vs不存在30.1mm3, p = 0.018)和胆囊管中位宽度(存在4.6 mm胆结石vs不存在2.7 mm胆结石,p = 0.042)方面存在显著差异。结论:直接MRCP可能是一种可行且具有潜在成本效益的诊断策略,用于疑似急性胆结石疾病和肝功能紊乱的患者。MRCP参数的自动测量在检测阻塞方面显示出良好的前景。有必要进行更大规模的试验来评估这种潜力。临床试验号:本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT03709030)。报名日期:2018年10月17日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Fear of disease progression and its associated factors in patients with acute pancreatitis: a cross-sectional study. Translation and cross-sectional validation of the achalasia patient reported outcomes questionnaire in a Dutch cohort. Impact of good glycemic control on survival of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with diabetes mellitus. Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting cancer-specific survival in colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma. The predictive value of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte count in recurrent small intestinal hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1