Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of an Intervention to Support Long-Distance Family Caregivers of Older Adults with Dementia.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Clinical Gerontologist Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1080/07317115.2025.2464869
Verena R Cimarolli, Richard E Chunga, Francesca Falzarano, Catherine Riffin, Nathan Tintle, Sara Czaja, Kathrin Boerner
{"title":"Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of an Intervention to Support Long-Distance Family Caregivers of Older Adults with Dementia.","authors":"Verena R Cimarolli, Richard E Chunga, Francesca Falzarano, Catherine Riffin, Nathan Tintle, Sara Czaja, Kathrin Boerner","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2025.2464869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the implementation feasibility and to establish preliminary efficacy of LDCare - a remotely delivered, manualized, multi-component intervention developed to support long-distance family caregivers (LDCs) of older adults with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study design was a one-arm pre-post-intervention trial involving 40 LDCs - those living at least two hours away from their care recipient - who experienced significant caregiver burden. Feasibility was evaluated in terms of three indicators: recruitment capability, intervention acceptability and suitability. Preliminary efficacy of LDCare for reducing burden, strains, and depression from pre- to immediate post intervention was determined. Feasibility indicators were tracked over time, and participants completed pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LDCs were recruited within the planned timeframe. The acceptability of LDCare was excellent, as demonstrated by high study retention (90%) and overall intervention adherence (95%) rates. The suitability of LDCare for addressing LDCs' needs was rated high. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests revealed statistically significant decreases in caregiver burden, strains, and depression from pre- to immediate post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LDCare demonstrated high feasibility and preliminary efficacy among burdened LDCs.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>LDCare has potential for scalability and eventual integration within service offerings of caregiver support organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2025.2464869","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the implementation feasibility and to establish preliminary efficacy of LDCare - a remotely delivered, manualized, multi-component intervention developed to support long-distance family caregivers (LDCs) of older adults with dementia.

Methods: The study design was a one-arm pre-post-intervention trial involving 40 LDCs - those living at least two hours away from their care recipient - who experienced significant caregiver burden. Feasibility was evaluated in terms of three indicators: recruitment capability, intervention acceptability and suitability. Preliminary efficacy of LDCare for reducing burden, strains, and depression from pre- to immediate post intervention was determined. Feasibility indicators were tracked over time, and participants completed pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention assessments.

Results: LDCs were recruited within the planned timeframe. The acceptability of LDCare was excellent, as demonstrated by high study retention (90%) and overall intervention adherence (95%) rates. The suitability of LDCare for addressing LDCs' needs was rated high. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests revealed statistically significant decreases in caregiver burden, strains, and depression from pre- to immediate post-intervention.

Conclusions: LDCare demonstrated high feasibility and preliminary efficacy among burdened LDCs.

Clinical implications: LDCare has potential for scalability and eventual integration within service offerings of caregiver support organizations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Gerontologist
Clinical Gerontologist GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including: -adjustments to changing roles- issues related to diversity and aging- family caregiving- spirituality- cognitive and psychosocial assessment- depression, anxiety, and PTSD- Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders- long term care- behavioral medicine in aging- rehabilitation and education for older adults. Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.
期刊最新文献
Uncovering Psychosocial Contexts in Goals of Care Conversations: A Qualitative Study in a Multi-Centered Randomized Controlled Trial. "Mental Health Has Been Left Behind": A Qualitative Exploration of stakeholders' Perceptions of Older adults' Mental Well-Being Needs and Services in a Colombian Displaced Community. Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of an Intervention to Support Long-Distance Family Caregivers of Older Adults with Dementia. Relationships Among Caregiver Burden, Psychological Flexibility Processes, and Anxiety in Family Caregivers of People with Dementia. Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Culturally Adapted Dementia Prevention Animation on Ethnically Diverse participants' Knowledge of Dementia Prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1