Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of an Intervention to Support Long-Distance Family Caregivers of Older Adults with Dementia.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Clinical Gerontologist Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1080/07317115.2025.2464869
Verena R Cimarolli, Richard E Chunga, Francesca Falzarano, Catherine Riffin, Nathan Tintle, Sara Czaja, Kathrin Boerner
{"title":"Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of an Intervention to Support Long-Distance Family Caregivers of Older Adults with Dementia.","authors":"Verena R Cimarolli, Richard E Chunga, Francesca Falzarano, Catherine Riffin, Nathan Tintle, Sara Czaja, Kathrin Boerner","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2025.2464869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the implementation feasibility and to establish preliminary efficacy of LDCare - a remotely delivered, manualized, multi-component intervention developed to support long-distance family caregivers (LDCs) of older adults with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study design was a one-arm pre-post-intervention trial involving 40 LDCs - those living at least two hours away from their care recipient - who experienced significant caregiver burden. Feasibility was evaluated in terms of three indicators: recruitment capability, intervention acceptability and suitability. Preliminary efficacy of LDCare for reducing burden, strains, and depression from pre- to immediate post intervention was determined. Feasibility indicators were tracked over time, and participants completed pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LDCs were recruited within the planned timeframe. The acceptability of LDCare was excellent, as demonstrated by high study retention (90%) and overall intervention adherence (95%) rates. The suitability of LDCare for addressing LDCs' needs was rated high. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests revealed statistically significant decreases in caregiver burden, strains, and depression from pre- to immediate post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LDCare demonstrated high feasibility and preliminary efficacy among burdened LDCs.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>LDCare has potential for scalability and eventual integration within service offerings of caregiver support organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"976-986"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2025.2464869","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the implementation feasibility and to establish preliminary efficacy of LDCare - a remotely delivered, manualized, multi-component intervention developed to support long-distance family caregivers (LDCs) of older adults with dementia.

Methods: The study design was a one-arm pre-post-intervention trial involving 40 LDCs - those living at least two hours away from their care recipient - who experienced significant caregiver burden. Feasibility was evaluated in terms of three indicators: recruitment capability, intervention acceptability and suitability. Preliminary efficacy of LDCare for reducing burden, strains, and depression from pre- to immediate post intervention was determined. Feasibility indicators were tracked over time, and participants completed pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention assessments.

Results: LDCs were recruited within the planned timeframe. The acceptability of LDCare was excellent, as demonstrated by high study retention (90%) and overall intervention adherence (95%) rates. The suitability of LDCare for addressing LDCs' needs was rated high. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests revealed statistically significant decreases in caregiver burden, strains, and depression from pre- to immediate post-intervention.

Conclusions: LDCare demonstrated high feasibility and preliminary efficacy among burdened LDCs.

Clinical implications: LDCare has potential for scalability and eventual integration within service offerings of caregiver support organizations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持老年痴呆患者远程家庭照顾者干预的可行性和初步效果。
目的:本试点研究的目的是评估LDCare的实施可行性,并建立LDCare的初步疗效。LDCare是一种远程交付的、手动的、多组分干预措施,旨在支持老年痴呆症患者的远程家庭照顾者(ldc)。方法:研究设计是一项单臂干预前-干预后试验,涉及40个最不发达国家-那些居住在离照顾者至少两小时路程的人-经历了严重的照顾负担。从招募能力、干预可接受性和适宜性三个指标对可行性进行评价。确定LDCare在干预前和干预后立即减轻负担、紧张和抑郁的初步疗效。随着时间的推移跟踪可行性指标,参与者完成干预前和干预后立即评估。结果:在计划的时间框架内招募了最不发达国家。LDCare的可接受性非常好,研究保留率(90%)和总体干预依从性(95%)很高。LDCare解决最不发达国家需求的适宜性评价很高。Wilcoxon sign - rank测试显示,从干预前到干预后立即,照顾者负担、紧张和抑郁在统计学上显著降低。结论:LDCare在负担沉重的最不发达国家中具有较高的可行性和初步疗效。临床意义:LDCare具有可扩展性和最终集成到护理人员支持组织的服务产品中的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Gerontologist
Clinical Gerontologist GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including: -adjustments to changing roles- issues related to diversity and aging- family caregiving- spirituality- cognitive and psychosocial assessment- depression, anxiety, and PTSD- Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders- long term care- behavioral medicine in aging- rehabilitation and education for older adults. Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of Late-Life Hoarding Symptomology Among Rural Adults. Immersive Virtual Reality to Promote Mental Health in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Psychiatric Outpatients Aged 65 and Over: Prevalence, Impulsivity, and Clinical Outcomes. Depression in Older Adults: Do Current DSM Diagnostic Criteria Really Fit? Depression and Anxiety in Long-Term Care Residents During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Influence of Telehealth Availability, Cognitive Status, and Trauma History.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1