Summary of the clinical practice guideline for the management of urinary stones, third edition.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1111/iju.70004
Katsuhito Miyazawa, Satoshi Yamaguchi, Taro Iguchi, Ippei Chikazawa, Takahiro Yasui, Satoru Takahashi, Shiro Hinotsu, Koichiro Akakura, Shizuka Iida, Noritaka Ishito, Takaaki Inoue, Yasuo Kohjimoto, Shinichi Sakamoto, Yoshikazu Sato, Ryoji Takazawa, Tatsuya Takayama, Masao Tsujihata, Yukio Naya, Shuzo Hamamoto, Motoyuki Masai, Takuro Masaki, Junichi Matsuzaki, Soichi Mugiya
{"title":"Summary of the clinical practice guideline for the management of urinary stones, third edition.","authors":"Katsuhito Miyazawa, Satoshi Yamaguchi, Taro Iguchi, Ippei Chikazawa, Takahiro Yasui, Satoru Takahashi, Shiro Hinotsu, Koichiro Akakura, Shizuka Iida, Noritaka Ishito, Takaaki Inoue, Yasuo Kohjimoto, Shinichi Sakamoto, Yoshikazu Sato, Ryoji Takazawa, Tatsuya Takayama, Masao Tsujihata, Yukio Naya, Shuzo Hamamoto, Motoyuki Masai, Takuro Masaki, Junichi Matsuzaki, Soichi Mugiya","doi":"10.1111/iju.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This third edition of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Urinary stones (2023) has been developed under the leadership of the Japanese Urological Association, the Japanese Society of Endourology and Robotics, and the Japanese Society on Urolithiasis Research. This revision adheres to the Minds Manual for Guideline Development (2017) and incorporates new findings from a nationwide survey conducted in 2015, which highlighted the epidemiological characteristics of urolithiasis in Japan since the previous guidelines were published in 2013. A significant advancement in this edition is the systematic review (SR) methodology applied to formulate recommendations for 12 clinical questions (CQs). Both quantitative and qualitative SRs were performed, leading to recommendations determined through consensus among 21 members of the guideline development group. Additionally, nine algorithms were created to support clinical decision-making based on these findings. Topics not addressed by the CQs, considered as foundational knowledge, are outlined in an \"Explanation of Related Matters\" section, which includes 26 items. This article provides an overview of these guidelines. This section ensures that practitioners have access to comprehensive information, covering aspects of urolithiasis management beyond the scope of the systematic reviews. This article provides an overview of the guidelines, emphasizing their relevance and importance in improving the management and treatment outcomes for patients with urinary stones. The guidelines are designed to be a practical resource for clinicians, facilitating evidence-based care in the evolving landscape of urolithiasis treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.70004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This third edition of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Urinary stones (2023) has been developed under the leadership of the Japanese Urological Association, the Japanese Society of Endourology and Robotics, and the Japanese Society on Urolithiasis Research. This revision adheres to the Minds Manual for Guideline Development (2017) and incorporates new findings from a nationwide survey conducted in 2015, which highlighted the epidemiological characteristics of urolithiasis in Japan since the previous guidelines were published in 2013. A significant advancement in this edition is the systematic review (SR) methodology applied to formulate recommendations for 12 clinical questions (CQs). Both quantitative and qualitative SRs were performed, leading to recommendations determined through consensus among 21 members of the guideline development group. Additionally, nine algorithms were created to support clinical decision-making based on these findings. Topics not addressed by the CQs, considered as foundational knowledge, are outlined in an "Explanation of Related Matters" section, which includes 26 items. This article provides an overview of these guidelines. This section ensures that practitioners have access to comprehensive information, covering aspects of urolithiasis management beyond the scope of the systematic reviews. This article provides an overview of the guidelines, emphasizing their relevance and importance in improving the management and treatment outcomes for patients with urinary stones. The guidelines are designed to be a practical resource for clinicians, facilitating evidence-based care in the evolving landscape of urolithiasis treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Urology
International Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
340
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Comment on the Overuse of Imaging in Prostate Cancer Staging. Editorial Comment to "Stone at the same location for 2 months predicts impacted stones and stone-free status after shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones: A Funabashi clinic expert study". Evaluating Risk Factors for Pathological Upstaging in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. This Issue 32-3. Assessment of Feasibility and Outcomes of RUS Surgical Navigation System During Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Small Renal Masses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1