Magnified interaural level differences enhance binaural unmasking in bilateral cochlear implant users.

IF 2.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ACOUSTICS Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1121/10.0034869
Benjamin N Richardson, Jana M Kainerstorfer, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham, Christopher A Brown
{"title":"Magnified interaural level differences enhance binaural unmasking in bilateral cochlear implant users.","authors":"Benjamin N Richardson, Jana M Kainerstorfer, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham, Christopher A Brown","doi":"10.1121/10.0034869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) usage makes binaural benefits a possibility for implant users. Yet for BiCI users, limited access to interaural time difference (ITD) cues and reduced saliency of interaural level difference (ILD) cues restricts perceptual benefits of spatially separating a target from masker sounds. The present study explored whether magnifying ILD cues improves intelligibility of masked speech for BiCI listeners in a \"symmetrical-masker\" configuration, which ensures that neither ear benefits from a long-term positive target-to-masker ratio (TMR) due to naturally occurring ILD cues. ILD magnification estimates moment-to-moment ITDs in octave-wide frequency bands, and applies corresponding ILDs to the target-masker mixtures reaching the two ears at each specific time and frequency band. ILD magnification significantly improved intelligibility in two experiments: one with normal hearing (NH) listeners using vocoded stimuli and one with BiCI users. BiCI listeners showed no benefit of spatial separation between target and maskers with natural ILDs, even for the largest target-masker separation. Because ILD magnification relies on and manipulates only the mixed signals at each ear, the strategy never alters the monaural TMR in either ear at any time. Thus, the observed improvements to masked speech intelligibility come from binaural effects, likely from increased perceptual separation of the competing sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"157 2","pages":"1045-1056"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0034869","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) usage makes binaural benefits a possibility for implant users. Yet for BiCI users, limited access to interaural time difference (ITD) cues and reduced saliency of interaural level difference (ILD) cues restricts perceptual benefits of spatially separating a target from masker sounds. The present study explored whether magnifying ILD cues improves intelligibility of masked speech for BiCI listeners in a "symmetrical-masker" configuration, which ensures that neither ear benefits from a long-term positive target-to-masker ratio (TMR) due to naturally occurring ILD cues. ILD magnification estimates moment-to-moment ITDs in octave-wide frequency bands, and applies corresponding ILDs to the target-masker mixtures reaching the two ears at each specific time and frequency band. ILD magnification significantly improved intelligibility in two experiments: one with normal hearing (NH) listeners using vocoded stimuli and one with BiCI users. BiCI listeners showed no benefit of spatial separation between target and maskers with natural ILDs, even for the largest target-masker separation. Because ILD magnification relies on and manipulates only the mixed signals at each ear, the strategy never alters the monaural TMR in either ear at any time. Thus, the observed improvements to masked speech intelligibility come from binaural effects, likely from increased perceptual separation of the competing sources.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双侧人工耳蜗使用者耳间水平差异放大可增强双耳揭露。
双侧人工耳蜗(BiCI)的使用使得双耳获益成为可能。然而,对于BiCI使用者来说,有限的耳际时间差(ITD)线索和降低的耳际水平差(ILD)线索的显著性限制了将目标声音与掩蔽声音在空间上分离的感知优势。本研究探讨了在“对称-掩蔽”配置下,放大ILD提示是否能提高BiCI听者的掩蔽语音的可理解性,这种配置确保了两只耳朵都没有从自然发生的ILD提示所带来的长期正目标-掩蔽比(TMR)中受益。ILD放大在八度频带内估计瞬时过渡段,并将相应的ILD应用于在每个特定时间和频带到达两耳的目标掩蔽器混合物。在两个实验中,ILD放大显著提高了可听性:一个是正常听力(NH)听众使用声音编码刺激,另一个是BiCI用户。BiCI听者在具有自然ild的目标和掩蔽物之间没有表现出空间分离的好处,即使是最大的目标-掩蔽物分离。由于ILD放大仅依赖和操纵每只耳朵的混合信号,因此该策略在任何时候都不会改变任何一只耳朵的单耳TMR。因此,所观察到的隐藏语音清晰度的改善来自双耳效应,可能来自竞争来源的感知分离增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1433
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Effect of ambisonic order on spatial release from masking [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 156(4), 2169-2176 (2024)]. Is pitch a smooth function of frequency? Evidence from octave adjustments. Multiple ultrasound image generation based on tuned alignment of amplitude hologram over spatially non-uniform ultrasound source. The image model applied to concert halls. Propeller self-noise suppression algorithm for unmanned underwater vehicles based on a two-stage denoising-inpainting framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1