Risk factors for colonization/infection by resistant microorganisms in outbreaks in neonatal unit—a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Jornal de pediatria Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jped.2024.12.005
Roberta Maia de Castro Romanelli , Gabriela Gomes de Souza , Jordana Peruchi Fontis , José Henrique Paiva Rodrigues , João Pedro Ribeiro Viana , Kelvin Oliveira Rocha , Briana Henriques Machado Tarabai , Lêni Márcia Anchieta
{"title":"Risk factors for colonization/infection by resistant microorganisms in outbreaks in neonatal unit—a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Roberta Maia de Castro Romanelli ,&nbsp;Gabriela Gomes de Souza ,&nbsp;Jordana Peruchi Fontis ,&nbsp;José Henrique Paiva Rodrigues ,&nbsp;João Pedro Ribeiro Viana ,&nbsp;Kelvin Oliveira Rocha ,&nbsp;Briana Henriques Machado Tarabai ,&nbsp;Lêni Márcia Anchieta","doi":"10.1016/j.jped.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate risk factors for infection/colonization by resistant bacteria among patients in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review is reported according to PRISMA. The search occurred by consulting the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, SciELO, and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria considered studies with Neonatal population admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (P); Risk factors for resistant bacterial infection (E); No risk factors for resistant bacterial infection (C); Isolation of resistant bacteria in an outbreak (O), Observational studies (S). For Meta-Analysis, data were transformed to a logarithmic scale to directly calculate the standard error from the confidence intervals. The quality of studies was assessed Critical Appraisal Tools recommended by JBI.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 21 articles were eligible and presented a sample size ranging from 10 to 263 newborns (a total of 1979 neonates). Six (28.6 %) studies evaluated infection, five (23.8) evaluated colonization, and 10 (47.6 %) evaluated colonization and infection, covering Gram-positive (<em>n</em> = 8; 38 %) and Gram-negative (<em>n</em> = 13; 62 %) bacteria. In the meta-analysis, the use of venous access (OR: 1.58; 95 %CI 1.14–2.20), mechanical ventilation (OR: 7.55 95 %CI 4.27–13.36), and parenteral nutrition (OR: 4.79; 95 %CI 2.23–10.29) increased the chance of colonization/infection by multiresistant microorganisms. The included studies were considered as having adequate quality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The main risk factors in outbreaks of infection/colonization by resistant microorganisms in Neonatal Units are the use of invasive devices and parenteral nutrition, which leads to the identification of newborns at risk, targeting the development of preventive measures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14867,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de pediatria","volume":"101 3","pages":"Pages 297-311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021755725000166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to evaluate risk factors for infection/colonization by resistant bacteria among patients in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU).

Methods

This systematic review is reported according to PRISMA. The search occurred by consulting the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, SciELO, and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria considered studies with Neonatal population admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (P); Risk factors for resistant bacterial infection (E); No risk factors for resistant bacterial infection (C); Isolation of resistant bacteria in an outbreak (O), Observational studies (S). For Meta-Analysis, data were transformed to a logarithmic scale to directly calculate the standard error from the confidence intervals. The quality of studies was assessed Critical Appraisal Tools recommended by JBI.

Results

A total of 21 articles were eligible and presented a sample size ranging from 10 to 263 newborns (a total of 1979 neonates). Six (28.6 %) studies evaluated infection, five (23.8) evaluated colonization, and 10 (47.6 %) evaluated colonization and infection, covering Gram-positive (n = 8; 38 %) and Gram-negative (n = 13; 62 %) bacteria. In the meta-analysis, the use of venous access (OR: 1.58; 95 %CI 1.14–2.20), mechanical ventilation (OR: 7.55 95 %CI 4.27–13.36), and parenteral nutrition (OR: 4.79; 95 %CI 2.23–10.29) increased the chance of colonization/infection by multiresistant microorganisms. The included studies were considered as having adequate quality.

Conclusion

The main risk factors in outbreaks of infection/colonization by resistant microorganisms in Neonatal Units are the use of invasive devices and parenteral nutrition, which leads to the identification of newborns at risk, targeting the development of preventive measures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿病房爆发耐药微生物定植/感染的危险因素——系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:本研究旨在评估新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)患者耐药菌感染/定植的危险因素。方法:根据PRISMA进行系统综述。通过查阅PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、SciELO和Scopus数据库进行搜索。纳入标准考虑了新生儿重症监护病房(P)新生儿人群的研究;耐药细菌感染的危险因素(E);无耐药细菌感染的危险因素(C);疫情中耐药细菌的分离(O),观察性研究(S)。对于meta分析,数据被转换为对数尺度,以直接计算置信区间的标准误差。采用JBI推荐的关键评估工具对研究质量进行评估。结果:共有21篇文章符合条件,样本量从10到263名新生儿(共1979名新生儿)。6项(28,6 %)研究评估感染,5项(23,8)研究评估定植,10项(47,6 %)研究评估定植和感染,包括革兰氏阳性(n = 8;38 %)和革兰氏阴性(n = 13;62年 %)的细菌。在meta分析中,静脉通路的使用(OR: 1,58;95 %CI 1,14-2,20)、机械通气(OR: 7,55 95 %CI 4,27-13,36)和肠外营养(OR: 4,79;95 %CI 2,23-10,29)增加了多耐药微生物定植/感染的机会。纳入的研究被认为具有足够的质量。结论:新生儿病房耐药微生物感染/定植暴发的主要危险因素是侵入性装置的使用和肠外营养的使用,这导致了对高危新生儿的识别,并有针对性地制定预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jornal de pediatria
Jornal de pediatria 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Jornal de Pediatria is a bimonthly publication of the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics (Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria, SBP). It has been published without interruption since 1934. Jornal de Pediatria publishes original articles and review articles covering various areas in the field of pediatrics. By publishing relevant scientific contributions, Jornal de Pediatria aims at improving the standards of pediatrics and of the healthcare provided for children and adolescents in general, as well to foster debate about health.
期刊最新文献
Biliary Atresia: advances and challenges in early diagnosis and management. Clinical utility of echocardiography in bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a retrospective cohort study. Letter to the editor regarding "Development of a machine learning-based predictive model for long-term adverse outcomes in neonatal bacterial meningitis". Shorter epinephrine dosing intervals and one-year survival after in-hospital pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The impact of adenoid hypertrophy across pediatric age groups on maxillomandibular development and position.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1