If We Build It, Why They Do Not Come? An American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Collaborative to Understand Barriers to Completion of Cancer Treatment.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1200/OP-24-00745
Lauren M Janczewski, Anthony D Yang, Eileen Reilly, Kelley Chan, Tashae Coates, Shayla Scarlett, Susan Hedlund, Rebecca A Snyder, Bruce Haffty, Charles Shelton, Laurie J Kirstein
{"title":"If We Build It, Why They Do Not Come? An American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Collaborative to Understand Barriers to Completion of Cancer Treatment.","authors":"Lauren M Janczewski, Anthony D Yang, Eileen Reilly, Kelley Chan, Tashae Coates, Shayla Scarlett, Susan Hedlund, Rebecca A Snyder, Bruce Haffty, Charles Shelton, Laurie J Kirstein","doi":"10.1200/OP-24-00745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many patients face barriers to cancer care, leading to disparities in cancer-specific outcomes. Specifically, missing multiple radiation treatments can be associated with increased locoregional recurrence. We sought to assess the frequency and reasons for missed radiotherapy among accredited cancer programs participating in a national quality improvement (QI) collaborative addressing barriers to care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Breaking Barriers National QI Collaborative conducted through the American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs enrolled 342 accredited cancer programs, prospectively recording patients scheduled for a 15-45-day course of radiotherapy over five separate, 60-day data collection periods (March-December 2023). Programs identified those who missed ≥three treatments, referred to as at risk of worse outcomes, and queried reasons for missed radiotherapy. Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed differences in rates of missed treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 332 programs (97.1%) identified at-risk patients, totaling 5,221 patients who missed ≥three treatments. The median percentage of at-risk patients per program was 9.4% (IQR, 4.5-16.5). Programs located in the Northeast (median, 11.3% [IQR, 5.4-17.3]) had the highest proportion of at-risk patients (<i>P</i> = .014). Patients with rectal (13.0%) and gynecologic (11.4%) cancers were most frequently at risk (<i>P</i> < .001). Overall, 91.0% of hospitals reported missed radiation treatments due to illness unrelated to treatment, 71.7% due to transportation, 54.2% due to conflicting appointments, and 53.0% due to no longer wishing to pursue treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Barriers to completing radiotherapy are prevalent among accredited cancer programs nationwide. Future work developing interventions in response to identified barriers in this national QI collaborative may be scalable to other areas of cancer care to improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2400745"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00745","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Many patients face barriers to cancer care, leading to disparities in cancer-specific outcomes. Specifically, missing multiple radiation treatments can be associated with increased locoregional recurrence. We sought to assess the frequency and reasons for missed radiotherapy among accredited cancer programs participating in a national quality improvement (QI) collaborative addressing barriers to care.

Methods: The Breaking Barriers National QI Collaborative conducted through the American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs enrolled 342 accredited cancer programs, prospectively recording patients scheduled for a 15-45-day course of radiotherapy over five separate, 60-day data collection periods (March-December 2023). Programs identified those who missed ≥three treatments, referred to as at risk of worse outcomes, and queried reasons for missed radiotherapy. Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed differences in rates of missed treatments.

Results: In total, 332 programs (97.1%) identified at-risk patients, totaling 5,221 patients who missed ≥three treatments. The median percentage of at-risk patients per program was 9.4% (IQR, 4.5-16.5). Programs located in the Northeast (median, 11.3% [IQR, 5.4-17.3]) had the highest proportion of at-risk patients (P = .014). Patients with rectal (13.0%) and gynecologic (11.4%) cancers were most frequently at risk (P < .001). Overall, 91.0% of hospitals reported missed radiation treatments due to illness unrelated to treatment, 71.7% due to transportation, 54.2% due to conflicting appointments, and 53.0% due to no longer wishing to pursue treatment.

Conclusion: Barriers to completing radiotherapy are prevalent among accredited cancer programs nationwide. Future work developing interventions in response to identified barriers in this national QI collaborative may be scalable to other areas of cancer care to improve outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
期刊最新文献
Real-World Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Implementation: Challenges and Successes of a Pan-Canadian Initiative to Improve the Future of Patient-Centered Cancer Care. Inpatient Immunotherapy Outcomes Study: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis. Facility-Level Disparities in Radiation Use for Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer. Virtual Second-Opinion Delivery for Oncology Patients. If We Build It, Why They Do Not Come? An American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Collaborative to Understand Barriers to Completion of Cancer Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1