Clinical Implications of the C-Reactive Protein-Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Marker in Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0471
Koji Amano, Satomi Okamura, Tomofumi Miura, Vickie E Baracos, Naoharu Mori, Tatsuma Sakaguchi, Yu Uneno, Hiroto Ishiki, Yusuke Hiratsuka, Naosuke Yokomichi, Jun Hamano, Mika Baba, Masanori Mori, Tatsuya Morita
{"title":"Clinical Implications of the C-Reactive Protein-Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Marker in Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer.","authors":"Koji Amano, Satomi Okamura, Tomofumi Miura, Vickie E Baracos, Naoharu Mori, Tatsuma Sakaguchi, Yu Uneno, Hiroto Ishiki, Yusuke Hiratsuka, Naosuke Yokomichi, Jun Hamano, Mika Baba, Masanori Mori, Tatsuya Morita","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Few studies investigated the clinical implications of C-reactive protein-albumin ratio (CAR) in palliative care. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To determine the association of CAR with overall survival among terminally ill patients with cance. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Datasets were obtained through two multicenter prospective cohort studies. <b><i>Setting/Subjects:</i></b> Patients newly referred to palliative care. <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> Physicians recorded measures at the baseline. Patients were followed up to their death or observed for 6 months. The patients in cohort 2 were divided using the CAR cutoffs detected using a piecewise linear hazards model in cohort 1. We performed time-to-event analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for patients in cohort 2. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 1554 patients in cohort 1 and 1517 patients in cohort 2 were eligible. The cutoffs were 0.1, 1.2, and 6.4. The patients in cohort 2 were divided into four categories (<0.1 [<i>n</i> = 103], 0.1-1.2 [<i>n</i> = 433], 1.2-6.4 [712], and ≥6.4 [<i>n</i> = 269]). The adjusted <i>p</i> values of the log-rank tests were <0.001. Significantly higher risks of mortality were observed in the Cox proportional hazard model for the higher categories than in the lowest category (CAR 0.1-1.2: adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.89; CAR 1.2-6.4: adjusted HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.65-2.62; CAR ≥6.4: adjusted HR 2.94, 95% CI 2.29-3.79). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Patients with a higher CAR had significantly higher risks of mortality than those with a lower CAR.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0471","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few studies investigated the clinical implications of C-reactive protein-albumin ratio (CAR) in palliative care. Objectives: To determine the association of CAR with overall survival among terminally ill patients with cance. Design: Datasets were obtained through two multicenter prospective cohort studies. Setting/Subjects: Patients newly referred to palliative care. Measurements: Physicians recorded measures at the baseline. Patients were followed up to their death or observed for 6 months. The patients in cohort 2 were divided using the CAR cutoffs detected using a piecewise linear hazards model in cohort 1. We performed time-to-event analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for patients in cohort 2. Results: A total of 1554 patients in cohort 1 and 1517 patients in cohort 2 were eligible. The cutoffs were 0.1, 1.2, and 6.4. The patients in cohort 2 were divided into four categories (<0.1 [n = 103], 0.1-1.2 [n = 433], 1.2-6.4 [712], and ≥6.4 [n = 269]). The adjusted p values of the log-rank tests were <0.001. Significantly higher risks of mortality were observed in the Cox proportional hazard model for the higher categories than in the lowest category (CAR 0.1-1.2: adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.89; CAR 1.2-6.4: adjusted HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.65-2.62; CAR ≥6.4: adjusted HR 2.94, 95% CI 2.29-3.79). Conclusions: Patients with a higher CAR had significantly higher risks of mortality than those with a lower CAR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
期刊最新文献
"Telehealth Allows for Flexibility and More Equity": Provider Perspectives on Telehealth for Outpatient Palliative Care for Underserved Patients. Grief and Bereavement in Pediatric Palliative Care #502. A Systematic Review of Grief Experiences of Children Who Have Lost a Sibling. Pancreatic Enzyme Supplementation for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer #500. Letter to the Editor: Error in Estimating Prevalence of Iatrogenic Opioid Use Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1