Rehabilitation Strategies and Occlusal Vertical Dimension Considerations in the Management of Worn Dentitions: Consensus Statement From SSRD, SEPES, and PROSEC Conference on Minimally Invasive Restorations

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1111/jerd.13432
Alexis Ioannidis, João Pitta, Rubén Agustín Panadero, Jennifer G. M. Chantler, Sandra Fernández Villar, Manrique Fonseca, Jaime Gil Lozano, Christoph H. F. Hämmerle, Jeremias Hey, Duygu Karasan, Iris Kraljevic, Amélie Mainjot, Aspasia Pachiou, Patrick Rutten, Manja von Stein-Lausnitz, Malin Strasding, Lucia K. Zaugg
{"title":"Rehabilitation Strategies and Occlusal Vertical Dimension Considerations in the Management of Worn Dentitions: Consensus Statement From SSRD, SEPES, and PROSEC Conference on Minimally Invasive Restorations","authors":"Alexis Ioannidis,&nbsp;João Pitta,&nbsp;Rubén Agustín Panadero,&nbsp;Jennifer G. M. Chantler,&nbsp;Sandra Fernández Villar,&nbsp;Manrique Fonseca,&nbsp;Jaime Gil Lozano,&nbsp;Christoph H. F. Hämmerle,&nbsp;Jeremias Hey,&nbsp;Duygu Karasan,&nbsp;Iris Kraljevic,&nbsp;Amélie Mainjot,&nbsp;Aspasia Pachiou,&nbsp;Patrick Rutten,&nbsp;Manja von Stein-Lausnitz,&nbsp;Malin Strasding,&nbsp;Lucia K. Zaugg","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The Joint SSRD, SEPES, and PROSEC Consensus Conference aimed to provide clinical statements and recommendations for the rehabilitation of worn dentition and to evaluate the necessity of an evaluation phase when increasing the occlusal vertical dimension (OVD) during full-mouth rehabilitation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two systematic reviews were conducted before the conference. The findings of the reviews were analyzed, discussed in working group 2, and debated in plenary sessions until a consensus was reached. Consensus statements were formulated based on available evidence and expert opinion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Both direct and indirect minimally invasive approaches, utilizing materials such as composite resins and lithium disilicate ceramics, were deemed viable for managing worn dentitions. The choice of approach and material should depend on the extent of tooth substance loss and the treatment goals. Evidence on the necessity of an evaluation phase was inconclusive. However, an evaluation phase can aid in managing patient expectations, refining treatment sequencing, and supporting less experienced clinicians. Emphasis was placed on non-invasive and minimally invasive techniques, adequate diagnostics, and the potential benefits of fixed interim restorations when evaluating increased OVD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The consensus statements provide a framework for managing worn dentitions and decisions regarding OVD increases, emphasizing minimally invasive approaches and individualized treatment planning. However, gaps in evidence remain, particularly regarding the long-term effectiveness of materials and the evaluation phase. Future research is required to address these uncertainties, focusing on long-term outcomes, material comparisons, and patient-reported outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":"37 3","pages":"702-706"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jerd.13432","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The Joint SSRD, SEPES, and PROSEC Consensus Conference aimed to provide clinical statements and recommendations for the rehabilitation of worn dentition and to evaluate the necessity of an evaluation phase when increasing the occlusal vertical dimension (OVD) during full-mouth rehabilitation.

Materials and Methods

Two systematic reviews were conducted before the conference. The findings of the reviews were analyzed, discussed in working group 2, and debated in plenary sessions until a consensus was reached. Consensus statements were formulated based on available evidence and expert opinion.

Results

Both direct and indirect minimally invasive approaches, utilizing materials such as composite resins and lithium disilicate ceramics, were deemed viable for managing worn dentitions. The choice of approach and material should depend on the extent of tooth substance loss and the treatment goals. Evidence on the necessity of an evaluation phase was inconclusive. However, an evaluation phase can aid in managing patient expectations, refining treatment sequencing, and supporting less experienced clinicians. Emphasis was placed on non-invasive and minimally invasive techniques, adequate diagnostics, and the potential benefits of fixed interim restorations when evaluating increased OVD.

Conclusions

The consensus statements provide a framework for managing worn dentitions and decisions regarding OVD increases, emphasizing minimally invasive approaches and individualized treatment planning. However, gaps in evidence remain, particularly regarding the long-term effectiveness of materials and the evaluation phase. Future research is required to address these uncertainties, focusing on long-term outcomes, material comparisons, and patient-reported outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙列磨损处理中的康复策略和咬合垂直尺寸考虑:来自SSRD, SEPES和PROSEC微创修复会议的共识声明。
目的:联合SSRD, SEPES和PROSEC共识会议旨在为磨损牙列的康复提供临床陈述和建议,并评估在全口康复期间增加咬合垂直尺寸(OVD)时评估阶段的必要性。材料与方法:会前进行了两次系统综述。审查的结果在第二工作组进行了分析和讨论,并在全体会议上进行了辩论,直到达成协商一致意见。共识声明是根据现有证据和专家意见制定的。结果:使用复合树脂和二硅酸锂陶瓷等材料的直接和间接微创方法被认为是治疗牙列磨损的可行方法。方法和材料的选择应取决于牙齿物质流失的程度和治疗目标。关于评价阶段的必要性的证据尚无定论。然而,评估阶段可以帮助管理患者的期望,完善治疗顺序,并支持经验不足的临床医生。在评估增加的OVD时,重点放在非侵入性和微创技术、充分的诊断和固定临时修复的潜在益处上。结论:共识声明提供了处理磨损牙列和决定OVD增加的框架,强调微创方法和个性化治疗计划。但是,证据方面仍然存在差距,特别是在材料的长期有效性和评价阶段方面。未来的研究需要解决这些不确定性,关注长期结果、材料比较和患者报告的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
期刊最新文献
Color and Translucency Stability of Additively Manufactured Interim Dental Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Aging Simulation Study. Effects of Bleaching Protocols on the Esthetic Outcome and Surface Integrity of Enamel Treated With an Ammonia-Free Silver Fluoride Solution. Eight-Year Clinical Performance of Cantilevered Zirconia Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effect of Nanostructured Alumina Coating. AI-Powered Intraoperative Navigation Photogrammetry for Complete-Arch Implant Impression and Immediate Loading With a 3D-Printed Temporary Prosthesis: A Prospective Clinical Study. Effect of Injection Guide Design on the Accuracy of Direct Composite Veneers: An In Vitro Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1