How Long Can an Intragastric Balloon Remain in the Stomach Safely? A Rare Case Report on 5.5 Years of Asymptomatic Retention.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1007/s11695-025-07744-5
Mehmet Gencturk, Muhammed Said Dalkılıç, Hasan Erdem, Abdullah Sisik
{"title":"How Long Can an Intragastric Balloon Remain in the Stomach Safely? A Rare Case Report on 5.5 Years of Asymptomatic Retention.","authors":"Mehmet Gencturk, Muhammed Said Dalkılıç, Hasan Erdem, Abdullah Sisik","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07744-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intragastric balloons (IGBs) are widely used as a minimally invasive weight loss intervention for patients with obesity. While the recommended implantation period for most IGBs is 6 to 12 months, exceeding this duration is associated with an increased risk of complications such as deflation, migration, obstruction, and gastric perforation. However, the long-term safety of retained IGBs remains inadequately studied. We report a rare case of an asymptomatic 5.5-year retention of a Spatz3 IGB in a 29-year-old male patient. Initially implanted for obesity management with a body mass index (BMI) of 38 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, the patient experienced an initial 15 kg weight loss, followed by partial weight regain. Despite multiple attempts to schedule removal, the patient postponed the procedure due to personal reasons and was lost to follow-up. Upon returning 5.5 years later, he remained asymptomatic with a BMI of 37.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Endoscopic examination revealed an intact gastric mucosa and a fully inflated balloon without evidence of degradation or leakage. The balloon was successfully removed endoscopically under sedation, and the postoperative course was uneventful. This case highlights that, under certain conditions, IGBs may remain intact beyond their recommended duration without causing immediate complications. However, this should not be interpreted as evidence of safety, as prolonged retention poses significant risks. Regular patient education, adherence to follow-up schedules, and improved tracking systems are crucial to prevent unintended long-term IGB retention and its associated complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07744-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intragastric balloons (IGBs) are widely used as a minimally invasive weight loss intervention for patients with obesity. While the recommended implantation period for most IGBs is 6 to 12 months, exceeding this duration is associated with an increased risk of complications such as deflation, migration, obstruction, and gastric perforation. However, the long-term safety of retained IGBs remains inadequately studied. We report a rare case of an asymptomatic 5.5-year retention of a Spatz3 IGB in a 29-year-old male patient. Initially implanted for obesity management with a body mass index (BMI) of 38 kg/m2, the patient experienced an initial 15 kg weight loss, followed by partial weight regain. Despite multiple attempts to schedule removal, the patient postponed the procedure due to personal reasons and was lost to follow-up. Upon returning 5.5 years later, he remained asymptomatic with a BMI of 37.3 kg/m2. Endoscopic examination revealed an intact gastric mucosa and a fully inflated balloon without evidence of degradation or leakage. The balloon was successfully removed endoscopically under sedation, and the postoperative course was uneventful. This case highlights that, under certain conditions, IGBs may remain intact beyond their recommended duration without causing immediate complications. However, this should not be interpreted as evidence of safety, as prolonged retention poses significant risks. Regular patient education, adherence to follow-up schedules, and improved tracking systems are crucial to prevent unintended long-term IGB retention and its associated complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Changes in the Structure, Function, and Fat Content of the Heart in Patients with Obesity After Bariatric Surgery-A Prospective Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. The Association between Bariatric Surgery Outcomes and Socioeconomic Deprivation. Remote Patient Monitoring Following Same-Day Discharge Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Beyond Insulin: Modified OAGB in Low-BMI Insulin-Resistant and Non-compliant Type 2 Diabetic Patients. GLP-1: The Progenitor Hormone.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1