How Long Can an Intragastric Balloon Remain in the Stomach Safely? A Rare Case Report on 5.5 Years of Asymptomatic Retention.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1007/s11695-025-07744-5
Mehmet Gencturk, Muhammed Said Dalkılıç, Hasan Erdem, Abdullah Sisik
{"title":"How Long Can an Intragastric Balloon Remain in the Stomach Safely? A Rare Case Report on 5.5 Years of Asymptomatic Retention.","authors":"Mehmet Gencturk, Muhammed Said Dalkılıç, Hasan Erdem, Abdullah Sisik","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07744-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intragastric balloons (IGBs) are widely used as a minimally invasive weight loss intervention for patients with obesity. While the recommended implantation period for most IGBs is 6 to 12 months, exceeding this duration is associated with an increased risk of complications such as deflation, migration, obstruction, and gastric perforation. However, the long-term safety of retained IGBs remains inadequately studied. We report a rare case of an asymptomatic 5.5-year retention of a Spatz3 IGB in a 29-year-old male patient. Initially implanted for obesity management with a body mass index (BMI) of 38 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, the patient experienced an initial 15 kg weight loss, followed by partial weight regain. Despite multiple attempts to schedule removal, the patient postponed the procedure due to personal reasons and was lost to follow-up. Upon returning 5.5 years later, he remained asymptomatic with a BMI of 37.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Endoscopic examination revealed an intact gastric mucosa and a fully inflated balloon without evidence of degradation or leakage. The balloon was successfully removed endoscopically under sedation, and the postoperative course was uneventful. This case highlights that, under certain conditions, IGBs may remain intact beyond their recommended duration without causing immediate complications. However, this should not be interpreted as evidence of safety, as prolonged retention poses significant risks. Regular patient education, adherence to follow-up schedules, and improved tracking systems are crucial to prevent unintended long-term IGB retention and its associated complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1190-1192"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07744-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intragastric balloons (IGBs) are widely used as a minimally invasive weight loss intervention for patients with obesity. While the recommended implantation period for most IGBs is 6 to 12 months, exceeding this duration is associated with an increased risk of complications such as deflation, migration, obstruction, and gastric perforation. However, the long-term safety of retained IGBs remains inadequately studied. We report a rare case of an asymptomatic 5.5-year retention of a Spatz3 IGB in a 29-year-old male patient. Initially implanted for obesity management with a body mass index (BMI) of 38 kg/m2, the patient experienced an initial 15 kg weight loss, followed by partial weight regain. Despite multiple attempts to schedule removal, the patient postponed the procedure due to personal reasons and was lost to follow-up. Upon returning 5.5 years later, he remained asymptomatic with a BMI of 37.3 kg/m2. Endoscopic examination revealed an intact gastric mucosa and a fully inflated balloon without evidence of degradation or leakage. The balloon was successfully removed endoscopically under sedation, and the postoperative course was uneventful. This case highlights that, under certain conditions, IGBs may remain intact beyond their recommended duration without causing immediate complications. However, this should not be interpreted as evidence of safety, as prolonged retention poses significant risks. Regular patient education, adherence to follow-up schedules, and improved tracking systems are crucial to prevent unintended long-term IGB retention and its associated complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃内气囊在胃内安全停留多久?一例罕见的5.5年无症状潴留病例报告。
胃内气囊(IGBs)被广泛用于肥胖患者的微创减肥干预。虽然大多数igb的推荐植入时间为6至12个月,但超过这个时间会增加并发症的风险,如通货紧缩、迁移、梗阻和胃穿孔。然而,保留igb的长期安全性仍未得到充分研究。我们报告一例罕见的29岁男性患者无症状的5年半的Spatz3 IGB潴留。该患者最初是为了控制体重指数(BMI)为38 kg/m2的肥胖而植入的,最初体重减轻了15 kg,随后体重部分恢复。尽管多次尝试切除,但由于个人原因,患者推迟了手术,失去了随访机会。5.5年后返回时,患者仍无症状,BMI为37.3 kg/m2。内窥镜检查显示完整的胃粘膜和一个完全充气的球囊,没有退化或渗漏的证据。在镇静状态下,经内镜成功取出气囊,术后过程顺利。该病例强调,在某些情况下,igb可能在推荐的持续时间后保持完整,而不会立即引起并发症。然而,这不应该被解释为安全性的证据,因为长时间的滞留会带来重大风险。定期对患者进行教育、遵守随访计划和改进跟踪系统对于防止意外的长期IGB潴留及其相关并发症至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
Post-operative Metabolic Adaptation and its Influence on Long-Term Recurrent Weight Gain After Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome Following Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review. Correction to: Sex Differences in the Impact of Preoperative Psychological Factors on Weight Loss Following Sleeve Gastrectomy. Loop versus Roux-en-Y Duodenojejunal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy for Type 2 Diabetes: Three-Year Outcomes of a Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial. Energy and Micronutrient Intake One Year After Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Substudy of the Bypass Equipoise Sleeve Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1