Assessing Eligibility for Apomorphine Therapy in Parkinson's Disease: The Telemonitoring Potential.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Movement Disorders Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1002/mdc3.14345
Alagaratnam Niruban, Vaclav Dostal, Abigail Mutimer, Konstantinos Tsamis, Spyridon Kontaxis, Nicholas Kostikis, Foivos Kanellos, Adamantios Ntanis, George Rigas, Spyridon Konitsiotis
{"title":"Assessing Eligibility for Apomorphine Therapy in Parkinson's Disease: The Telemonitoring Potential.","authors":"Alagaratnam Niruban, Vaclav Dostal, Abigail Mutimer, Konstantinos Tsamis, Spyridon Kontaxis, Nicholas Kostikis, Foivos Kanellos, Adamantios Ntanis, George Rigas, Spyridon Konitsiotis","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.14345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although there are established guidelines for the selection of suitable candidates, objective and timely referral for the use of apomorphine remains challenging.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This research examined how telemonitoring may facilitate referrals for continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion in Parkinson's disease (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Blind Rater and a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) including an expert PD nurse, neurologist, and geriatrician determined apomorphine pump treatment eligibility for 20 patients with PD. The MDT considered telemonitoring data and physical examination to determine eligibility. The Blind Rater used only telemonitoring data (PDMonitor®) to evaluate eligibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show that using wearable sensors to determine appropriateness of apomorphine pump treatment is similar to a complete method that combines objective motor symptom monitoring with clinical evaluation. The MDT and blind rater had a 0.89 Cohen's kappa coefficient, which suggests high rate of agreement. The best-performing objective metric for differentiating patients who were recommended (APO) from those non-recommended (non-APO) for apomorphine pump therapy, was the device-reported percentage of time in the \"ON\" state, which takes into consideration the \"OFF\" and dyskinesia time. The APO group had lower values in this metric and could be differentiated from the non-APO group accurately (85%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using telemonitoring to determine eligibility for apomorphine therapy might improve evaluation and treatment in patients with PD and, therefore help improve their quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although there are established guidelines for the selection of suitable candidates, objective and timely referral for the use of apomorphine remains challenging.

Objectives: This research examined how telemonitoring may facilitate referrals for continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion in Parkinson's disease (PD).

Methods: A Blind Rater and a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) including an expert PD nurse, neurologist, and geriatrician determined apomorphine pump treatment eligibility for 20 patients with PD. The MDT considered telemonitoring data and physical examination to determine eligibility. The Blind Rater used only telemonitoring data (PDMonitor®) to evaluate eligibility.

Results: The results show that using wearable sensors to determine appropriateness of apomorphine pump treatment is similar to a complete method that combines objective motor symptom monitoring with clinical evaluation. The MDT and blind rater had a 0.89 Cohen's kappa coefficient, which suggests high rate of agreement. The best-performing objective metric for differentiating patients who were recommended (APO) from those non-recommended (non-APO) for apomorphine pump therapy, was the device-reported percentage of time in the "ON" state, which takes into consideration the "OFF" and dyskinesia time. The APO group had lower values in this metric and could be differentiated from the non-APO group accurately (85%).

Conclusions: Using telemonitoring to determine eligibility for apomorphine therapy might improve evaluation and treatment in patients with PD and, therefore help improve their quality of life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
期刊最新文献
Representational Disparities in the Enrollment of Parkinson's Disease Clinical Trials. Decision-making trends in therapeutic interventions for multiple system atrophy: a 24-year retrospective study. In Memoriam C. Warren Olanow (1941-2024). Autoimmune "Atypical" Atypical Parkinsonism: Anti-GABAB Receptor Encephalitis Presenting as a Reversible Mimic of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy. Equal Distress and Less Hope in Parkinson's Disease Patients Compared to Brain Tumors Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1