Opportunistic Screening for Local Osteoporosis of the Proximal Humerus on the Basis of Hounsfield Units: A Study of Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears.

IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1111/os.14364
Guihu Liu, Xiaolong Wang, Xieyu Wang, Yaxuan Zhang, Yinguang Ma, Haibin Zhou, Guangsi Shen
{"title":"Opportunistic Screening for Local Osteoporosis of the Proximal Humerus on the Basis of Hounsfield Units: A Study of Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears.","authors":"Guihu Liu, Xiaolong Wang, Xieyu Wang, Yaxuan Zhang, Yinguang Ma, Haibin Zhou, Guangsi Shen","doi":"10.1111/os.14364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The accuracy of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in predicting proximal humerus osteoporosis in patients with rotator cuff tears (RCTs) undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation of computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield units (HU) and the deltoid tuberosity index (DTI) with bone mineral density (BMD), and to evaluate the predictive value of HU values for implant selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed the preoperative shoulder CT scans and x-rays of 184 patients who underwent ARCR. Preoperative CT scans were utilized to assess the multiple anatomical parts of the proximal humerus to ascertain the HU values, whereas preoperative x-rays were analyzed to derive the DTI. Among them, 104 patients with preoperative DXA data were grouped according to the WHO diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis to establish the threshold HU values. The correlation between HU values and DTI and the lowest T score on DXA was studied, and the relationship between the HU value and the type of implant selected was discussed. The Pearson correlation coefficient was employed to examine the relationship between HU values, DTI, and T scores. And the Spearman correlation coefficient was employed to examine the relationship between HU values and enhanced fixation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant correlation between the HU values and DTI and the lowest T score (r<sub>HU&T score</sub> = 0.539-0.576, r<sub>DTI&T score</sub> = 0.288, p < 0.05). On the basis of the lowest T score grouping, the threshold HU values for diagnosing proximal humeral osteoporosis were obtained: proximal humerus = 47.44, humeral head = 97.62, greater tuberosity = 10.9, and lesser tuberosity = 5.38. There was no correlation between HU values and enhanced fixation (using 5.5-mm anchors or metal anchors instead of 4.5-mm anchors or all-suture anchors) (r = -0.143 to -0.027, p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Proximal humeral HU values were significantly correlated with DTI and the lowest T score on DXA. When the HU values in the proximal humerus in patients with RCTs fall below the thresholds, the surgery should be carefully planned. No correlation exists between HU values and enhanced fixation, thus further investigation through group studies is warranted.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, study of nonconsecutive patients, diagnostic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14364","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The accuracy of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in predicting proximal humerus osteoporosis in patients with rotator cuff tears (RCTs) undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation of computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield units (HU) and the deltoid tuberosity index (DTI) with bone mineral density (BMD), and to evaluate the predictive value of HU values for implant selection.

Methods: This study analyzed the preoperative shoulder CT scans and x-rays of 184 patients who underwent ARCR. Preoperative CT scans were utilized to assess the multiple anatomical parts of the proximal humerus to ascertain the HU values, whereas preoperative x-rays were analyzed to derive the DTI. Among them, 104 patients with preoperative DXA data were grouped according to the WHO diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis to establish the threshold HU values. The correlation between HU values and DTI and the lowest T score on DXA was studied, and the relationship between the HU value and the type of implant selected was discussed. The Pearson correlation coefficient was employed to examine the relationship between HU values, DTI, and T scores. And the Spearman correlation coefficient was employed to examine the relationship between HU values and enhanced fixation.

Results: There was a significant correlation between the HU values and DTI and the lowest T score (rHU&T score = 0.539-0.576, rDTI&T score = 0.288, p < 0.05). On the basis of the lowest T score grouping, the threshold HU values for diagnosing proximal humeral osteoporosis were obtained: proximal humerus = 47.44, humeral head = 97.62, greater tuberosity = 10.9, and lesser tuberosity = 5.38. There was no correlation between HU values and enhanced fixation (using 5.5-mm anchors or metal anchors instead of 4.5-mm anchors or all-suture anchors) (r = -0.143 to -0.027, p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Proximal humeral HU values were significantly correlated with DTI and the lowest T score on DXA. When the HU values in the proximal humerus in patients with RCTs fall below the thresholds, the surgery should be carefully planned. No correlation exists between HU values and enhanced fixation, thus further investigation through group studies is warranted.

Level of evidence: Level III, study of nonconsecutive patients, diagnostic study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
期刊最新文献
Targeting the Infrapatellar Branch of the Saphenous Nerve for Pain Relief in Patients With Acute or Chronic Knee Pain: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies. Opportunistic Screening for Local Osteoporosis of the Proximal Humerus on the Basis of Hounsfield Units: A Study of Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears. Diagnostic Efficiency of MRI in Child and Adolescent Lateral Discoid Meniscus. Robot-Assisted Screw Fixation Combined With Endoscopic Bone Graft in the Minimally Invasive Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolysis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Comparison of the Outcomes of Endoscopic Posterolateral Interbody Fusion and Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1