Gastrointestinal parasitic worm burdens and efficacy of deworming practices in growing beef cattle grazing California pastures.

IF 1.8 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2025-01-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txaf007
Gabriele U Maier, Phillip Torcal, Jeffery Stackhouse, Josh S Davy, Larry C Forero, Laura Snell, Grace Woodmansee
{"title":"Gastrointestinal parasitic worm burdens and efficacy of deworming practices in growing beef cattle grazing California pastures.","authors":"Gabriele U Maier, Phillip Torcal, Jeffery Stackhouse, Josh S Davy, Larry C Forero, Laura Snell, Grace Woodmansee","doi":"10.1093/tas/txaf007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment for enteric parasites is a common practice in beef cattle, yet little data is known about the prevalence of nematode and trematode parasite infections in beef cattle in the western United States. Likewise, the data on the efficacy of deworming practices and the presence of anthelmintic resistance (AR) of these parasites in this region is sparse. The current study collected evidence for the presence of nematode and trematode parasites in 18 herds of young beef cattle grazing either dryland or irrigated pasture in northern California as well as on efficacy and evidence of AR in a subgroup of herds. We found variable levels of fecal egg counts (FEC) ranging from 6 to 322 for the arithmetic mean eggs per gram (EPG) in the tested cattle groups. There was no difference in the number of EPG between herds grazing dryland or irrigated pasture (<i>P</i> = 0.54). We did not find any evidence for liver flukes or lungworms in the tested cattle. There was evidence of AR to macrocyclic lactones in all eight herds where fecal egg count reduction tests (FECRT) were performed, however due to types and execution of treatment applications and sample sizes, these results need to be interpreted with caution. The most common genus of third stage larvae in coproculture testing before treatment was <i>Cooperia</i> (between 55% and 98% of larvae) as well as post treatment for those herds undergoing FECRT (between 50% and 96%). <i>Ostertagia</i> was the second most frequent genus of larvae found in coproculture testing making up between 0% and 27% of larvae before treatment and between 5% and 50% of larvae after treatment. Anthelmintic practices in beef herds in northern California and likely in a larger geographic area in the western United States need to be updated in order to continue effective use of the currently available drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"9 ","pages":"txaf007"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment for enteric parasites is a common practice in beef cattle, yet little data is known about the prevalence of nematode and trematode parasite infections in beef cattle in the western United States. Likewise, the data on the efficacy of deworming practices and the presence of anthelmintic resistance (AR) of these parasites in this region is sparse. The current study collected evidence for the presence of nematode and trematode parasites in 18 herds of young beef cattle grazing either dryland or irrigated pasture in northern California as well as on efficacy and evidence of AR in a subgroup of herds. We found variable levels of fecal egg counts (FEC) ranging from 6 to 322 for the arithmetic mean eggs per gram (EPG) in the tested cattle groups. There was no difference in the number of EPG between herds grazing dryland or irrigated pasture (P = 0.54). We did not find any evidence for liver flukes or lungworms in the tested cattle. There was evidence of AR to macrocyclic lactones in all eight herds where fecal egg count reduction tests (FECRT) were performed, however due to types and execution of treatment applications and sample sizes, these results need to be interpreted with caution. The most common genus of third stage larvae in coproculture testing before treatment was Cooperia (between 55% and 98% of larvae) as well as post treatment for those herds undergoing FECRT (between 50% and 96%). Ostertagia was the second most frequent genus of larvae found in coproculture testing making up between 0% and 27% of larvae before treatment and between 5% and 50% of larvae after treatment. Anthelmintic practices in beef herds in northern California and likely in a larger geographic area in the western United States need to be updated in order to continue effective use of the currently available drugs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加利福尼亚牧场生长肉牛的胃肠道寄生虫负担和驱虫方法的效果。
治疗肠道寄生虫是肉牛的一种常见做法,但关于美国西部肉牛中线虫和吸虫寄生虫感染的流行程度的数据知之甚少。同样,关于该地区驱虫做法的效果和这些寄生虫的抗虫性(AR)的数据也很少。目前的研究收集了在加利福尼亚北部旱地或灌溉牧场放牧的18个年轻肉牛群中存在线虫和吸虫寄生虫的证据,以及在一个亚群中发生AR的有效性和证据。我们发现,在测试的牛组中,每克算术平均鸡蛋数(EPG)的粪蛋数(FEC)水平从6到322不等。旱地牧群与灌地牧群EPG数量差异无统计学意义(P = 0.54)。我们没有在测试的牛身上发现肝吸虫或肺虫的任何证据。在进行粪蛋计数减少试验(FECRT)的所有8个畜群中,都有证据表明对大环内酯有AR,然而,由于处理应用的类型和执行以及样本量的不同,这些结果需要谨慎解释。在处理前共育试验中,最常见的第三期幼虫属是Cooperia(占幼虫的55% - 98%),在进行FECRT的畜群中,处理后的幼虫属最多(占50% - 96%)。在共育试验中发现的第二常见的幼虫属是石尾鱼,在处理前占幼虫的0%至27%,在处理后占幼虫的5%至50%。在加利福尼亚北部和可能在美国西部更大的地理区域的肉牛群中的驱虫做法需要更新,以便继续有效使用目前可用的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
期刊最新文献
Variation in rate of body weight gain during pregnancy in beef heifers: association with early life health events and influence on progeny performance. Determination of available and total tract digestible phosphorus release curves for Microtech phytase. Genomic prediction of beef quality using GWAS-prioritized markers. Pistachio shell powder may be included in diets for weanling pigs without compromising growth performance or blood characteristics. Effect of Leucaena leucocephala intake on thyroid hormones and energy balance of Brangus bulls.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1