The Role of Medication Abortion Provision in US States Without Total Abortion Bans, 2023.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1111/psrh.12294
Isabel DoCampo, Rachel K Jones, Isaac Maddow-Zimet
{"title":"The Role of Medication Abortion Provision in US States Without Total Abortion Bans, 2023.","authors":"Isabel DoCampo, Rachel K Jones, Isaac Maddow-Zimet","doi":"10.1111/psrh.12294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication abortion has accounted for an increasing share of abortions in the United States (US) since the Food and Drug Administration's approval of mifepristone in 2000. This study offers updated estimates of medication abortions provided within the formal healthcare system in 2023 in US states without total abortion bans as well as a discussion of recent trends in medication abortion provision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Guttmacher Institute's Monthly Abortion Provision Study employs data from monthly samples of providers in a Bayesian hierarchical model to produce estimates of abortions provided within the formal healthcare system. We estimate the number and share of medication abortions provided in 2023 in states without total abortion bans and the share of abortions provided through telemedicine-only clinics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinicians provided 648,500 medication abortions within the formal healthcare system in 2023 in states without total bans (90% uncertainty interval: 640,720-657,860), representing 63% of all abortions. Ten percent of all abortions were provided by telemedicine-only clinics. The number of medication abortions provided in US states without total abortion bans increased by 19% between 2019 and 2020, and by 32% between 2020 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Medication abortion plays a critical role in the US abortion access landscape. Medication abortion provision has accelerated since 2019, likely due to COVID-era policies that facilitated the expansion of telemedicine medication abortion provision. This shift has created essential access for individuals navigating abortion bans and other barriers to care since the removal of federal abortion protections.</p>","PeriodicalId":47632,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":"3-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psrh.12294","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medication abortion has accounted for an increasing share of abortions in the United States (US) since the Food and Drug Administration's approval of mifepristone in 2000. This study offers updated estimates of medication abortions provided within the formal healthcare system in 2023 in US states without total abortion bans as well as a discussion of recent trends in medication abortion provision.

Methods: The Guttmacher Institute's Monthly Abortion Provision Study employs data from monthly samples of providers in a Bayesian hierarchical model to produce estimates of abortions provided within the formal healthcare system. We estimate the number and share of medication abortions provided in 2023 in states without total abortion bans and the share of abortions provided through telemedicine-only clinics.

Results: Clinicians provided 648,500 medication abortions within the formal healthcare system in 2023 in states without total bans (90% uncertainty interval: 640,720-657,860), representing 63% of all abortions. Ten percent of all abortions were provided by telemedicine-only clinics. The number of medication abortions provided in US states without total abortion bans increased by 19% between 2019 and 2020, and by 32% between 2020 and 2023.

Discussion: Medication abortion plays a critical role in the US abortion access landscape. Medication abortion provision has accelerated since 2019, likely due to COVID-era policies that facilitated the expansion of telemedicine medication abortion provision. This shift has created essential access for individuals navigating abortion bans and other barriers to care since the removal of federal abortion protections.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物流产条款在没有完全禁止堕胎的美国各州的作用,2023。
背景:自2000年美国食品和药物管理局批准米非司酮以来,药物流产在美国流产中所占的比例越来越大。本研究提供了2023年美国各州正式医疗保健系统内没有全面禁止堕胎的药物流产的最新估计,并讨论了药物流产提供的最新趋势。方法:古特马赫研究所的每月堕胎提供研究采用了贝叶斯层次模型中每月提供者样本的数据,以产生在正规医疗保健系统内提供的堕胎估计。我们估计了2023年在没有完全禁止堕胎的州提供的药物堕胎的数量和份额,以及通过远程医疗诊所提供的堕胎份额。结果:2023年,在没有全面禁令的州,临床医生在正式医疗保健系统内提供了648,500例药物流产(90%不确定区间:640,720-657,860),占所有流产的63%。10%的堕胎是由远程医疗诊所提供的。在没有全面禁止堕胎的美国各州,药物流产的数量在2019年至2020年期间增加了19%,在2020年至2023年期间增加了32%。讨论:药物流产在美国堕胎准入中起着关键作用。自2019年以来,药物流产服务加速增长,这可能是由于新冠疫情时期的政策促进了远程医疗药物流产服务的扩大。自从取消联邦堕胎保护以来,这种转变为个人绕过堕胎禁令和其他障碍获得护理创造了必要的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health provides the latest peer-reviewed, policy-relevant research and analysis on sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and other developed countries. For more than four decades, Perspectives has offered unique insights into how reproductive health issues relate to one another; how they are affected by policies and programs; and their implications for individuals and societies. Published four times a year, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health includes original research, special reports and commentaries on the latest developments in the field of sexual and reproductive health, as well as staff-written summaries of recent findings in the field.
期刊最新文献
How Are Healthcare Providers Conscientiously Objecting to Abortion in Australia? A Qualitative Study. Avoidance or Pursuit of Crisis Pregnancy Center Resources Among Abortion-Seeking Clients in Mississippi. An Exploration of the Views and Perspectives of Australian Trans and Gender Diverse Individuals About Transvaginal Ultrasound. "Just Stay Home and Wait It Out": Exploring Challenges Accessing Care for Miscarriage in Indiana. Partners in Contraceptive Choice and Knowledge: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a US Statewide Contraceptive Access Initiative.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1