Aided Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) interventions in India: A scoping review and quality appraisal.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Augmentative and Alternative Communication Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1080/07434618.2025.2458861
Vineetha Sara Philip, Swathi Geetha, Anitha Naittee Abraham
{"title":"Aided Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) interventions in India: A scoping review and quality appraisal.","authors":"Vineetha Sara Philip, Swathi Geetha, Anitha Naittee Abraham","doi":"10.1080/07434618.2025.2458861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current scoping review aims to map the existing research on aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) interventions in India, identify the gaps in the existing literature, and guide future research priorities. A comprehensive search between 1992 and 2022 yielded 39 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Studies were summarized in terms of publication details, treatment settings and geographical distribution, participant characteristics, study purpose, research design, dependent variables, outcome measures, independent variables, study findings, and quality appraisal. A relatively large proportion of studies originated from the southern part of India. A considerable increase was noted in the number of intervention studies published over the last decade. Most of the intervention studies followed a quasi-experimental or a case study design and focused on investigating the effect of training on an AAC system on the performance of individuals with communication disorders. Largely, all studies reported positive effects of AAC intervention; however, based on the quality appraisal, only a handful of studies adhered to high standards. Hence, to elevate the quality of AAC intervention research in India, it is imperative to employ robust methodologies in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49234,"journal":{"name":"Augmentative and Alternative Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Augmentative and Alternative Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2025.2458861","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current scoping review aims to map the existing research on aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) interventions in India, identify the gaps in the existing literature, and guide future research priorities. A comprehensive search between 1992 and 2022 yielded 39 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Studies were summarized in terms of publication details, treatment settings and geographical distribution, participant characteristics, study purpose, research design, dependent variables, outcome measures, independent variables, study findings, and quality appraisal. A relatively large proportion of studies originated from the southern part of India. A considerable increase was noted in the number of intervention studies published over the last decade. Most of the intervention studies followed a quasi-experimental or a case study design and focused on investigating the effect of training on an AAC system on the performance of individuals with communication disorders. Largely, all studies reported positive effects of AAC intervention; however, based on the quality appraisal, only a handful of studies adhered to high standards. Hence, to elevate the quality of AAC intervention research in India, it is imperative to employ robust methodologies in future studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助辅助和替代沟通(AAC)干预在印度:范围审查和质量评价。
当前的范围审查旨在绘制印度关于辅助增强和替代传播(AAC)干预措施的现有研究的地图,确定现有文献中的差距,并指导未来的研究重点。在1992年至2022年间的全面搜索中,有39项研究符合纳入标准。从发表细节、治疗设置和地理分布、参与者特征、研究目的、研究设计、因变量、结果测量、自变量、研究结果和质量评价等方面对研究进行总结。相对较大比例的研究来自印度南部。在过去十年中,发表的干预研究的数量有了相当大的增长。大多数干预研究遵循准实验或案例研究设计,并侧重于调查AAC系统训练对沟通障碍个体表现的影响。基本上,所有的研究都报告了AAC干预的积极作用;然而,从质量评价的角度来看,只有少数研究达到了较高的标准。因此,为了提高印度AAC干预研究的质量,在未来的研究中必须采用稳健的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Augmentative and Alternative Communication
Augmentative and Alternative Communication AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC), Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) publishes scientific articles related to the field of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) that report research concerning assessment, treatment, rehabilitation, and education of people who use or have the potential to use AAC systems; or that discuss theory, technology, and systems development relevant to AAC. The broad range of topic included in the Journal reflects the development of this field internationally. Manuscripts submitted to AAC should fall within one of the following categories, AND MUST COMPLY with associated page maximums listed on page 3 of the Manuscript Preparation Guide. Research articles (full peer review), These manuscripts report the results of original empirical research, including studies using qualitative and quantitative methodologies, with both group and single-case experimental research designs (e.g, Binger et al., 2008; Petroi et al., 2014). Technical, research, and intervention notes (full peer review): These are brief manuscripts that address methodological, statistical, technical, or clinical issues or innovations that are of relevance to the AAC community and are designed to bring the research community’s attention to areas that have been minimally or poorly researched in the past (e.g., research note: Thunberg et al., 2016; intervention notes: Laubscher et al., 2019).
期刊最新文献
Introduction to the forum on the role of basic science in AAC access. Identifying P300 brain-computer interface training strategies for AAC in children: a focus group study. Move to learn: considerations for providing upright, hands-free, self-initiated mobility to children with severe physical and communication disabilities. Consideration of artificial intelligence applications for interpreting communicative movements by individuals with visual and/or motor disabilities. Environmental factors contributing to using spelling in communication: Perceptions of literate aided communicators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1