Opioid use prior to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is associated with inferior patient-reported outcomes and lower rates of achieving patient acceptable symptom state in the early postoperative period

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.042
Justin J. Greiner MD , Zachary J. Herman MD , Michael Fox MD , Shaquille Charles MD, MS , Nicholas Drain MD , Noel B. Carlos BA , Bryson Lesniak MD , Albert Lin MD
{"title":"Opioid use prior to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is associated with inferior patient-reported outcomes and lower rates of achieving patient acceptable symptom state in the early postoperative period","authors":"Justin J. Greiner MD ,&nbsp;Zachary J. Herman MD ,&nbsp;Michael Fox MD ,&nbsp;Shaquille Charles MD, MS ,&nbsp;Nicholas Drain MD ,&nbsp;Noel B. Carlos BA ,&nbsp;Bryson Lesniak MD ,&nbsp;Albert Lin MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Preoperative opioid use is a risk factor for complications and diminished outcomes following rotator cuff repair (RCR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of preoperative opioid use on clinically relevant parameters of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following RCR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>A consecutive series of patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR from 2018 to 2020 were included. Preoperative opioid use within 1 year of surgery was determined and cumulative morphine milligram equivalents (MME) calculated. Preoperative and postoperative PROs at 3 and 6 months included visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES). Proportion of patients achieving clinically relevant measures of </span>minimal clinically important difference<span> (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) was determined. Multivariate linear regression was used to identify factors associated with PROs.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>760 patients (52% female) with mean age of 60 (range 49-73) years were included. 480 patients (63%) had no history of opioid prescriptions, while 280 (37%) had an opioid prescribed within 1 year prior to RCR. Preoperative, 3-month, and 6-month PROs were worse in the preoperative opioid-exposed cohort compared with opioid naïve (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). The rate of achieving PASS at 6 months was statistically greater in the opioid-naïve cohort than the preoperative opioid-exposed cohort for VAS for pain (58.7% vs. 40.2%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and trended toward statistical significance for ASES (39.9% vs. 26.7%, <em>P</em> = .003) and SSV (55.5% vs. 45.5%, <em>P</em><span> = .031). There were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of patients achieving MCID or SCB at 3 or 6 months for any PRO between cohorts. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that preoperative opioid use was predictive of lower ASES (β coefficient −7.47 [95% CI −5.2 to −9.7], </span><em>P</em> &lt; .001), lower SSV (β coefficient −7.21 [95% CI −9.61 to −4.8], <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and higher VAS for pain (β coefficient 1.07 [95% CI 0.81-1.33], <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with a history of preoperative opioid use had statistically significantly lower rates of achieving PASS for VAS for pain and demonstrated similar trends for ASES and SSV compared with opioid-naïve patients in the early postoperative period following arthroscopic RCR. However, there were no differences in the rate of achieving MCID and SCB for ASES, SSV, and VAS for pain between opioid use and opioid-naïve cohorts. Preoperative opioid use was a consistent factor associated with inferior outcomes for ASES, SSV, and VAS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":"34 9","pages":"Pages 2098-2106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105827462500117X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Preoperative opioid use is a risk factor for complications and diminished outcomes following rotator cuff repair (RCR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of preoperative opioid use on clinically relevant parameters of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following RCR.

Methods

A consecutive series of patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR from 2018 to 2020 were included. Preoperative opioid use within 1 year of surgery was determined and cumulative morphine milligram equivalents (MME) calculated. Preoperative and postoperative PROs at 3 and 6 months included visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES). Proportion of patients achieving clinically relevant measures of minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) was determined. Multivariate linear regression was used to identify factors associated with PROs.

Results

760 patients (52% female) with mean age of 60 (range 49-73) years were included. 480 patients (63%) had no history of opioid prescriptions, while 280 (37%) had an opioid prescribed within 1 year prior to RCR. Preoperative, 3-month, and 6-month PROs were worse in the preoperative opioid-exposed cohort compared with opioid naïve (P < .05). The rate of achieving PASS at 6 months was statistically greater in the opioid-naïve cohort than the preoperative opioid-exposed cohort for VAS for pain (58.7% vs. 40.2%, P < .001), and trended toward statistical significance for ASES (39.9% vs. 26.7%, P = .003) and SSV (55.5% vs. 45.5%, P = .031). There were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of patients achieving MCID or SCB at 3 or 6 months for any PRO between cohorts. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that preoperative opioid use was predictive of lower ASES (β coefficient −7.47 [95% CI −5.2 to −9.7], P < .001), lower SSV (β coefficient −7.21 [95% CI −9.61 to −4.8], P < .001), and higher VAS for pain (β coefficient 1.07 [95% CI 0.81-1.33], P < .001).

Conclusion

Patients with a history of preoperative opioid use had statistically significantly lower rates of achieving PASS for VAS for pain and demonstrated similar trends for ASES and SSV compared with opioid-naïve patients in the early postoperative period following arthroscopic RCR. However, there were no differences in the rate of achieving MCID and SCB for ASES, SSV, and VAS for pain between opioid use and opioid-naïve cohorts. Preoperative opioid use was a consistent factor associated with inferior outcomes for ASES, SSV, and VAS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在关节镜下肩袖修复前使用阿片类药物与患者报告的预后较差以及术后早期达到患者可接受症状状态的较低率相关。
前言:术前使用阿片类药物是肩袖修复(RCR)术后并发症和预后降低的危险因素。本研究的目的是评估术前阿片类药物使用对RCR患者报告结局(pro)临床相关参数的影响。方法:纳入2018年至2020年连续接受关节镜RCR的患者。确定术前一年内阿片类药物的使用情况,并计算累积吗啡毫克当量(MME)。术前和术后3和6个月的PROs包括疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、肩部主观值(SSV)和美国肩关节外科医生肩部评分(ASES)。确定达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)、实质性临床获益(SCB)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)的临床相关指标的患者比例。采用多元线性回归确定与PROs相关的因素。结果:760例患者(52%为女性),平均年龄60岁(49-73岁)。480名患者(63%)没有阿片类药物处方史,280名患者(37%)在RCR前一年内服用过阿片类药物。术前、3个月和6个月阿片类药物的PROs比阿片类药物naïve更差(p结论:术前有阿片类药物使用史的患者在疼痛VAS达到PASS的比例具有统计学意义,并且在关节镜RCR术后早期,与阿片类药物患者相比,asa和SSV的趋势相似naïve。然而,在阿片类药物使用和阿片类药物naïve队列之间,针对疼痛的as、SSV和VAS实现MCID和SCB的比率没有差异。术前使用阿片类药物是与as、SSV和VAS预后较差相关的一致因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Muscle activation variability in relation to functional internal rotation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for rotator cuff repair surgery Functional and radiographic outcomes after surgical management of complex proximal ulna fractures: a retrospective case series Pyrolytic carbon head hemiarthroplasty vs. cobalt-chromium head for proximal humerus fractures: a short-term follow-up study Incidence and risk factors for aseptic glenoid baseplate loosening in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty using the Aramis implant baseplate with a minimum of 2 years follow-up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1