Talking While Walking After Concussion: Acute Effects of Concussion on Speech Pauses and Gait Speed.

IF 3.7 Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1177/15459683251317184
Shu Yang, Paula K Johnson, Colby R Hansen, Elisabeth A Wilde, Melissa M Cortez, Leland E Dibble, Peter C Fino, Tiphanie E Raffegeau
{"title":"Talking While Walking After Concussion: Acute Effects of Concussion on Speech Pauses and Gait Speed.","authors":"Shu Yang, Paula K Johnson, Colby R Hansen, Elisabeth A Wilde, Melissa M Cortez, Leland E Dibble, Peter C Fino, Tiphanie E Raffegeau","doi":"10.1177/15459683251317184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDeficits in dual-tasks (DT) are frequently observed post-concussion (ie, mild Traumatic Brain Injury). However, traditional DT may not be relevant to daily life. Walking while talking elicits DT costs in healthy adults and is part of daily life.ObjectiveWe investigated the effect of concussion on walking with extemporaneous speech and explored relationships between DT and acute symptoms.MethodsParticipants with recent concussion (<14 days post-injury) and controls completed 3 tasks: single-task gait without speaking (ST<sub>G</sub>), single-task speaking without walking (ST<sub>S</sub>), and walking while speaking (DT). Silent pauses in speech audio reflected cognitive performance, and gait was quantified using inertial sensors. We used linear mixed models to compare groups and conditions and explored associations with self-reported symptoms.ResultsBoth concussion (n = 19) and control (n = 18) groups exhibited longer speech pauses (<i>P</i> < .001), slower walking speeds (<i>P</i> < .001), and slower cadence (<i>P</i> < .001) during the DT compared to ST conditions. There were no group differences or interactions for speech pauses (<i>P</i> > .424). The concussion group slowed down more during DT than the control group (group × task <i>P</i> = .032). Vestibular symptoms strongly associated with ST speech pause duration (ρ = .72), ST gait speed (ρ = -.75), and DT gait speed (ρ = -.78).ConclusionsExtemporaneous speech is well-practiced but challenging to complete while walking post-concussion. Strong associations between DT outcomes and vestibular-related symptoms suggest DT deficits vary with post-concussion symptomology. DT deficits may be deleterious to daily tasks post-concussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"355-364"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683251317184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundDeficits in dual-tasks (DT) are frequently observed post-concussion (ie, mild Traumatic Brain Injury). However, traditional DT may not be relevant to daily life. Walking while talking elicits DT costs in healthy adults and is part of daily life.ObjectiveWe investigated the effect of concussion on walking with extemporaneous speech and explored relationships between DT and acute symptoms.MethodsParticipants with recent concussion (<14 days post-injury) and controls completed 3 tasks: single-task gait without speaking (STG), single-task speaking without walking (STS), and walking while speaking (DT). Silent pauses in speech audio reflected cognitive performance, and gait was quantified using inertial sensors. We used linear mixed models to compare groups and conditions and explored associations with self-reported symptoms.ResultsBoth concussion (n = 19) and control (n = 18) groups exhibited longer speech pauses (P < .001), slower walking speeds (P < .001), and slower cadence (P < .001) during the DT compared to ST conditions. There were no group differences or interactions for speech pauses (P > .424). The concussion group slowed down more during DT than the control group (group × task P = .032). Vestibular symptoms strongly associated with ST speech pause duration (ρ = .72), ST gait speed (ρ = -.75), and DT gait speed (ρ = -.78).ConclusionsExtemporaneous speech is well-practiced but challenging to complete while walking post-concussion. Strong associations between DT outcomes and vestibular-related symptoms suggest DT deficits vary with post-concussion symptomology. DT deficits may be deleterious to daily tasks post-concussion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑震荡后边走边说:脑震荡对言语停顿和步态速度的急性影响。
背景:双重任务缺陷在脑震荡后(即轻度创伤性脑损伤)经常被观察到。然而,传统的DT可能与日常生活无关。在健康成年人中,边走边说话会引起DT成本,并且是日常生活的一部分。目的:观察脑震荡对即兴言语行走的影响,探讨DT与急性症状的关系。方法:近期脑震荡(G)、单任务说话不走路(STS)和边说边走(DT)的参与者。语音音频中的无声停顿反映了认知表现,步态使用惯性传感器进行量化。我们使用线性混合模型来比较组和条件,并探索与自我报告症状的关联。结果:脑震荡组(n = 19)和对照组(n = 18)均表现出较长的言语停顿(P P P P > .424)。脑震荡组在DT过程中比对照组慢(组×任务P = 0.032)。前庭症状与ST言语停顿时间(ρ = 0.72)、ST步速(ρ = - 0.75)和DT步速(ρ = - 0.78)密切相关。结论:即兴演讲训练有素,但很难在脑震荡后步行时完成。DT结果与前庭相关症状之间的强烈关联表明DT缺陷因脑震荡后症状而异。DT缺陷可能对脑震荡后的日常工作有害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Advancing Rigor and Relevance in Neurorehabilitation: New Article Types at Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. Post-Stroke Motor Fatigability: Defining and Studying the Impairments That Emerge During Prolonged Motor Tasks. Standardized International Manual of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Function After Stroke. Brain Network Connectivity During Resting-State and a Visuospatial Task as a Biomarker for Spatial Neglect in Stroke Patients. Optimizing the Approach to Calculating CST Lesion Load in Ischemic Stroke Patients for Understanding Motor Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1