Prospective and multicenter validation of the BETTY score for predicting perioperative outcomes after elective urological surgery.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Minerva Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06041-0
Alessandro Uleri, Michael Baboudjian, Gilles Pasticier, Victor Basset, Guillaume Cordier, Bernard Malavaud, Pourya Pashootan, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Guillaume Ploussard
{"title":"Prospective and multicenter validation of the BETTY score for predicting perioperative outcomes after elective urological surgery.","authors":"Alessandro Uleri, Michael Baboudjian, Gilles Pasticier, Victor Basset, Guillaume Cordier, Bernard Malavaud, Pourya Pashootan, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Guillaume Ploussard","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06041-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postoperative complications remain a significant challenge in surgical care. This study assessed the ability of the BETTY score, a novel user-friendly scoring system, to predict postoperative outcomes in a large multicenter cohort of urological surgeries. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of a prospective, nonrandomized multicenter trial including 415 patients undergoing elective urological surgeries in six French hospitals. The BETTY score, part of a smartphone app, incorporates pre- and intraoperative data to classify patients into risk categories. We evaluated multiple endpoints, including 90-day postoperative overall and major complications, length of stay, prolonged care after discharge, unplanned readmission, reoperation, and days alive and out of hospital. Of the 415 patients, 22% experienced postoperative complications, with 3.9% major complications. Unplanned readmissions, prolonged care after discharge, and reoperation occurred in 8%, 20%, and 2.4% of cases, respectively. We found significant correlations between the BETTY score and all endpoints analyzed. In multivariate analysis, the BETTY score was significantly associated with all postoperative events studied. These findings demonstrate the reliability of the BETTY score in predicting various postoperative outcomes in urological surgery patients, especially for patients undergoing major surgeries. This tool may help optimize perioperative care and improve patient outcomes, potentially contributing to more personalized surgical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06041-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postoperative complications remain a significant challenge in surgical care. This study assessed the ability of the BETTY score, a novel user-friendly scoring system, to predict postoperative outcomes in a large multicenter cohort of urological surgeries. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of a prospective, nonrandomized multicenter trial including 415 patients undergoing elective urological surgeries in six French hospitals. The BETTY score, part of a smartphone app, incorporates pre- and intraoperative data to classify patients into risk categories. We evaluated multiple endpoints, including 90-day postoperative overall and major complications, length of stay, prolonged care after discharge, unplanned readmission, reoperation, and days alive and out of hospital. Of the 415 patients, 22% experienced postoperative complications, with 3.9% major complications. Unplanned readmissions, prolonged care after discharge, and reoperation occurred in 8%, 20%, and 2.4% of cases, respectively. We found significant correlations between the BETTY score and all endpoints analyzed. In multivariate analysis, the BETTY score was significantly associated with all postoperative events studied. These findings demonstrate the reliability of the BETTY score in predicting various postoperative outcomes in urological surgery patients, especially for patients undergoing major surgeries. This tool may help optimize perioperative care and improve patient outcomes, potentially contributing to more personalized surgical care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BETTY评分预测择期泌尿外科手术围手术期预后的前瞻性和多中心验证。
术后并发症仍然是外科护理的重大挑战。本研究评估了BETTY评分(一种新颖的用户友好评分系统)在大型多中心泌尿外科手术队列中预测术后预后的能力。我们对一项前瞻性、非随机多中心试验进行了事后分析,该试验包括在法国6家医院接受选择性泌尿外科手术的415例患者。BETTY评分是智能手机应用程序的一部分,它结合术前和术中数据,将患者分为不同的风险类别。我们评估了多个终点,包括术后90天的总并发症和主要并发症、住院时间、出院后延长的护理时间、意外再入院、再手术、存活和出院天数。415例患者中,22%出现术后并发症,3.9%出现严重并发症。意外再入院、出院后延长护理和再手术分别占8%、20%和2.4%。我们发现BETTY评分与分析的所有终点之间存在显著相关性。在多变量分析中,BETTY评分与研究的所有术后事件显著相关。这些发现表明BETTY评分在预测泌尿外科患者,特别是大手术患者的各种术后预后方面是可靠的。该工具可能有助于优化围手术期护理和改善患者预后,可能有助于更个性化的手术护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
期刊最新文献
The updated 2021 EAU risk groups for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: what have we learned four years after implementation? Multicentric evaluation of a lateral-based anterior vaginal wall flap for female urethral stricture repair. External validation and comparison of nomograms for prediction of long-term disease recurrence and survival for bladder cancer patients who undergo radical cystectomy. Soft ureteral stents significantly reduce stent-related symptoms compared to firm ureteral stents: a prospective, randomized trial. Comparative efficacy and safety of intelligent pressure-controlled versus flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath for 2-4 cm renal calculi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1