Match Accuracy of Burned Teeth: A pilot study of allied dental professionals.

Brenda T Bradshaw, Marsha A Voelker, Samantha C Vest, Sinjini Sikdar
{"title":"Match Accuracy of Burned Teeth: A pilot study of allied dental professionals.","authors":"Brenda T Bradshaw, Marsha A Voelker, Samantha C Vest, Sinjini Sikdar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> The purpose of this pilot study was to assess allied dental professionals' match accuracy of burned teeth; a skill required by disaster victim identification (DVI) team members.<b>Methods</b> This cross-sectional study used a convenience sample of registered dental hygienists (RDH) (n=15) and dental assistants (DA) (n=15) to assess their match accuracy of burned teeth with simulated antemortem (AM) and postmortem (PM) images. Fifteen human teeth were heated at 400°C for 15 minutes. Prior to and following heat alteration, each tooth was photographed and radiographed. Images were presented to participants in randomized order, and they were instructed to correctly match them with the teeth. Each participant completed 60 matches for the 15 teeth with 1 set of pre- and post-burned photographs and 1 pre- and post-burned periapical (PA) radiographs. Following the match accuracy activity, participants completed an electronic questionnaire to report demographic data and indicate their perceptions of performed tasks.<b>Results</b> A one-sided one-sample binomial proportion test revealed that on average, participants demonstrated more than 80% match accuracy of the teeth with AM and PM images (<i>p</i>=0.0003). When compared by profession, the average match accuracy was 82.1% for RDHs and 72.7% for DAs. A two-sided two-sample binomial proportion test revealed no statistically significant difference of performance between the professions (<i>p</i>=0.8505). A one-sided linear trend test indicated no significant association between match accuracy and years of work experience (<i>p</i>=0.2371).<b>Conclusion</b> On average, participants demonstrated the ability to transfer professional skills to match burned teeth with simulated AM and PM images. Differences in professional background and years of work experience did not have a significant impact. More research is needed to best understand allied dental professionals' transferrable DVI skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":52471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","volume":"99 1","pages":"32-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this pilot study was to assess allied dental professionals' match accuracy of burned teeth; a skill required by disaster victim identification (DVI) team members.Methods This cross-sectional study used a convenience sample of registered dental hygienists (RDH) (n=15) and dental assistants (DA) (n=15) to assess their match accuracy of burned teeth with simulated antemortem (AM) and postmortem (PM) images. Fifteen human teeth were heated at 400°C for 15 minutes. Prior to and following heat alteration, each tooth was photographed and radiographed. Images were presented to participants in randomized order, and they were instructed to correctly match them with the teeth. Each participant completed 60 matches for the 15 teeth with 1 set of pre- and post-burned photographs and 1 pre- and post-burned periapical (PA) radiographs. Following the match accuracy activity, participants completed an electronic questionnaire to report demographic data and indicate their perceptions of performed tasks.Results A one-sided one-sample binomial proportion test revealed that on average, participants demonstrated more than 80% match accuracy of the teeth with AM and PM images (p=0.0003). When compared by profession, the average match accuracy was 82.1% for RDHs and 72.7% for DAs. A two-sided two-sample binomial proportion test revealed no statistically significant difference of performance between the professions (p=0.8505). A one-sided linear trend test indicated no significant association between match accuracy and years of work experience (p=0.2371).Conclusion On average, participants demonstrated the ability to transfer professional skills to match burned teeth with simulated AM and PM images. Differences in professional background and years of work experience did not have a significant impact. More research is needed to best understand allied dental professionals' transferrable DVI skills.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Hygiene is the refereed, scientific publication of the American Dental Hygienists’ Association. It promotes the publication of original research related to the practice and education of dental hygiene. It supports the development and dissemination of a dental hygiene body of knowledge through scientific inquiry in basic, applied, and clinical research.
期刊最新文献
Advances and Challenges in Pediatric Oral Health. DIY Orthodontic Relapse Correction Gone Wrong: A case study. Fluoride in 2025. The Role of Reporting Guidelines in Research Publication. Improving Dental Hygiene Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Confidence Toward Prenatal Oral Health Through Experiential Learning: A pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1