Looking at Social Interactions in Medical Education with Dual Eye-Tracking Technology: A Scoping Review.

MedEdPublish (2016) Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/mep.20577.2
Johannes Lorenz, Juliane Zevano, Nils Otto, Bertrand Schneider, Cihan Papan, Markus Missler, Dogus Darici
{"title":"Looking at Social Interactions in Medical Education with Dual Eye-Tracking Technology: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Johannes Lorenz, Juliane Zevano, Nils Otto, Bertrand Schneider, Cihan Papan, Markus Missler, Dogus Darici","doi":"10.12688/mep.20577.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Social interactions are fundamental to effective medical practice, yet assessing these complex dynamics in educational settings remains challenging. This review critically examines the emerging use of dual eye-tracking technology as a novel method to quantify, analyze, and enhance social interactions within medical education contexts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a scoping review of the literature, focusing on studies that utilized dual eye-tracking within medical education contexts. Our search included multiple databases and journals. We extracted information on technical setups, areas of application, participant characteristics, dual eye-tracking metrics, and main findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies published between 2012 and 2021 met the inclusion criteria, with 90% utilizing dual screen-based- and 10% dual mobile eye-tracking. All studies were conducted in the context of surgical training, primarily focusing on laparoscopic surgery. We identified two main applications of dual eye-tracking: (1) as an educational <i>intervention</i> to improve collaboration, (2) as a diagnostic tool to identify interaction pattern that were associated with learning. Key metrics included joint visual attention, gaze delay and joint mental effort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dual eye-tracking offers a promising technology for enhancing medical education by providing high-resolution, real-time data on social interactions. However, current research is limited by small sample sizes, outdated technology, and a narrow focus on surgical contexts. We discuss the broader implications and potential for medical education research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"14 ","pages":"215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.20577.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Social interactions are fundamental to effective medical practice, yet assessing these complex dynamics in educational settings remains challenging. This review critically examines the emerging use of dual eye-tracking technology as a novel method to quantify, analyze, and enhance social interactions within medical education contexts.

Materials and methods: We performed a scoping review of the literature, focusing on studies that utilized dual eye-tracking within medical education contexts. Our search included multiple databases and journals. We extracted information on technical setups, areas of application, participant characteristics, dual eye-tracking metrics, and main findings.

Results: Ten studies published between 2012 and 2021 met the inclusion criteria, with 90% utilizing dual screen-based- and 10% dual mobile eye-tracking. All studies were conducted in the context of surgical training, primarily focusing on laparoscopic surgery. We identified two main applications of dual eye-tracking: (1) as an educational intervention to improve collaboration, (2) as a diagnostic tool to identify interaction pattern that were associated with learning. Key metrics included joint visual attention, gaze delay and joint mental effort.

Conclusion: Dual eye-tracking offers a promising technology for enhancing medical education by providing high-resolution, real-time data on social interactions. However, current research is limited by small sample sizes, outdated technology, and a narrow focus on surgical contexts. We discuss the broader implications and potential for medical education research and practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用双眼动追踪技术观察医学教育中的社会互动:范围综述。
目的:社会互动是有效医疗实践的基础,然而在教育环境中评估这些复杂的动态仍然具有挑战性。这篇综述批判性地考察了双眼动追踪技术作为一种量化、分析和增强医学教育背景下社会互动的新方法的新兴应用。材料和方法:我们对文献进行了范围审查,重点关注在医学教育背景下使用双眼动追踪的研究。我们的搜索包括多个数据库和期刊。我们提取了有关技术设置、应用领域、参与者特征、双眼动追踪指标和主要发现的信息。结果:2012年至2021年间发表的10项研究符合纳入标准,其中90%使用基于屏幕的双眼动追踪,10%使用双移动眼动追踪。所有的研究都是在外科训练的背景下进行的,主要集中在腹腔镜手术。我们确定了双眼动追踪的两个主要应用:(1)作为改善协作的教育干预,(2)作为识别与学习相关的交互模式的诊断工具。关键指标包括联合视觉注意、凝视延迟和联合精神努力。结论:双眼动追踪技术通过提供高分辨率、实时的社会互动数据,为加强医学教育提供了一种很有前途的技术。然而,目前的研究受到样本量小、技术过时以及对外科背景的狭隘关注的限制。我们讨论了医学教育研究和实践的更广泛的影响和潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Medical Education Escape Rooms: A Scoping Review Using the Kirpatrick Model. 10 tips for clinical educators in designing and delivering learning experiences to improve clinical reasoning for medical students. Beyond bikini medicine: An analysis of  Sex- and Gender-Informed Medicine in a preclinical undergraduate medical education. Building recommendations for Mandatory Continuing Medical Education in developing countries: A nominal group study of regional experts. Self-reported impacts one year after a brief health equity/implicit bias course for academic clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1