Benchmarking the diagnostic performance of open source LLMs in 1933 Eurorad case reports

IF 15.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES NPJ Digital Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1038/s41746-025-01488-3
Su Hwan Kim, Severin Schramm, Lisa C. Adams, Rickmer Braren, Keno K. Bressem, Matthias Keicher, Paul-Sören Platzek, Karolin Johanna Paprottka, Claus Zimmer, Dennis M. Hedderich, Benedikt Wiestler
{"title":"Benchmarking the diagnostic performance of open source LLMs in 1933 Eurorad case reports","authors":"Su Hwan Kim, Severin Schramm, Lisa C. Adams, Rickmer Braren, Keno K. Bressem, Matthias Keicher, Paul-Sören Platzek, Karolin Johanna Paprottka, Claus Zimmer, Dennis M. Hedderich, Benedikt Wiestler","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01488-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have created new ways to support radiological diagnostics. While both open-source and proprietary LLMs can address privacy concerns through local or cloud deployment, open-source models provide advantages in continuity of access, and potentially lower costs. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of fifteen open-source LLMs and one closed-source LLM (GPT-4o) in 1,933 cases from the Eurorad library. LLMs provided differential diagnoses based on clinical history and imaging findings. Responses were considered correct if the true diagnosis appeared in the top three suggestions. Models were further tested on 60 non-public brain MRI cases from a tertiary hospital to assess generalizability. In both datasets, GPT-4o demonstrated superior performance, closely followed by Llama-3-70B, revealing how open-source LLMs are rapidly closing the gap to proprietary models. Our findings highlight the potential of open-source LLMs as decision support tools for radiological differential diagnosis in challenging, real-world cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01488-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have created new ways to support radiological diagnostics. While both open-source and proprietary LLMs can address privacy concerns through local or cloud deployment, open-source models provide advantages in continuity of access, and potentially lower costs. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of fifteen open-source LLMs and one closed-source LLM (GPT-4o) in 1,933 cases from the Eurorad library. LLMs provided differential diagnoses based on clinical history and imaging findings. Responses were considered correct if the true diagnosis appeared in the top three suggestions. Models were further tested on 60 non-public brain MRI cases from a tertiary hospital to assess generalizability. In both datasets, GPT-4o demonstrated superior performance, closely followed by Llama-3-70B, revealing how open-source LLMs are rapidly closing the gap to proprietary models. Our findings highlight the potential of open-source LLMs as decision support tools for radiological differential diagnosis in challenging, real-world cases.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在1933年欧洲病例报告中对开源法学硕士的诊断性能进行基准测试
大型语言模型(llm)的最新进展创造了支持放射诊断的新方法。虽然开源和专有llm都可以通过本地或云部署来解决隐私问题,但开源模型在访问的连续性方面具有优势,并且可能降低成本。本研究评估了euroad文库中1,933例病例中15个开源LLM和1个闭源LLM (gpt - 40)的诊断性能。LLMs根据临床病史和影像学表现提供鉴别诊断。如果真实诊断出现在前三个建议中,则认为回答是正确的。对某三级医院非公开的60例脑MRI病例进行了进一步的模型测试,以评估模型的通用性。在这两个数据集中,gpt - 40表现出了卓越的性能,紧随其后的是lama-3- 70b,这表明开源法学硕士正在迅速缩小与专有模型的差距。我们的研究结果强调了开源法学硕士作为具有挑战性的现实病例放射学鉴别诊断决策支持工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
期刊最新文献
Mapping AI startup investment and innovation in healthcare using a five-tier AI systems complexity framework. Large language model-augmented offline reinforcement learning framework for sepsis management in critical care. Wearable ECG and PPG for anxiety detection: a translational digital medicine perspective. Unified multimodal learning for stroke triage: joint detection, scoring, and segmentation of acute ischemic stroke. Soft multiclass feature augmented deep learning to predict tumor origins using cytology or histology whole slide images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1