Physical Property Responses of Shale Matrix and Its Surrounding Rocks to CO2/Oxy-Coal Combustion Flue Gas Exposure: Implications for Fluid Storage Stability Assessment

IF 7.1 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c06095
Yi Xu, Zengmin Lun, Haitao Wang, Wenjin Hu, Xia Zhou, Chunpeng Zhao, Dengfeng Zhang
{"title":"Physical Property Responses of Shale Matrix and Its Surrounding Rocks to CO2/Oxy-Coal Combustion Flue Gas Exposure: Implications for Fluid Storage Stability Assessment","authors":"Yi Xu, Zengmin Lun, Haitao Wang, Wenjin Hu, Xia Zhou, Chunpeng Zhao, Dengfeng Zhang","doi":"10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c06095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To preliminarily validate the storage stability of CO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, and NO<i><sub><i>x</i></sub></i> within gas-bearing shale reservoirs, one representative shale and its surrounding rocks were exposed to CO<sub>2</sub>/flue gas at 30 MPa and 353.15 K for 60 days, and changes in their physical properties were investigated. Results indicated that the CO<sub>2</sub>/flue gas–H<sub>2</sub>O exposure raised sample complexity via mineral dissolution and precipitation. Mineral dissolution increased micropores of the roof rock, while precipitation decreased micropores of the shale and floor rock and mesopores of all samples. Thereinto, the flue gas–H<sub>2</sub>O exposure demonstrated higher influential degrees than those of the CO<sub>2</sub>–H<sub>2</sub>O exposure. Furthermore, the CO<sub>2</sub>–H<sub>2</sub>O exposure enlarged macropores of the surrounding rocks but narrowed those of the shale. The flue gas–H<sub>2</sub>O exposure oppositely affects macropores as the does, which is more conducive for fluid storage. Although the CO<sub>2</sub>–H<sub>2</sub>O and flue gas–H<sub>2</sub>O exposures transformed small-scale pores into medium- and large-scale pores/fractures, they reduced sample permeability by 62.51–86.43% and 65.47–90.21%, respectively. Such phenomena suggested stronger flue gas–H<sub>2</sub>O–shale interactions and a better sealing capability of the surrounding rocks for flue gas than for CO<sub>2</sub>. Overall, flue gas can react with shale/surrounding rocks more intensively than CO<sub>2</sub>, making shale reservoirs a promising geologic formation for the stable storage of CO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, and NO<i><sub><i>x</i></sub></i>.","PeriodicalId":25,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c06095","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To preliminarily validate the storage stability of CO2, SO2, and NOx within gas-bearing shale reservoirs, one representative shale and its surrounding rocks were exposed to CO2/flue gas at 30 MPa and 353.15 K for 60 days, and changes in their physical properties were investigated. Results indicated that the CO2/flue gas–H2O exposure raised sample complexity via mineral dissolution and precipitation. Mineral dissolution increased micropores of the roof rock, while precipitation decreased micropores of the shale and floor rock and mesopores of all samples. Thereinto, the flue gas–H2O exposure demonstrated higher influential degrees than those of the CO2–H2O exposure. Furthermore, the CO2–H2O exposure enlarged macropores of the surrounding rocks but narrowed those of the shale. The flue gas–H2O exposure oppositely affects macropores as the does, which is more conducive for fluid storage. Although the CO2–H2O and flue gas–H2O exposures transformed small-scale pores into medium- and large-scale pores/fractures, they reduced sample permeability by 62.51–86.43% and 65.47–90.21%, respectively. Such phenomena suggested stronger flue gas–H2O–shale interactions and a better sealing capability of the surrounding rocks for flue gas than for CO2. Overall, flue gas can react with shale/surrounding rocks more intensively than CO2, making shale reservoirs a promising geologic formation for the stable storage of CO2, SO2, and NOx.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1470
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is a prestigious weekly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Chemical Society. Dedicated to advancing the principles of green chemistry and green engineering, it covers a wide array of research topics including green chemistry, green engineering, biomass, alternative energy, and life cycle assessment. The journal welcomes submissions in various formats, including Letters, Articles, Features, and Perspectives (Reviews), that address the challenges of sustainability in the chemical enterprise and contribute to the advancement of sustainable practices. Join us in shaping the future of sustainable chemistry and engineering.
期刊最新文献
Sustainable Biosynthesis of Diverse Fatty Acid Esters of Hydroxy Fatty Acids (FAHFAs) for Industrial Production Self-Powered Water Electrolysis with Sulfide Waste as Consumable Improved Performance of Catalysts Containing Pt, Pt–Sn, and V in the Dehydrogenation of n-Butane by Radio-Frequency Induction Heating Physical Property Responses of Shale Matrix and Its Surrounding Rocks to CO2/Oxy-Coal Combustion Flue Gas Exposure: Implications for Fluid Storage Stability Assessment Electrochemical Reduction Pathways from Goethite to Green Iron in Alkaline Solution with Silicate Additive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1