An investigation of barriers and facilitators to young drivers’ engagement with post-licensure training

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2025.02.010
David Crundall, Editha van Loon
{"title":"An investigation of barriers and facilitators to young drivers’ engagement with post-licensure training","authors":"David Crundall,&nbsp;Editha van Loon","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Young drivers are over-represented in collision statistics partly because pre-licensure training does not fully provide young drivers with all the necessary skills to be safe on the road. Despite this, post-licensure on-road training does not appear popular with young drivers, even when offered for free. To investigate their appetite for training we surveyed 745 young drivers, and asked whether they would be willing to engage with a hypothetical free training course (based on a real course). Less than a third of the sample reported they would be likely to engage with training ‘at the moment’, though acceptance rates were higher when asked if there would have been likely to sign up ‘in the past’ or ‘in the future’. Proportional odds logistical regression models suggested that reasons to avoid training included the admission that they ‘would rather do something else’ with their time, and that they ‘did not need training’. Factors that would increase their engagement with training included ‘the reputation of the training company’, ‘an understanding of why the course is offered for free’, and ‘a certificate of participation’. When asked whether there was any specific training that they felt would benefit them, responses highlighted difficult driving conditions (e.g., snow, ice) and new technology (e.g., electric vehicles, Advanced Driver Assistance Systems). Recommendations are made to design post-licensure training interventions that will increase young driver engagement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"110 ","pages":"Pages 104-117"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825000579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Young drivers are over-represented in collision statistics partly because pre-licensure training does not fully provide young drivers with all the necessary skills to be safe on the road. Despite this, post-licensure on-road training does not appear popular with young drivers, even when offered for free. To investigate their appetite for training we surveyed 745 young drivers, and asked whether they would be willing to engage with a hypothetical free training course (based on a real course). Less than a third of the sample reported they would be likely to engage with training ‘at the moment’, though acceptance rates were higher when asked if there would have been likely to sign up ‘in the past’ or ‘in the future’. Proportional odds logistical regression models suggested that reasons to avoid training included the admission that they ‘would rather do something else’ with their time, and that they ‘did not need training’. Factors that would increase their engagement with training included ‘the reputation of the training company’, ‘an understanding of why the course is offered for free’, and ‘a certificate of participation’. When asked whether there was any specific training that they felt would benefit them, responses highlighted difficult driving conditions (e.g., snow, ice) and new technology (e.g., electric vehicles, Advanced Driver Assistance Systems). Recommendations are made to design post-licensure training interventions that will increase young driver engagement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项调查的障碍和促进年轻司机参与后执照培训
在碰撞统计数据中,年轻司机的比例过高,部分原因是驾照前培训并没有完全向年轻司机提供在道路上安全行驶所需的所有必要技能。尽管如此,获得驾照后的上路培训似乎并不受年轻司机的欢迎,即使是免费提供的。为了调查他们对培训的兴趣,我们调查了745名年轻司机,并询问他们是否愿意参加一个假设的免费培训课程(基于真实课程)。不到三分之一的受访者表示他们“现在”可能会参加培训,尽管当被问及“过去”或“将来”是否有可能参加培训时,接受率更高。比例赔率逻辑回归模型显示,避免培训的原因包括承认他们“宁愿把时间花在其他事情上”,以及他们“不需要培训”。增加他们参与培训的因素包括“培训公司的声誉”、“了解为什么课程是免费的”和“参与证书”。当被问及是否有任何特定的培训对他们有益时,他们的回答强调了困难的驾驶条件(如雪、冰)和新技术(如电动汽车、高级驾驶辅助系统)。建议设计执照后培训干预措施,以增加年轻司机的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Investigating risky riding behaviors among young motorcyclists in Bangladesh using a modified motorcycle rider behavior questionnaire Whose safety should come first in case of an unavoidable crash involving a driverless passenger vehicle? a nationwide snapshot of public perceptions and expectations Understanding driver visual distraction and its relationship with speeding: Insights from naturalistic driving data Impact analysis of commuting on multidimensional well-being: The mediation effects of social network and travel satisfaction Scales and inventories in traffic psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1