Danny H. Zhang , Jeffrey Zhou , Joseph D. Wickens , Andrew G. Veale , Luke E. Hallum
{"title":"Apnea and hypopnea event detection using EEG, EMG, and sleep stage labels in a cohort of patients with suspected sleep apnea","authors":"Danny H. Zhang , Jeffrey Zhou , Joseph D. Wickens , Andrew G. Veale , Luke E. Hallum","doi":"10.1016/j.bspc.2025.107628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Automating the screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of sleep apnea (SA) is potentially clinically useful. We present machine-learning models which detect SA and hypopnea events from the overnight electroencephalogram (EEG) and electromyogram (EMG), and we explain detection mechanisms. We tested four models using a novel data set comprising six-channel EEG and two-channel EMG recorded from 26 consecutive patients; recordings were expertly labeled with sleep stage and apnea/hypopnea events. For Model 1, EEG subband power and sample entropy were features used to train and test a random forest classifier. Model 2 was identical to Model 1, but we used EMG, not EEG. Model 3 was a simple decision strategy contingent upon sleep stage label. Model 4 was identical to Model 1, but we used EEG subband power, sample entropy, and sleep stage label. All models performed above chance (Matthews correlation coefficient, MCC <span><math><mo>></mo></math></span> 0): Model 4 (leave-one-patient-out cross-validated MCC = 0.314) outperformed Model 3 (0.230) which outperformed Models 2 and 1 (0.147 and 0.154, respectively). Results indicate that sleep stage label alone is sufficient to detect apnea/hypopnea events. Either EMG or EEG subband power and sample entropy can be used to detect apnea/hypopnea events, but these EEG features likely reflect contamination by EMG. Indeed, EMG power was modulated by apnea/hypopnea event beginning and end, and similar modulation appeared in EEG power. Machine-learning approaches to the detection of apnea/hypopnea events using overnight EEG must be explainable; they must account for EMG contamination and sleep stage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55362,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 107628"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746809425001399","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Automating the screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of sleep apnea (SA) is potentially clinically useful. We present machine-learning models which detect SA and hypopnea events from the overnight electroencephalogram (EEG) and electromyogram (EMG), and we explain detection mechanisms. We tested four models using a novel data set comprising six-channel EEG and two-channel EMG recorded from 26 consecutive patients; recordings were expertly labeled with sleep stage and apnea/hypopnea events. For Model 1, EEG subband power and sample entropy were features used to train and test a random forest classifier. Model 2 was identical to Model 1, but we used EMG, not EEG. Model 3 was a simple decision strategy contingent upon sleep stage label. Model 4 was identical to Model 1, but we used EEG subband power, sample entropy, and sleep stage label. All models performed above chance (Matthews correlation coefficient, MCC 0): Model 4 (leave-one-patient-out cross-validated MCC = 0.314) outperformed Model 3 (0.230) which outperformed Models 2 and 1 (0.147 and 0.154, respectively). Results indicate that sleep stage label alone is sufficient to detect apnea/hypopnea events. Either EMG or EEG subband power and sample entropy can be used to detect apnea/hypopnea events, but these EEG features likely reflect contamination by EMG. Indeed, EMG power was modulated by apnea/hypopnea event beginning and end, and similar modulation appeared in EEG power. Machine-learning approaches to the detection of apnea/hypopnea events using overnight EEG must be explainable; they must account for EMG contamination and sleep stage.
期刊介绍:
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control aims to provide a cross-disciplinary international forum for the interchange of information on research in the measurement and analysis of signals and images in clinical medicine and the biological sciences. Emphasis is placed on contributions dealing with the practical, applications-led research on the use of methods and devices in clinical diagnosis, patient monitoring and management.
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control reflects the main areas in which these methods are being used and developed at the interface of both engineering and clinical science. The scope of the journal is defined to include relevant review papers, technical notes, short communications and letters. Tutorial papers and special issues will also be published.