Apnea and hypopnea event detection using EEG, EMG, and sleep stage labels in a cohort of patients with suspected sleep apnea

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Biomedical Signal Processing and Control Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.107628
Danny H. Zhang , Jeffrey Zhou , Joseph D. Wickens , Andrew G. Veale , Luke E. Hallum
{"title":"Apnea and hypopnea event detection using EEG, EMG, and sleep stage labels in a cohort of patients with suspected sleep apnea","authors":"Danny H. Zhang ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Zhou ,&nbsp;Joseph D. Wickens ,&nbsp;Andrew G. Veale ,&nbsp;Luke E. Hallum","doi":"10.1016/j.bspc.2025.107628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Automating the screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of sleep apnea (SA) is potentially clinically useful. We present machine-learning models which detect SA and hypopnea events from the overnight electroencephalogram (EEG) and electromyogram (EMG), and we explain detection mechanisms. We tested four models using a novel data set comprising six-channel EEG and two-channel EMG recorded from 26 consecutive patients; recordings were expertly labeled with sleep stage and apnea/hypopnea events. For Model 1, EEG subband power and sample entropy were features used to train and test a random forest classifier. Model 2 was identical to Model 1, but we used EMG, not EEG. Model 3 was a simple decision strategy contingent upon sleep stage label. Model 4 was identical to Model 1, but we used EEG subband power, sample entropy, and sleep stage label. All models performed above chance (Matthews correlation coefficient, MCC <span><math><mo>&gt;</mo></math></span> 0): Model 4 (leave-one-patient-out cross-validated MCC = 0.314) outperformed Model 3 (0.230) which outperformed Models 2 and 1 (0.147 and 0.154, respectively). Results indicate that sleep stage label alone is sufficient to detect apnea/hypopnea events. Either EMG or EEG subband power and sample entropy can be used to detect apnea/hypopnea events, but these EEG features likely reflect contamination by EMG. Indeed, EMG power was modulated by apnea/hypopnea event beginning and end, and similar modulation appeared in EEG power. Machine-learning approaches to the detection of apnea/hypopnea events using overnight EEG must be explainable; they must account for EMG contamination and sleep stage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55362,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 107628"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746809425001399","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automating the screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of sleep apnea (SA) is potentially clinically useful. We present machine-learning models which detect SA and hypopnea events from the overnight electroencephalogram (EEG) and electromyogram (EMG), and we explain detection mechanisms. We tested four models using a novel data set comprising six-channel EEG and two-channel EMG recorded from 26 consecutive patients; recordings were expertly labeled with sleep stage and apnea/hypopnea events. For Model 1, EEG subband power and sample entropy were features used to train and test a random forest classifier. Model 2 was identical to Model 1, but we used EMG, not EEG. Model 3 was a simple decision strategy contingent upon sleep stage label. Model 4 was identical to Model 1, but we used EEG subband power, sample entropy, and sleep stage label. All models performed above chance (Matthews correlation coefficient, MCC > 0): Model 4 (leave-one-patient-out cross-validated MCC = 0.314) outperformed Model 3 (0.230) which outperformed Models 2 and 1 (0.147 and 0.154, respectively). Results indicate that sleep stage label alone is sufficient to detect apnea/hypopnea events. Either EMG or EEG subband power and sample entropy can be used to detect apnea/hypopnea events, but these EEG features likely reflect contamination by EMG. Indeed, EMG power was modulated by apnea/hypopnea event beginning and end, and similar modulation appeared in EEG power. Machine-learning approaches to the detection of apnea/hypopnea events using overnight EEG must be explainable; they must account for EMG contamination and sleep stage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用脑电图、肌电图和睡眠阶段标签检测疑似睡眠呼吸暂停患者的呼吸暂停和低通气事件
自动筛选、诊断和监测睡眠呼吸暂停(SA)是潜在的临床有用的。我们提出了从夜间脑电图(EEG)和肌电图(EMG)检测SA和低通气事件的机器学习模型,并解释了检测机制。我们使用一个新的数据集测试了四种模型,该数据集包括来自26个连续患者的六通道脑电图和双通道肌电图记录;录音被熟练地标记为睡眠阶段和呼吸暂停/低呼吸事件。对于模型1,EEG子带功率和样本熵是用来训练和测试随机森林分类器的特征。模型2与模型1相同,但我们使用肌电图,而不是脑电图。Model 3是一个基于睡眠阶段标签的简单决策策略。模型4与模型1相同,但我们使用了脑电子带功率、样本熵和睡眠阶段标签。所有模型的概率均高于(Matthews相关系数,MCC >;0):模型4(留1例患者交叉验证MCC = 0.314)优于模型3(0.230),优于模型2和模型1(分别为0.147和0.154)。结果表明,单独的睡眠阶段标签足以检测呼吸暂停/低呼吸事件。肌电图或脑电图子带功率和样本熵均可用于检测呼吸暂停/低呼吸事件,但这些脑电图特征可能反映了肌电图的污染。确实,肌电功率受到呼吸暂停/低呼吸事件开始和结束时的调制,脑电图功率也出现类似的调制。使用夜间脑电图检测呼吸暂停/低呼吸事件的机器学习方法必须是可解释的;他们必须考虑到肌电图污染和睡眠阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
13.70%
发文量
822
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Biomedical Signal Processing and Control aims to provide a cross-disciplinary international forum for the interchange of information on research in the measurement and analysis of signals and images in clinical medicine and the biological sciences. Emphasis is placed on contributions dealing with the practical, applications-led research on the use of methods and devices in clinical diagnosis, patient monitoring and management. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control reflects the main areas in which these methods are being used and developed at the interface of both engineering and clinical science. The scope of the journal is defined to include relevant review papers, technical notes, short communications and letters. Tutorial papers and special issues will also be published.
期刊最新文献
PulseAI: An automated machine learning-based augmentation index detector for arterial stiffness monitoring from cuff-based measurements 3D CNN-based method for automatic reorientation of 11C-acetate cardiac PET images using anchor point detection SWDL: Stratum-Wise Difference Learning with deep Laplacian pyramid for semi-supervised 3D intracranial hemorrhage segmentation Diffusion model-based medical ultrasound segmentation network in ultrasound image The application of convolutional neural networks for brain age prediction: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1