Jianru Wu , Xiaoqi Zhu , Biyu Tang , Jingying Wu , Fenfang Wei , Xinru Wang , Limin Li , Hongqiao Li , Yi Zhang , Bei Wang , Wenyu Wu , Xiang Hong
{"title":"Effects of bacterial vaginosis treatment during pregnancy on maternal-fetal outcome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Jianru Wu , Xiaoqi Zhu , Biyu Tang , Jingying Wu , Fenfang Wei , Xinru Wang , Limin Li , Hongqiao Li , Yi Zhang , Bei Wang , Wenyu Wu , Xiang Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Bacterial vaginosis (BV) can lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm delivery. However, it is unclear whether BV treatment during pregnancy can reduce the incidence of adverse maternal-fetal outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a meticulous literature search across various databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database. Utilizing <em>meta</em>-analysis, we delved into the relationship between diverse drug treatments, encompassing probiotics, antibiotics, and combination therapy, and their potential impact on adverse pregnancy outcomes. We also used network <em>meta</em>-analysis to explore the effects of different medications on the primary outcome of preterm delivery and ranked the intervention effects using P-scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-four eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Regardless of the type of treatment administered, the <em>meta</em>-analysis demonstrated that there was no decrease in the occurrence of preterm delivery following BV treatment during pregnancy (RR = 1.00, 95 % CI = 0.80–1.24, <em>P</em> = 0.96). But among the UK population, it was found that BV treatment during pregnancy was significantly associated with a reduced risk of preterm delivery (RR = 0.47, 95 % CI = 0.30–0.73, <em>P</em> < 0.001). Through network <em>meta</em>-analysis, oral probiotics obtained the highest P-scores (P-score = 0.86), but with a low quality evidence. This was followed by vaginal clindamycin plus clotrimazole (P-score = 0.78), and oral clindamycin (P-score = 0.58). Furthermore, it has not been discovered that BV treatment during pregnancy can decrease the likelihood of various other adverse outcomes, such as puerperal infections, miscarriages, premature rupture of membranes, low birth weight, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The current evidence fails to endorse the treatment of BV during pregnancy as a means to mitigate the risk of preterm delivery. Although probiotic therapies exhibit promising potential, the available data remains inadequate. Future research is necessary to further establish the safety and effectiveness of antibiotics and probiotics in the prevention or management of BV during pregnancy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"307 ","pages":"Pages 175-183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211525000697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) can lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm delivery. However, it is unclear whether BV treatment during pregnancy can reduce the incidence of adverse maternal-fetal outcomes.
Methods
We performed a meticulous literature search across various databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database. Utilizing meta-analysis, we delved into the relationship between diverse drug treatments, encompassing probiotics, antibiotics, and combination therapy, and their potential impact on adverse pregnancy outcomes. We also used network meta-analysis to explore the effects of different medications on the primary outcome of preterm delivery and ranked the intervention effects using P-scores.
Results
Twenty-four eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Regardless of the type of treatment administered, the meta-analysis demonstrated that there was no decrease in the occurrence of preterm delivery following BV treatment during pregnancy (RR = 1.00, 95 % CI = 0.80–1.24, P = 0.96). But among the UK population, it was found that BV treatment during pregnancy was significantly associated with a reduced risk of preterm delivery (RR = 0.47, 95 % CI = 0.30–0.73, P < 0.001). Through network meta-analysis, oral probiotics obtained the highest P-scores (P-score = 0.86), but with a low quality evidence. This was followed by vaginal clindamycin plus clotrimazole (P-score = 0.78), and oral clindamycin (P-score = 0.58). Furthermore, it has not been discovered that BV treatment during pregnancy can decrease the likelihood of various other adverse outcomes, such as puerperal infections, miscarriages, premature rupture of membranes, low birth weight, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission rates.
Conclusion
The current evidence fails to endorse the treatment of BV during pregnancy as a means to mitigate the risk of preterm delivery. Although probiotic therapies exhibit promising potential, the available data remains inadequate. Future research is necessary to further establish the safety and effectiveness of antibiotics and probiotics in the prevention or management of BV during pregnancy.
细菌性阴道病(BV)可导致不良妊娠结局,如早产。然而,尚不清楚妊娠期BV治疗是否能减少不良母胎结局的发生率。方法在PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane等数据库中进行了细致的文献检索。利用荟萃分析,我们深入研究了不同药物治疗之间的关系,包括益生菌、抗生素和联合治疗,以及它们对不良妊娠结局的潜在影响。我们还使用网络荟萃分析来探讨不同药物对早产主要结局的影响,并使用p评分对干预效果进行排名。结果共纳入24项符合条件的随机对照试验(RCTs)。无论采用何种治疗方式,meta分析均显示妊娠期BV治疗后早产发生率没有降低(RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.80-1.24, P = 0.96)。但在英国人群中,发现妊娠期BV治疗与早产风险降低显著相关(RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.30-0.73, P <;0.001)。通过网络meta分析,口服益生菌的p值最高(p值= 0.86),但证据质量较低。其次是阴道克林霉素加克霉唑(P-score = 0.78)和口服克林霉素(P-score = 0.58)。此外,尚未发现妊娠期BV治疗可以降低各种其他不良后果的可能性,如产褥期感染、流产、胎膜早破、低出生体重和新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院率。结论目前的证据不支持妊娠期治疗细菌性阴道炎作为降低早产风险的一种手段。虽然益生菌疗法显示出良好的潜力,但现有的数据仍然不足。未来的研究需要进一步确定抗生素和益生菌在预防或治疗妊娠期BV中的安全性和有效性。
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.