Respiratory distress after planned births compared to expectant management – Target trial emulation

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.02.012
Johanna Gunnarsdottir , Erik Lampa , Maria Jonsson , Linda Lindström , Kristjana Einarsdottir , Anna-Karin Wikström , Susanne Hesselman
{"title":"Respiratory distress after planned births compared to expectant management – Target trial emulation","authors":"Johanna Gunnarsdottir ,&nbsp;Erik Lampa ,&nbsp;Maria Jonsson ,&nbsp;Linda Lindström ,&nbsp;Kristjana Einarsdottir ,&nbsp;Anna-Karin Wikström ,&nbsp;Susanne Hesselman","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The primary aim of this study was to determine the appropriate gestational age for planned births by elective cesarean section (ECS) or induction of labor (IOL) in relation to no excess risk of neonatal respiratory distress.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Register-based Swedish cohort study including 575,817 singleton live births at 36 weeks or later. Births not eligible for vaginal delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes and infants with congenital anomalies were excluded. The primary outcome was respiratory distress, and a secondary outcome was Apgar score &lt;7 at five minutes. The risk of outcomes according to onset of birth was calculated for each day from gestational week 36 to 41 and compared with expectant management (EM), defined as births at least one day later.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No excess risk of respiratory distress was found for ECS from 40 weeks and for IOL from 38 weeks compared with EM. At 37 weeks, the absolute risk of respiratory distress was 12.4 % for ECS (aRR:5.7; 95 %CI:4.8; 6.5) and 4.0 % for IOL (aRR:1.7; 95 %CI:1.5; 2.0). At 39 weeks, the absolute risk of respiratory distress for ECS was 3.2 % (aRR:1.6; 95 %CI:1.3; 1.8) whereas the risk was reduced for IOL. ECS &lt;38 weeks increased the risk of Apgar &lt;7 compared with EM.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Regarding neonatal respiratory distress, IOL was safe from 38 weeks and ECS from 40 weeks. At earlier gestational ages, the risk of respiratory distress was significantly higher, which highlights the importance of clear health policies regarding appropriate timing and indications for planned births by ECS and IOL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"307 ","pages":"Pages 184-190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211525000739","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The primary aim of this study was to determine the appropriate gestational age for planned births by elective cesarean section (ECS) or induction of labor (IOL) in relation to no excess risk of neonatal respiratory distress.

Study design

Register-based Swedish cohort study including 575,817 singleton live births at 36 weeks or later. Births not eligible for vaginal delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes and infants with congenital anomalies were excluded. The primary outcome was respiratory distress, and a secondary outcome was Apgar score <7 at five minutes. The risk of outcomes according to onset of birth was calculated for each day from gestational week 36 to 41 and compared with expectant management (EM), defined as births at least one day later.

Results

No excess risk of respiratory distress was found for ECS from 40 weeks and for IOL from 38 weeks compared with EM. At 37 weeks, the absolute risk of respiratory distress was 12.4 % for ECS (aRR:5.7; 95 %CI:4.8; 6.5) and 4.0 % for IOL (aRR:1.7; 95 %CI:1.5; 2.0). At 39 weeks, the absolute risk of respiratory distress for ECS was 3.2 % (aRR:1.6; 95 %CI:1.3; 1.8) whereas the risk was reduced for IOL. ECS <38 weeks increased the risk of Apgar <7 compared with EM.

Conclusion

Regarding neonatal respiratory distress, IOL was safe from 38 weeks and ECS from 40 weeks. At earlier gestational ages, the risk of respiratory distress was significantly higher, which highlights the importance of clear health policies regarding appropriate timing and indications for planned births by ECS and IOL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计划生育后的呼吸窘迫与待产管理的比较——目标试验模拟
目的本研究的主要目的是确定通过选择性剖宫产(ECS)或引产(IOL)进行计划分娩的合适胎龄与新生儿呼吸窘迫风险无关。研究设计基于登记的瑞典队列研究,包括575,817例36周或更晚的单胎活产。排除了不适合阴道分娩、早产、胎膜早破和先天性异常的婴儿。主要结局是呼吸窘迫,次要结局是5分钟时Apgar评分7分。从妊娠第36周到第41周,每天计算分娩风险,并与准产管理(EM)(定义为至少晚一天分娩)进行比较。结果与EM相比,ECS 40周和IOL 38周没有发现呼吸窘迫的额外风险。37周时,ECS呼吸窘迫的绝对风险为12.4% (aRR:5.7;95%置信区间:4.8;人工晶状体为4.0% (aRR:1.7;95%置信区间:1.5;2.0)。39周时,ECS发生呼吸窘迫的绝对风险为3.2% (aRR:1.6;95%置信区间:1.3;1.8),而人工晶状体的风险降低。结论对于新生儿呼吸窘迫,IOL在38周后是安全的,ECS在40周后是安全的。在较早孕龄时,呼吸窘迫的风险明显较高,这突出了关于体外受精和人工晶状体植入术计划分娩的适当时机和适应症的明确卫生政策的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
The role of ultrasound in decision-making for the management of suspected acute appendicitis during pregnancy Vaginal hysterectomy in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: An eight-year experience from a tertiary care center Nile tilapia skin graft as a new treatment for vaginal agenesis in androgen insensitivity syndrome: a case series Impact of obesity on surgical outcomes following uterine-preserving apical prolapse repair: A retrospective cohort study Revisiting embryo selection: inner cell mass outweighs the trophectoderm in predicting live birth in single frozen blastocyst transfers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1