Infants’ organization of pull-to-stand behaviors during play: A longitudinal investigation

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Infant Behavior & Development Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.infbeh.2025.102033
Sabrina L. Thurman, Rebecca Rose
{"title":"Infants’ organization of pull-to-stand behaviors during play: A longitudinal investigation","authors":"Sabrina L. Thurman,&nbsp;Rebecca Rose","doi":"10.1016/j.infbeh.2025.102033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pulling-to-stand (PTS) is an important transitional posture which may facilitate the shift to walking, but infants still frequently PTS even after learning to walk. Using a group of 13 infants who had learned to PTS about three weeks prior, we aimed to track how gains in PTS, standing, and walking experience contributed to infants’ selection of more skilled PTS strategies and reorganized how infants used PTS to facilitate free play. We tracked spontaneous PTS over 10 biweekly laboratory sessions and video-coded functional measures of PTS skill, including hand-, knee-, and foot-use (e.g., lateral sides, hand- and foot-steps), and how infants used PTS during play, including behaviors immediately following PTS. Results showed infants frequently adopted skilled half-kneel strategies en route to PTS even though they were slower than symmetric PTS strategies. Most PTS involved asymmetrical and diagonal activation of the hands and legs, offering a stable center of gravity, and lateralized foot preferences were strong and stable. Other functional measures of PTS skill revealed increased efficiency over time, as infants PTS using fewer alternating hand-steps. Initially, infants PTS using stationary objects and then interacted with objects and mothers, but over time, infants increasingly PTS using the stairs and stair rails and engaged in more locomotor exploration following PTS. Even months after its initial onset, infants continued to refine PTS strategies and efficiency and used PTS differently for object interactions and locomotor exploration during play, which highlights the importance of tracking patterns of interlimb coordination during PTS and goal-directed behavior in context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48222,"journal":{"name":"Infant Behavior & Development","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 102033"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Behavior & Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638325000074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pulling-to-stand (PTS) is an important transitional posture which may facilitate the shift to walking, but infants still frequently PTS even after learning to walk. Using a group of 13 infants who had learned to PTS about three weeks prior, we aimed to track how gains in PTS, standing, and walking experience contributed to infants’ selection of more skilled PTS strategies and reorganized how infants used PTS to facilitate free play. We tracked spontaneous PTS over 10 biweekly laboratory sessions and video-coded functional measures of PTS skill, including hand-, knee-, and foot-use (e.g., lateral sides, hand- and foot-steps), and how infants used PTS during play, including behaviors immediately following PTS. Results showed infants frequently adopted skilled half-kneel strategies en route to PTS even though they were slower than symmetric PTS strategies. Most PTS involved asymmetrical and diagonal activation of the hands and legs, offering a stable center of gravity, and lateralized foot preferences were strong and stable. Other functional measures of PTS skill revealed increased efficiency over time, as infants PTS using fewer alternating hand-steps. Initially, infants PTS using stationary objects and then interacted with objects and mothers, but over time, infants increasingly PTS using the stairs and stair rails and engaged in more locomotor exploration following PTS. Even months after its initial onset, infants continued to refine PTS strategies and efficiency and used PTS differently for object interactions and locomotor exploration during play, which highlights the importance of tracking patterns of interlimb coordination during PTS and goal-directed behavior in context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婴儿在游戏中的拉站行为组织:纵向调查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infant Behavior & Development
Infant Behavior & Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Infant Behavior & Development publishes empirical (fundamental and clinical), theoretical, methodological and review papers. Brief reports dealing with behavioral development during infancy (up to 3 years) will also be considered. Papers of an inter- and multidisciplinary nature, for example neuroscience, non-linear dynamics and modelling approaches, are particularly encouraged. Areas covered by the journal include cognitive development, emotional development, perception, perception-action coupling, motor development and socialisation.
期刊最新文献
Infants’ organization of pull-to-stand behaviors during play: A longitudinal investigation Young infants’ sensitivity to precursors of vowel harmony is independent of language experience Role differentiated bimanual manipulation during a lab-based free play task Contextual differences in parent-child interactions: A study on toddlers at elevated likelihood of autism and their mothers Sensitivity to temporal synchrony in audiovisual speech and language development in infants with an elevated likelihood of autism: A developmental review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1